What's new

Vietnam - U.S. bilateral ties

Well, if the China government and people of China have seen they claim too much, to the illogical and irrational, then the peace negotiations will certainly evolve. But in reality, China has always disregards the interests of other countries, they only want to rely on their muscle strength to bully smaller countries surrounding the East Sea (south china sea).

Vietnam has ridiculous claims clearly, claiming islands that are 400 miles away from their shores and with no historical rights to back them up Vietnam is the most illegitimate party in the entire South China Sea claim, i suggest you look at the picture clearly, if it comes to an internationalized approach Vietnam will gain nothing.
 
.
no offense, Vietnam is still a bargain chip between China and US, it is stupid if you think Vietnam has more close relationship with US than Philipine. :coffee:

We have a proverb: More Friends less Enemy.
USA will protect Philippine base on agreement signed.:usflag:
 
.
no offense, Vietnam is still a bargain chip between China and US, it is stupid if you think Vietnam has more close relationship with US than Philipine. :coffee:

It is because of our the communist government want to keep good relations with China. If China continues to bully us, the people of Vietnam will be pressuring the government to change ...
 
.
the whole human nature is might is right,wait for another 10-20 years when China overtook US in all fields,both economically and militarily,all those countries wanting the South China sea will quitely drop their claims,we still need to buy some time.
 
.
We have a proverb: More Friends less Enemy.
USA will protect Philippine base on agreement signed.:usflag:

Why we attack Philipine base? we won't invade philipine,we only need to stop them to exploit the oil in the disputed area, do you think US navy will attack China in this case? You depend too much on US:no:
 
.
Vietnam has ridiculous claims clearly, claiming islands that are 400 miles away from their shores and with no historical rights to back them up Vietnam is the most illegitimate party in the entire South China Sea claim, i suggest you look at the picture clearly, if it comes to an internationalized approach Vietnam will gain nothing.

Our Nguyen Lord and later on Nguyen Dynasty officially controlled Island Hoang Sa and TruongSa from long time in our history, it belong to Vietnam as recognized by internal law. It's out side of 200 miles of Vietnam coastline un der UNCLOS. China is just claim recently. China mainland is far more away than 400 miles.
 
.
Vietnam has ridiculous claims clearly, claiming islands that are 400 miles away from their shores and with no historical rights to back them up Vietnam is the most illegitimate party in the entire South China Sea claim, i suggest you look at the picture clearly, if it comes to an internationalized approach Vietnam will gain nothing.

The parties to respect international law and respect the legitimate interests of other stakeholders, everything will be solved in a satisfactory way. There will be an international court to resolve it, based on evidence and the law, not the words of the spokesperson or the parade of warships...
If the parties are confident in their evidence, why not turn to the consideration of international?
 
.
It is because of our the communist government want to keep good relations with China. If China continues to bully us, the people of Vietnam will be pressuring the government to change ...

So, please press you government firstly, as I know, some big guys in your government are very pro-China
We won't bully Vietnam,but Vietnam should have a clear estimation of yourself as well
If China make a concession too much, our government will also face huge pressure from Chinese people
 
.
US always talks big,in 1974 when China attacked S.Vietnam in Paracel islands,as an treaty ally of S.Vietnam and arch enemy of PRC,upon the begging request for help from S.Vietnamese navy,US just rejected the request and sat there and saw S.Vietnamese navy's annihlation.how much can you count on a country like that?
 
.
Why we attack Philipine base? we won't invade philipine,we only need to stop them to exploit the oil in the disputed area, do you think US navy will attack China in this case? You depend too much on US:no:

If it maybe, is better than with China, traitor.
Globalism is tendency of humankind today in development progress, no one could say he is fully independent from others.:enjoy:
 
.
The parties to respect international law and respect the legitimate interests of other stakeholders, everything will be solved in a satisfactory way. There will be an international court to resolve it, based on evidence and the law, not the words of the spokesperson or the parade of warships...
If the parties are confident in their evidence, why not turn to the consideration of international?

Don't be naive, international court can do nothing, China now is one of several main players in the world.
If international court can solve it, Vietnam and Philipine should have sued China long ago
 
.
If it maybe, is better than with China, traitor.
Globalism is tendency of humankind today in development progress, no one could say he is fully independent from others.:enjoy:

Well, we are traitor, so what the US is? a murder killed millions viets?:disagree:
 
.
Vietnamese government first accepted that Spratly belong to China and later on went back on their word.that's the history
 
.
US always talks big,in 1974 when China attacked S.Vietnam in Paracel islands,as an treaty ally of S.Vietnam and arch enemy of PRC,upon the begging request for help from S.Vietnamese navy,US just rejected the request and sat there and saw S.Vietnamese navy's annihlation.how much can you count on a country like that?

If Northern Vietnam were not kicked them out of Vietnam in 1972, China certainly has no chance of robbery the our islands ..
 
.
US always talks big,in 1974 when China attacked S.Vietnam in Paracel islands,as an treaty ally of S.Vietnam and arch enemy of PRC,upon the begging request for help from S.Vietnamese navy,US just rejected the request and sat there and saw S.Vietnamese navy's annihlation.how much can you count on a country like that?

I wonder about that "high IQ" chinese didn't understood intention of USA with this behabiour. USA is very smart when they let China occupied island of Vietnam by force, becourse USA has been calculated carefully about that. There is reaon USA turn back to the region with new rolle.:welcome:

---------- Post added at 10:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------

Vietnamese government first accepted that Spratly belong to China and later on went back on their word.that's the history

Kido idea.
Both Island belong to Vietnam.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom