War trophies: When Hindu kings desecrated temples and abducted idols

[Maira La]

Tamil is alien to Sri Lanka... it certainly is not native.

Tamil arrival on the island is very recent (colonial era) and mostly illegally with boats and without proper travel documents. As illegal Tamil population grows, Indian saffron chaddi gang might attempt to fabricate history to convince the world of Tamils' right to the stolen land. I hope it never comes to that and you guys expel the remaining Tamils back to their Tamil Nadu!

 

[Hyperion]

To tell you the truth, I'm quite enjoying radicalization of Indian society at large. Never say never, welcome to Pakistan of 1990's....... maybe even worse, as the halo effect of radicalization of such a large population will be show of the millennium.

Fingers crossed, Modi will be "The Person" to break India at grass roots level.

Please some more Hinduvata Kool-Aid for the Indian people, thirsty for glorious past, present and future......

 

[dravidianhero]

Tamil arrival on the island is very recent (colonial era) and mostly illegally with boats and without proper travel documents. As illegal Tamil population grows, Indian saffron chaddi gang might attempt to fabricate history to convince the world of Tamils' right to the stolen land. I hope it never comes to that and you guys expel the remaining Tamils back to their Tamil Nadu!

Why do you open your mouth without any basic knowledge on the issue..we dravidians have been residing in srilanka even during IVC I.e.around 3000BC.Sri Lanka is originally land of dravidians(linguistically..most Sinhalese are same as south Indians genetically)

 

[Maira La]

Why do you open your mouth without any basic knowledge on the issue..we dravidians have been residing in srilanka even during IVC I.e.around 3000BC.

Yeah you went and traveled around at the time of IVC!

Edit/PS: we don't know much about the residents of the island in 3000 BC, but Sinhalese are mostly the original natives with some foreign genes mixed in. Tamils are a Dravidian people, but not all Dravidians are Tamil. The Tamil illegal exodus into other people's land is very recent. ;p

 

[samv]

Tamil arrival on the island is very recent (colonial era) and mostly illegally with boats and without proper travel documents. As illegal Tamil population grows, Indian saffron chaddi gang might attempt to fabricate history to convince the world of Tamils' right to the stolen land. I hope it never comes to that and you guys expel the remaining Tamils back to their Tamil Nadu!

Tamils love to claim everything as theirs. But it the case of Sri Lanka they were the ones who time and time again invaded the island and try to steal the land and claim it as theirs - not happy with South India. The fact that there are Tamil language speakers in Sri Lanka goes to show that they are recent arrivals.

I can give you a lot of evidence from research done by many people but you will dismiss them as Tamil nationalists work...no amount of your people 's shouting would convince me that there were no Tamils in Sri Lanka before prakrits arrived..what an utter stupid, illogical and irrational theory to believe..I reiterate.. it is highly unlikely that Prakrit people who were thousands of miles away could have reached Sri Lanka before tamilians who are just 20 kms from there..go and tell your non sense to some gullible sinhala bigot..I am not a tamilian but now I understand why tamilians hate you..you people are trying to distort history just to prevent Tamils from claiming that Tamils are original inhabitants of Sri Lanka(genetically both sinhalese and tamilians are same though).

Why would anyone want to believe "Tamil nationalists work"? Laughable.

You can believe whatever you want to believe but as it stands there is absolutely zero evidence of any established ancient Tamil civilisation in Sri Lanka prior to the arrival of Prakrit speaking people. The latter are the ones who established a proper civilisation in Sri Lanka and the Sinhalese indentity and language developed entirely in Sri Lanka. The Tamils have no equivalent Anuradhapuras, Polonnaruwas, Sigiriyas, Dambullas, Panduvasnuwaras, The island is the homeland of the Sinhalese people who have shed their blood for thousands of years protecting it from Tamil invasions from what is now South India.

