What's new

VIEW: Success lies in secularism —Dr Irfan Zafar

There's much left in it --- the poor policeman is just an appetizer - pay attention.

Ok....seems like a futile exercise though. But I guess there are people here who seem to be confused about Faith in their religion and it's connection with the topic under discussion. Don't you think it is only meaningful in a secular environment?
 
.
Ok....seems like a futile exercise though. But I guess there are people here who seem to be confused about Faith in their religion and it's connection with the topic under discussion. Don't you think it is only meaningful in a secular environment?


I congratulate on picking up on this point -- Faith, by definition conviction in the absence of confirming circumstances is deeply related to secular environment ---And I would make the point again, that faith and certitude are not the same thing - while faith can lead to certitude, because faith allows for degree, that is to say it grows and contracts, it and certitude are not fellow travelers.

To the islamlist, Faith is nothing - the Islamist does not understand it's composition, it's deeply personal meaning and growth and contraction, it's relationship to, indeed it's substance as love and it's voluntary association.

We have offered that faith by definition is conviction in the absence of confirming circumstance -- now in countries that have "implemented" Islam (read used coercion) for example mandating that ther be no public eating or drinking during Ramazan - these actions rob an adherent of the voluntary freely taken upon obligations - so that faith becomes meaningless and the religiosity one of outward appearances and rituals devoid of personal meaning.
 
.
I congratulate on picking up on this point -- Faith, by definition conviction in the absence of confirming circumstances is deeply related to secular environment ---And I would make the point again, that faith and certitude are not the same thing - while faith can lead to certitude, because faith allows for degree, that is to say it grows and contracts, it and certitude are not fellow travelers.

To the islamlist, Faith is nothing - the Islamist does not understand it's composition, it's deeply personal meaning and growth and contraction, it's relationship to, indeed it's substance as love and it's voluntary association.

We have offered that faith by definition is conviction in the absence of confirming circumstance -- now in countries that have "implemented" Islam (read used coercion) for example mandating that ther be no public eating or drinking during Ramazan - these actions rob an adherent of the voluntary freely taken upon obligations - so that faith becomes meaningless and the religiosity one of outward appearances and rituals devoid of personal meaning.

Best post of this thread yet.
 
. .
To the islamlist, Faith is nothing - the Islamist does not understand it's composition, it's deeply personal meaning and growth and contraction, it's relationship to, indeed it's substance as love and it's voluntary association.

We have offered that faith by definition is conviction in the absence of confirming circumstance -- now in countries that have "implemented" Islam (read used coercion) for example mandating that ther be no public eating or drinking during Ramazan - these actions rob an adherent of the voluntary freely taken upon obligations - so that faith becomes meaningless and the religiosity one of outward appearances and rituals devoid of personal meaning.

You hit the nail on the head with this one. The almost irrational fear of "secularism" is not suggestive of people confident of their faith but quite simply the opposite. If they are so sure of their faith, why would it matter if the state remains out of it. The argument almost suggests that without the active intervention of the state, there exists a fear in the minds of anti-secular group that fissiparous tendencies lie dormant within & would show up the moment people have freedom of choice. The only freedom of choice that these people would agree with is similar to the famous quip of Henry Ford - "They can have any colour (of car) that they like, just as long as it is black".
 
.
Whether The offer to inspire murder at the hands of the policemen and his ilk or the learned expositions offered by others - though they offer Islam and Quran as a new Little Red Book, if you will, a work in which all problems for all times find solution -- (and therefore what need of any other human endeavor or deliberation) none of these will dare to tackle faith - and it is right and good that this should be the case, for Faith in God, is that Mercy whose expression no totalitarian ideology can deny.

See friends, that is why Islam is a Dawa or "Invitation" -- the invitation is always open, whether you accept or reject or choose any other time to accept or reject, the door is always open, no one will be hunted down, no one has need of fear and in fact, it is a message to rejoice, to don't worry be happy.

No sour dour ideology total control, no idiot notion of all solutions to all problems through all time and space and geography -- Mercy is available, if you choose -- that consciousness, that awakening, that trembling, racing sensation of joy - No ideology, no "system", no "way of life" can coerce, can impose. This is why Islam is inherently secular, it cannot be meaningful in another way.
 
.
You hit the nail on the head with this one. The almost irrational fear of "secularism" is not suggestive of people confident of their faith but quite simply the opposite. If they are so sure of their faith, why would it matter if the state remains out of it. The argument almost suggests that without the active intervention of the state, there exists a fear in the minds of anti-secular group that fissiparous tendencies lie dormant within & would show up the moment people have freedom of choice. The only freedom of choice that these people would agree with is similar to the famous quip of Henry Ford - "They can have any colour (of car) that they like, just as long as it is black".

Dear bang galore, it seems as if you have no idea what islam is?

I already explained that islam is a deen not a religion.

Islam is not about pleasing god but god guiding people how to interact with each other as well as how to make best use of the land and resources for their own good.

Allah was the only one there before he created the creation. He decided to create the universe and people. We were not there to object, just as we were not there to object when our parents decided to have little ones.

The quran tells that god decided to create us as people who do as they please ie creatures with ability to choose to do as we please.

The reason islam needs organisation is because that is what it is for ie to help people use what god created for them. If I do not have control of land where do I get my living from? The same is true in your case.

