I understand what you are saying but time and time again your army said Lahore is your target. During
Yes, they did, only to ease the pressure off our guys in northern punjab!!Is it really that hard to comprehend??
whole war you kept saying same. When you failed at Lahore you attacked Sialkot. You failed there too. When you failed there you attacked Sindh. You failed there too.
We did not fail at Lahore, we did not even get to make an attempt at Lahore as the cease fire came right when our forces had managed to reach its outskirts in Burki.And yeah, you defended Sialkot, congrats.
You kept shifting goals but at the end of war we won because we managed to retain Kashmir somehow. Is that your "victory" of 1965 war? Looks very lousy and poor. But if you want to remain in delusions that you won 65 war. Then be my guest.
So what??We did what we had to, to defend our land and we did that successfully, with far less number of casualties and while holding a much greater landmass of your territory, so that's a win.And keep laughing girly.
Why bring something new when cow urine is of utmost importance in India today? There is special researches in top Indian universities on cow urine. Your ministers are explaining benefits of cow urine. Hell your government wants to create a ministry on cows. How can we ignore such an important thing?? You might be hindu or not but you live in a hindu country where cow and its urine means a lot.
And how is that even relevant to our current discussion other than scoring some obvious cheap shots and trying to evading the actual discussion??It's fooling no one sister.
So we would keep mentioning it to show how your remain faggots due to drinking cow urine and remained an incomplete product due to its usage.
Talking about faggotry, bachabazi was a thing in Pakistan (and Afghanistan) and you can't get more faggoty than that!!And what does our perceived sexual orientation even has got to do with this topic except of course trying to divert it.What happened??Too scared to go into the direct route now??
Use your f*cking eyes to read what I presented. Using your pichwara to read things might be a norm in India but when you are on a Pakistani forum. Use the eyes God gave you. Your PM wrote to UN to show his willingness to accept ceasefire and to implement it within 24 hours even though only 7 days passed in the war. It was Pakistan who rejected the ceasefire and only accepted it 7 days later when US and USSR intervened. You were ready and asking for ceasefire much before Pakistan agreed. Read again:
Yeah yeah, by the end the situation had reversed completely.
My army couldn't do it? It captured enough land in Akhnor to make sure that you are forced to return very strategi haji pir pass in its return. It made your attack in Sindh to be a complete failure and captured land in Rajasthan sector. It halted your advance in Lahore and Sialkot sectors. It captured land in Khemkaran sector. While you are happy that after 17 days of war you managed to capture dograi village while Lahore remains unconquered even though Lahore is right next to international border. Great achievement.
Whatever rocks your boat missy.
We successfully defended all our majore cities even though all our major cities were right next to international border. You manged to capture few villages and keep changing goal for you to from Lahore to Sialkot to Sindh to finally in Kashmir.
It was a military stalemate and that was it. Keep your "we won 65 war" cr@p to fool your future generations. Won't work here.
Stalemate from your perspective may be, not from ours.We didn't start the war after all and by the end, we were at a clearly more advantageous position and could deal heavier blows had the conflict been alowed to drag on.
You don't give anyone for free. That is neither your nature nor your auqat chutya kumari. Youi returned it to get back what you lost in Akhnor. It was a pretty simple exchange.
No miss Chutyio ki raani, we do give back a lot for free!!Like we gave back all the 6000 sq kilometers of West Pakistani territory we gained during 71 when you had nothing in your hands to make an exchange.
It was too shaky and too iffy for a victory. The fact is that it was a military stalemate.
Whatever, let's agree to disagree, lest the bout should drag on till kingdom comes.
Bullsh!t. Both have their respective advantages and disadvantages. It was an even fight. don't act like you were too weak of a rat to fight Pakistan.
Just check the stats dude, just check the stats!!I'm not saying we were a push over but the advantage was certainly on your side, except in number of troops!!And even there, your soldiers were better equipped (and I dare say better trained as they had war gamed the scenario in US) and that's a fact.
But we are rejecting your delusions of victory and doing it well. Frustration is obvious and natural. It hurts.
No frustration here m8.
The way Indian army gets treated at LOC again and again, it would be too stupid and delusional to reject our guts.
Again and again, like you mean a few pot shots by your snipers every once in a while Indian Army decimates your posts with ATGMs and topples your lorries into rivers (or was it because of a beoda driver)??!!
But anyways good to know that you are not stupid.
Respect should be given when and where it's due, that's my policy.
B
ut that doesn't mean we would accept your bogus victories too in return.
It's a matter of perspective really.You had a much more grandiose objective in 65, so it's a stalemate for you.Ours on the other hand, was a far more modest one, all the blusters and posturing by the Indian generals not withstanding as evidenced by the words of the then COAS J.N. Chaudhary!!He said on record that Lahore wasn't thier aim, they only open that front to ease pressure off the very lightly defended Akhnoor sector.
I have read and heard many great accounts of bravery of Indian army from Pakistani officers and I respect that but don't expect us to accept us historical lies and propaganda of India in return.
Thanks, man and I'm not telling you to believe in any propaganda.All I'm saying is that it's just a matter of different perspective, that's all.And besides, even most Indians do not take it as much of a victory as I said it was a very shaky one.
That jeep was in response to your cr@p that Lahore was left undefended and Indian army didn't conquer it because they thought it was a trap. That was my very first post in your reply.
You will always find some ill-informed posters every once in a while, that doesn't mean you have to get down to their levels!!
Anyways keep beleving BS they told you at RSS shakha.
For the nth time, I won't even be alowed to go near an RSS camp!!I'm not a Hindu, I was born into a completely nonreligious household!!
Do told me anytime later why Sialkot was not conquered. Ask RSS for excuse if you can't find any.
What is there to tell you??We lost in the battle of Chawinda, no one disputes that.You people scored a grand one there and no body can take it away from you people.The only thing is, Indian Army did not outnumber you 4 to 1 in that sector, heck, its own armored forces were outnumbered actually!!But it was a grand victory on your part never the less.
Anyway, raat bahut ho gayee hai, good night and sweet dreams.