Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
Qin and Han were purely Huaxia people, Sui and Tang were only 1/4 Xianbei, but 3/4 Han Chinese.
And Song and Ming were also 100% Han Chinese.
according to your logic, the european royal mixed with each other. Spanish is not full spanish,french is not 100% french, german is partly germam?
Sui and Tang are pure Han,even they had some descent of xianbei, but the xianbei royal families tried very hard to adopt han culture. Xianbei can be called Han after 魏孝文帝。 His willing to sinify his people should be highly praised.
I said the Sui/Tang Emperors were racially predominantly Han with some minor Xianbei mixture, but culturally they were 100% Han.
Of course, the ancient Chinese royal families are far more homogeneous than the European monarchies.
Would you believe the nonsense that the Ming Emperor "明成祖" was like half Mongolian or half Korean?
Of course not, they were pure Han Chinese.
So you contradict yourself. This happens when you try to deny facts and cover-up.Sui and Tang are pure Han, even they had some descent of xianbei
Tang's upper-class culture was quite different from that of Han Chinese culture, especially women's position. Tang era noble women rode horse, hunted, owned property in her own name, and remarried. This is exactly opposite of Han Chinese culture oppressive toward women represented by bound feet custom, and mirrors that of Altaic nomad cultures up north. Not to mention that Tang had an active trading with Central Asia and Middle East and hired Muslims as administrators, while traditional Han Dynasties were Xenophonic and Han purists.I said the Sui/Tang Emperors were racially predominantly Han with some minor Xianbei mixture, but culturally they were 100% Han.
European royals were blood relatives of each other. Recall Princess Diana describing the British Royals as "Cold Germans" while she was alive.Of course, the ancient Chinese royal families are far more homogeneous than the European monarchies.
So you know the story. Let me give you a hint. Why did the Emperor Yongle leave the safety of Nanjing, the traditional Han Chinese capital, and move to Beijing, the Imperial city of Mongols and so close to the Mongols?Would you believe the nonsense that the Ming Emperor "明成祖" was like half Mongolian or half Korean?
Yet they are still all caucasians speaking Indo-European languages.The fact is that the Europeans are the true mongrels with a cocktail mixture of different father haplogroups.
Of course. You should tell that to your fellow Chinese nationalists who insist that Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese ancestors came from China.While the majority of the modern Chinese are descended from a single Proto-Sinic haplogroup, which makes us unrelated to Japanese/Korean/Vietnamese.
Yet they are still all caucasians speaking Indo-European languages.
Of course. You should tell that to your fellow Chinese nationalists who insist that Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese ancestors came from China.
Of course. You should tell that to your fellow Chinese nationalists who insist that Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese ancestors came from China.
You guys better to stay away from us, and stop dreaming about our lands.
I said the Sui/Tang Emperors were racially predominantly Han with some minor Xianbei mixture, but culturally they were 100% Han.
Of course, the ancient Chinese royal families are far more homogeneous than the European monarchies.
Would you believe the nonsense that the Ming Emperor "明成祖" was like half Mongolian or half Korean?
Of course not, they were pure Han Chinese.
Those aren't Muslims, the original article clearly state they drank alcohol. And why are we hearing this if CCP are trying to censor it.