If I control the land and tell you off, would that be ok with you? Or vice versa? Islam is no use if it does not have control over things and that control is god given to all equally. You have no right to cut off my livelihood nor do I as per the quran.

Even animals have right according to the quran because people are made responsible to care for them.

Allah created everything and he deciding to do certain things without needing permission of any of us. All we can do is do as he says or do things our own way. Whatever we do consequences will follow.

So if we want better world then we all must learn to agree to some dos and some don'ts.

The reason is we were not here all by ourselves nor can we live without each other. I need you as much as you need me ie we are interlinked and interdependent regardless we love it or hate it. We are therefore stuck with each other. so we can decide between us whether we want to sink or swim or keep on fighting to try and drown each other.

The secularism that you are talking about is therefore nothing because it does not have any moral authority. We can see the might is right policy through out the world, can we not?

This is why it is better for people to understand islam and try and educate muslims as well so that they could interpret the quran as it ought to be interpreted.

Please get out of mullah type mindset about islam. Islam is not what mullahs say but what is in the quran and the quranic islam needs decoding. Muslims on one hand are not educated enough to decode it and on the other they are suffering from dogmatic indoctrination. So it will be difficult for them to recover from all this on their own.

It should be clear from my explanation that independence you are talking about does not exist in reality. We humans are born and depend on our parents. By the time we are grown up we run for husband or wife and want kids for ourselves, can you see how much independence is really there for us in life? Not much at all. We are most of our lives dependent on each other, so why run away from each other instead of working together to make our lives better that we can?

There are lot of thing you don't know about islam nor do muslims. Not only that but by knowing about islam one also becomes aware of lacks in other ideologies.

Islam is not a faith nor faith based, it is the real stuff ie evidence based rule of law.

Truth can be categorized in five ways.

1)The truth as it is, independent of observer. This does not concern us.

2)self evident truth.
3) proven truth, based upon reliable testimony
4)probable truth, not self evident nor reliable witness based

5)possible truth.

Islam is reliable divine testimony based truth.

Islam can be tested for its truth using scientific method. This is why I said it is not mythical, legendary or superstitious.

Here are rules for interpretation of the quran.

1)It must not be interpreted against laws of nature deliberately.

2)It must not be interpreted against rules of judgement deliberately

3)It must not be interpreted against self evident facts

4)it must be interpreted within its grammatical limits

5)it must be interpreted with in its wider context and according to its purpose.

6)It must be interpreted according to its own explanations ensuring that interpretation does not introduce contradictions in its message.

So long as one sticks to these rules one's interpretation is likely to be the correct one or at least as close to its intended message as possible. All this due to possibility of human error that cannot be eliminated 100%.

These rules have been ignored by mullahs either because they wer ignorant of them or that they deliberately did not use them because if they did then they could not turn the quranic message in to nonsense that they did.

These rules are vitally important because each word has different meanings and which meaning should one choose and why become important for reaching the proper sense of the message.

I can give various examples of wrong interpretations of the quran but I shall leave it for now.

regards and all the best.
 
.
Dear bang galore, it seems as if you have no idea what islam is?

I already explained that islam is a deen not a religion...................................................

1. Believing everything written in the Quran and supporting it is the very definition of having faith in it.
2. To your Islam is a deen point. The rules were applicable for medieval times. It was applicable to government systems in those times. For those who believe in following the deen, secularism does not prevent you from doing so.

For the rest of your lengthy post, the replies would lie in posts #212 and #216.
 
.
Allah was the only one there before he created the creation. He decided to create the universe and people
This is your Religious belief, and you can not say that the evolution of Human being as believed by the rest of the religion is flawed. God has different names in different religion and in Islam its Allha and in Cristianity its Crist and in Hinduism everything beautiful & peaceful is God.
So please do not refer that Allha created Universe, you can instead say that "As per your religious belief or as your fore fathers told you Allha created Universe"

Even animals have right according to the quran because people are made responsible to care for them
And don't you feel that you have sined when you eat meat of an animal. If Quran says that you have to take care of animals, how is Mulims eat meat.

I need you as much as you need me ie we are interlinked and interdependent regardless we love it or hate it. We are therefore stuck with each other. so we can decide between us whether we want to sink or swim or keep on fighting to try and drown each other.
This is what is called as co-existance and we need to let live other to live our lives. some like Janubaba are exceptions to this part
 
.
This is your Religious belief, and you can not say that the evolution of Human being as believed by the rest of the religion is flawed. God has different names in different religion and in Islam its Allha and in Cristianity its Crist and in Hinduism everything beautiful & peaceful is God.
So please do not refer that Allha created Universe, you can instead say that "As per your religious belief or as your fore fathers told you Allha created Universe"


And don't you feel that you have sined when you eat meat of an animal. If Quran says that you have to take care of animals, how is Mulims eat meat.


This is what is called as co-existance and we need to let live other to live our lives. some like Janubaba are exceptions to this part

yes but its our duty to spread it to the whole world and establish its system in the whole world
 
. .
yes but its our duty to spread it to the whole world and establish its system in the whole world

and what next, go conquer Mars :hitwall:

Isn't that the duty of a Prohpet or a preacher? Are you claiming to be one?

Half backed idiots in a peace preaching Religion like Islam is the reason, people world wide brand Muslims as terrorist
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom