What's new

Virtual history: Middle Eastern Union (MEU)

.
I think accepting member to Morocco is too much. Geographics decides the fate of everything. They are too far away to our region..

I think Middle East nations alone are sufficient, which are: Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Northern Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Yemen, Oman. Hell even Israel can join, which would increase regional stability! 17 nations, more than enough!

And no one would accept riyal as their currency and none of these nations would give up the controls of their currencies.

Open borders with no check-point would also not be accepted..

We shouldnt aim to become a union like EU. EU is having problems right now BECAUSE of this much integration..

Our union's aim should be first of all minimizing economic dependency on countries we have little control over (countries that have little dependency on us) thus coubtries that can afford sanctioning us, by redirecting some of that trade volume with non-neighboring countries to our trades with neighboring countries by simply eliminating tariffs.

That would increase our dependency on our neighbors, but that is the point after all.

We can also eliminate visas so that our tourists would visit neighbors more abd otger countries less, further reducing impacts of a possible sanction from a non-neighboring country!

We can also sign a military alliance pack and that would reduce our dependency on other countries for security while increasing that of our neighbors, further increasing sustainable stability in the region!

CHP-IP coalition gov't triggers Trexit from MEU. :P
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom