Feng Leng
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2017
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
LOL at monkey IQ. China grabbed the Senkaku Islands from Japan in 2010. After 8 years of being sore about it, now the Japanese agree to the status quo. Victory goes to China.Nonsense. The article says It is China that blinks. Granting Japan this and that. The Japanese only agree to establishing of a telephone line. really embarrassing for all people of China.
Would you be willing to agree to the status quo in Paracels?
LOL first you say Japan is strong then you USA will protect Japan. So if they are so strong why do they need protection from USA?Firing ballistic missiles at japan automatically brings in USA.Japanese naval industry as well as south korea's is very active and strong and japan is still among top 5 economies,it just doesn't use much of its military budget.If it wanted it could have a 100 billion dollar budget and nukes within a couple of years.Till now only china has modernized rapidly,japan hasn't done much..but recently there are some stirrings with increases in military budget and helicarriers being converted to f-35 carriers in amendment of constitution.Whether their fighting days are over will depend on if they feel threatened,senkaku islands is just a island in the middle of the sea,but if the japanese feel their homeland under threat they would fight and japan despite its size is more efficient and disciplined than chinese.A large part of chinese fleet ,especially subs is obsolete.Japan trains regularly with NATO navies and throughout the cold war was tasked with defeating soviet pacific fleet .Its by no means a green navy,its staff regularly studies at USN colleges.They still might lose but PLAN would take horrific losses too.
LOL name me three countries with better amphibious capabilities than China.It doesn't matter how many troops you have ,because in case you forgot japan is an island.PLAN has pathetic amphibious capability - can transport a couple of divisions at most - its not even sufficient to take taiwan.If you think you can invade japan with those landing boats in the teeth of land based missiles and aircraft and the japanese navy you are delusional.
LOL what does this conversation have to do with USA? Trump is great friends with Chairman Xi. If anything, USA will ally with China to invade Vietnam and India.PLAN anti submarine warfare capability is very weak.22 japanese soryu and upgraded oyashio would be a nightmare.Japan's industrial capacity is also good,though not as good as yours.They haven't begun a rapid naval rearmament program like yours,if they wanted to they could double their navy in a decade.
And when you brag about industrial capacity always remember no matter how big it is its still no match for japan's big daddy usa.USN is still daddy of PLAN even if you built 100 ships.With 11 supercarriers,10 plus helicarriers,70 plus aegis destroyers,25 odd aegis cruisers,60 state of the art SSNs its a hopeless fight.USN could not only decimate your navy from underwater ,it cut off your oil supplies from middle east at will and blockade you.Your big destroyers and cruisers are helpless against a combined 100 crack submarine flotilla of USN and JMSDF,even if keep the massive US surface fleet out of the equation.
Are you referring to what is happening to India where Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan are all joining China to gangbang India?The scene is similar to 1938 Europe, when one country was making (territorial) demands that others were accommodating to the extent possible. Then the others had enough.They joined together & put Hitler in his place, to shoot his head off. In the present SCS case, only an alliance could do the job. Same should be dome on the border that is shared by a dozen others.