Tamils are invaders to Sri Lanka who have left nothing but death, destruction and violence in their wake. They have contributed nothing to civilisational development of the island except the looting of Buddhist temples, massacres and thievery. If they have a problem in Sri Lanka they are most welcome to go back to Tamil Nadu from whence they came.... which is what they usually do - run to Tamil Nadu at the drop of a hat because they know that is where they actually come from. Do you see the Sinhalese running to India for safety? That's because they don't come from there and don't regard any of it as their homeland.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Are you mad? The SInhalese originated in SL....even your mahabharata and many many hindu scriptures had identified SL as Sinhala...

Between the majority of Tamils were brought largely to the north by the Dutch for coffee and tobacco plantations

It was the opinion of Sri Lanka envoy.

Lanka plays Bengal card

“It is believed that 75 per cent of the Sinhala race in Sri Lanka originated from in and around Kalinga (modern-day Odisha). Therefore, the people in Odisha and Bengal consider the Sinhala population in Sri Lanka as having its origins in India. The strong links that existed were torn asunder by Moghul and British invasion.”

 

[samv]

May be for you Ramayana is a myth, but for billions of indians and Indonesians, Malaysians, Thais, even China and Japanese, and also combodia, Philippines, laos , Singapore, believe rama did exist, I think you have not seen the places where rama, lived, may be you have not heard about ayodhya, and sarayu river, or hundreds of places he visited, and even there is the place called kishkinda the place of hanuman, vanara means (people of the forest) and there the bridge between India and Lanka, even NASA accepts that its man made, and there are many historical places in srilanka, where ravanas golden palace was built, there is even archeological excavations going on in Lanka, and lot of ancient temples and structures are unearthed in ayodhya, if Ramayana is false, bible is cock and bull story, and I know old testament is filled with cock n bull stories, and tell me exactly where was Buddha born, or how did he look, how did he speak, exactly where did he lived, if at all he really existed? no one has seen with their own eyes, so as rama is myth for you Buddha and Jesus is myth for me.

You are free to believe whatever fairy tales you want as is anyone else. In case you haven't realised there are many scholars who see much of the Bible as false.

If you actually think this is a historical figure...

There is nothing I can say that will change your mind.

 

[Gibbs]

Pls read proper history. Tamils are natives in Srilanka. Sinhalese came from Odisha (India).

Proper history according to who ? Madras comic society ?

People who spoke Prakrit which later developed into Sinhalese migrated to Sri Lanka and it is a historical fact..not even Sri lankans dispute that fact..similarly people who spoke proto Tamil which later developed into Tamil in India had been living for thousands of years in Sri Lanka..the newly arrived Prakrit people demolished their temples and civilisation and replaced it with Buddhist one..it is a historical fact...it is beyond logic to believe that there was no civilisation in an island which is just 22 kms away from TN before the arrival of Prakrit speaking people.

Tamils did exist on the island for thousands of years, Possibly preceding Sinhalese migrants originally from East and Western India.. But vast majority of those so called Sri Lankan Tamils are more recent migrants from the 16th century Dutch indentured labor bought over to work in the tobacco plantations in the northern hinterland called the Vanni and to the Eastern Province.. Infact most were not even Tamil but Telingu's and Malayalee from Malabar Coasts and the Coromandel coasts that were under the Dutch.. Later on got "Tamilized"

And these people do not include the thousands bought over by the Brits in the 19th century for the tea plantations.. Now so called Indian origin or plantation Tamil

Prabhakaran converted to Christianity (Methodist). His son's name is Charles Anthony. Tamil Hindus looting Sri Lanka... my as$.

Prabakharan didnt convert he was born Christian in to a family with origins from Kerala.. Majority of the LTTE especially it's command were Catholics.. One reason they got a lot of support from certain sections of the Church both in the West and from South India

In Earlier days Tamils and Srilanka cannot be seperated as both were tamils. I told you to read History properly before comment. Simply today's majority cannot be natives. You're similar to US. Natives became minority.

The Sri Lankan culture is distinct and unique and is interwoven with the Sinhalese Buddhist civilization.. The predominant civilization in the island has always been the Sinhalese. Anybody who has any idea of the history of the country would know this

You fool.. can't you understand plain English? Sinhalese is native to Sri Lanka..no doubt
.but its mother Prakrit is Indian..bigots like you just to take away the rights of Tamils over Sri Lanka are trying to distort history..the good thing about srinlankann history is their religious books themselves mention that they are not native..a king called some vijaya or veshya arrived with his army in Sri Lanka from Bengal or orissa and established his kingdom there..no matter however much you bark present day Sinhalese ancestors are not natives to Sri Lanka (every historian admits this ) and Tamils or Dravidian speaking tribes were the original inhabitants of Sri Lanka.

While i agree that Sinhalese are indeed migrants from Eastern and Western India, And that for all possibility South Indians may have been on the island longer

I disagree that Tamils and Dravidians are the original inhabitants of the island.. The aboriginal Vedda people are.. And they have distinct genetic make up that neither associate with South Indians nor Sinhalese

And Tamils though may well have been inhabiting the extreme Northern regions of the island it has been proven that they have never had a civilization foothold on the island.. Neither historically nor archaeologically.. Propaganda apart

No need of any source..it is common sense..how can Prakrit speaking people who are thousands of kilometers away from srilanka arrive there before Tamils who are just a few miles away.You want to go against history if you say an Indo European language was existing there before any Dravidian language entered there? Proto dravidian languages have been a part of india for thousands of years before indo european languages arrived in india..No matter what you say evidence is completely against you.historians and Buddhist books like mahavamsa clearly say you were from Bengal.Tamilians have first right over srilanka.

Utter crap.. Repeating the same BS without any evidence does not make it true mate

@dravidianhero
if there is any civilisation in any country there is a product by that civilisation. Show me a single product by a tamil civilisation in SL? tell me a single thing...show me a single thing..

Products of a civilisation are language, literature, architecture, folk lore, beliefs, kings and their stories, ancient monuments, behavioral patterns, festivities, .....Only sinhala civilisation has produced such things in SL...why did the Tamils fail to have anything in SL if they had any civilisation?
All the things that Tamils in SL have as their own is foreign, nothing that is native to SL....

Why has all historical records do NOT mention about any tamil civilisation in SL? Why do even TN histroical documents fail to mention that? Why has chinese, greeks, romans, Burmese, Siamese fail to mention about such a tamil civilisation while they have referred to Sinhala civilisation many times?
why?

Why does that tamil civilisation has no evidence to show its existence?

Well put.. These are the same people that believe the whole world was once Tamil, Including the Koreans..

Because there might have been only Tamil tribes living there before Prakrit people came..or the newly arrived prakrits might have erased Tamil culture and monuments over a period of time.

May, Would have, Might have.. Does'nt count.. Not in the real world.. Maybe in fantasy novels and movies.. Not in the real world

 

[vayuputhra]

You are free to believe whatever fairy tales you want as is anyone else. In case you haven't realised there are many scholars who see much of the Bible as false.

If you actually think this is a historical figure...

There is nothing I can say that will change your mind.

You are also free to believe in any cock and bull stories as real, I am no one to say it to you, but don't say that only you are the holiest than thou and all others are false, have you seen any of your gods or what ever with your own eyes, if you don't know how did your great grand father looked like how can you tell about people who lived 6000 to 7000 years ago, now the scientists are saying that human beings evolved 3 million years before what had been thought before, when sinhalas forefathers had not even heard of srilanka, rama had visited Lanka 4000 years ago, only then after Buddhism came you came to know about Lanka and came to live there.

 

[Gibbs]

Hello brother, pls ready credible History all around the world. Living in denial of historic facts doesn't change anything.
All the Hindu gods, temples are demolished by Sinhalese for many years. Even now after north and east there are plenty of temples demolised and replaced by buhhist temples.. You keep talking without knowledge of History - no use in talking.

Yes best you dont discuss something you have no idea of..

 

[Pakistani E]

First of all I did not blame Islam but the Islamic rulers who have implemented such policies in the name of their religion.

I gave very neutral ( or potentially biased towards Islam) sources and still you would qualify your statements with an "If".

I myself have posted multiple points of view on this subject (refer below links) and I am yet to find single Muslim member here from the subcontinent who condemned it and yet you blame me for what I am not.

History of Muslim Rule in India – Mahmud Ghaznavi to Aurangzeb

History of Muslim Rule in India – Mahmud Ghaznavi to Aurangzeb

History of Muslim Rule in India – Mahmud Ghaznavi to Aurangzeb

I have no disagreement with you if you are merely pointing out that some Muslim rulers of India have commited atrocities against Hindus and other non Muslims. I know they did and anyone who points to them to show them as great warriors of Islam are deluded. I condemn all tyrants regardless of religion, ethnicty, caste etc.

 

[jamahir]

How about reverse love jihad @jamahir

is that waheeda rahman??

i won't confirm or deny that i know telugu so you will have to explain the context of the song.

but i have never wanted to stop muslim ladies who were romantically engaged with hindu men,

 

[The_Showstopper]

How about reverse love jihad @jamahir

LOL Love Jihad? Enough of lies...

Love Jihad: BJP MLA Suresh Rana says he fabricated rape charges against Muslim boys | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis

 

[jamahir]

LOL Love Jihad? Enough of lies...

Love Jihad: BJP MLA Suresh Rana says he fabricated rape charges against Muslim boys | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis

According to a post on Youth Ki Awaaz, Suresh Rana said: “Now I will tell you the truth. We charged them with rape, but it wasn’t rape, it was consensual. We slapped a rape case against them to teach them a lesson. The girl wasn’t ready to give a statement against them. If you look at the case in depth, the girl was willing. Three people didn’t take her away by force… Girls are girls…it has been said about them that they will change according to circumstances in five minutes…when she was slapped and coerced, she wrote the FIR (that we wanted).”What do you think?”

i have always said that not only these sanghi terrorists act against muslim men but also act against the human rights of hindu ladies.

why isn't the supreme court acting on this?? if inter-caste marriages can be encouraged, why not inter-religion??

saw a thread about burma two days ago... one of white house's favorite puppets, aung san suu kyi, is in cahoots with "buddhist" reactionaries who have also declared a war on buddhist-muslim marriages.

why isn't white house interested in these anti-human things in india and burma?? after all, western governments generally are so very concerned about "human rights".

Balyan was quoted saying by The Wire: “In the beginning, (Muslim) boys would roam around on motorcycles in front of schools and Plus Two Colleges using Hindu names like Sonu, Monu, with a kalawa (sacred thread) tied around their wrists, pretending to be Hindus. A girl who falls in this trap would come to know only later, after eloping with the boy, that she is not with a Hindu. There have been a lot of such cases.”

the lies !!

so the meerut case turned out, yet again, a case where a couple was being victimized by indian society and parents of the lady.

the anchor should have put the bjp fellow on the spot by asking if he supports inter-religion marriage.

edit : presently watching the "operation juliet" parts.

 

[The_Showstopper]

i have always said that not only these sanghi terrorists act against muslim men but also act against the human rights of hindu ladies.

why isn't the supreme court acting on this?? if inter-caste marriages can be encouraged, why not inter-religion??

saw a thread about burma two days ago... one of white house's favorite puppets, aung san suu kyi, is in cahoots with "buddhist" reactionaries who have also declared a war on buddhist-muslim marriages.

why isn't white house interested in these anti-human things in india and burma?? after all, western governments generally are so very concerned about "human rights".



the lies !!



so the meerut case turned out, yet again, a case where a couple was being victimized by indian society and parents of the lady.

the anchor should have put the bjp fellow on the spot by asking if he supports inter-religion marriage.

edit : presently watching the "operation juliet" parts.

I always wondered how the educated lots among Hindus fall for this but then again it reminds me of ISIS recruits who also happen to hold educational degrees yet get into this...