What's new

Vietnam to Arm Fishery Surveillance Ships After Standoff With China

stupid annamese...right now it is just a fistfight, but you monkeys pull out a fruit knife, aren't you afraid we spray you with bullets?

Chinese do not dare to do face to face with Japan and US in Pacific Ocean, just bully Viet and Pynoy. Cowardice chinese big mouth.
 
.
Waiting for you, when you are beaten with weapons, do not cry to others again:-)
Who cried in this sad incident in 1990 in Gaven reef ??:coffee:
November 7, 1990, I found the Southern Command Nansha reefs lost radio contact.After the situation was reported to the South China Sea Fleet deployed immediately went to see the ship. Under the notification, the reef is a unit of Marines stationed in the preparation of 12 people, then should be 11 people (one reason temporarily off the reef). Inspectors found that the bodies of six soldiers on the reef, and another five people missing. Missing persons including reef Chang allegiance, vice reef long and correspondents. In addition to the personnel on the reef, the reef warrior Xu Huiping Yong Department reef due to the treatment of burns and survived. Inspectors found multiple bullet holes in the room, indicating where the fighting occurred. Then they picked up and from the underwater reef a few rifles, these guns are all our military garrison personnel standard rifle.

This event was caused no small vibration in the army, immediately set up by the South China Sea Fleet of the senior leadership responsible for the investigation team, in-depth and comprehensive investigation, and make rehabilitation work. Findings are confidential at the time, unable to understand the outside.

This strange incident, even if insiders are also controversial. Is encountered enemy special forces raid, fighting or other emergency occurs, the truth has not yet been fully understood.This incident, I analyzed are the following possibilities:

1, most likely by the army special forces is. Vietnamese troops in 1988, "3.14" Red Reef of Nansha sea battle at a disadvantage, must look for an opportunity to retaliate. But then I Nansha garrison high vigilance and patrolling troops, combat readiness, they are hard to find opportunities. I combined the naval prisoners of war captured in Zhanjiang Nansha trial, our government has not yet handed over to Vietnam. Since 1990, our military posture in Nansha is clear, I observe activity patterns reef and the ship's officers that they have already mastered their "revenge about" conditions ripe. According to common sense traces of science, this action does not leave any suspicious items, indicating that other means quite clever. Does not exclude the other is the master shooting, fighting, diving techniques, and even combat may wear body armor. If this action as a planned and premeditated military action, should be considered very successful. But not arbitrary conclusion is that after the successful implementation of this action the enemy, meritorious officers must reward, JiaGuanJinJue, will follow along with the media reports, trumpeted the so-called "heroic deeds", but did not. Things over the past 20 years, information and networks so advanced, Vietnam had not been seen in any public media reported. They do a job well done is confidential?

In addition to the newspaper, the Philippines, Malaysia, accounting for part of my Nansha Islands and, in theory, its military personnel have started to attack me in the reef may be. But the two countries have maintained friendly relations with China over the they dare decorum skin, desperate to take such a big political and military risks? Media in both countries are more open, we were not given any clues, so many years, it is no reflection.

Source: Who killed 11 Chinese troops in Gaven Reefs in 1990 ?

If it were me I would do one of two things, either arm the vessels and never send them to actual hot spots or just armed but strict orders of never using it, or just simply not arming them.

Reason is a few machine guns or even missiles are not changing anything, it's not like the difference between China and Vietnam is these few guns.

I understand this move, if the objective is to show Vietnam is doing something, however, I doubt the government is stupid enough to actually fire, even China is waiting for others to fire the first shot, be foolish for Vietnam to fire the first shot.

So I doubt actual armed confrontation is the objective here.
Our Govt may not want, but our generals, our soldiers want to fire and they can conduct a secret raid sometimes, who knows :pop:
 
.
I think Japanese have the right to sink your ships as well, as soon as you approach the senkakus.
Arm ship approaching our island, that is an invasion and we reserve the right to sink it.
 
.
You arm your ship and it turns into a military ship, and then we can launch a anti-ship missile for that reason
It is you idiot that came with warships into our EEZ.
 
. . .
Most Vietnamese members here, maybe except @xesy, can talk nothing but their so called sovereignty. They have little involvement on other topics, they only care their own interests.
 
.
Arm ship approaching our island, that is an invasion and we reserve the right to sink it.
We will sink ur ship too, let war start and we can sink all China merchant ships passing by our EEZ :pop:

Seems like all China merchant ships from Middle east to China must pass through our EEZ
chinal1.jpg
 
.
We will sink ur ship too, let war start and we can sink all China merchant ships passing by our EEZ :pop:
LOL!

Vietnamese is like a little guy that always act tough and warmonger against a taller, bigger, stronger actor. Joke? :lol:
 
.
LOL!

Vietnamese is like a little guy that always act tough and warmonger against a taller, bigger, stronger actor. Joke? :lol:
China is bigger, but not stronger. In last conflict near Paracel isl, people saw that ur huge forces ( but poorly trained ) got humiliated lost against our small but brave forces

Thats the second lost for huge China forces after 1979 war, when China used 600,000 elite PLA troops against abt 200,000 troops (mostly border guards and women militia force) but still lost :pop:
 
.
China is bigger, but not stronger. In last conflict near Paracel isl, people saw that ur huge forces ( but poorly trained ) got humiliated lost against our small but brave forces

Thats the second lost for huge China forces after 1979 war, when China used 600,000 elite PLA troops against abt 200,000 troops (mostly border guards and women militia force) but still lost :pop:
Oh look at the little guy trying to win a moral victory. You win the last conflict in Paracel but why didn't you gain anything at Paracel? LOL

1979 again. Is that the only thing that make you little guy proud? :lol:
 
.
Oh look at the little guy trying to win a moral victory. You win the last conflict in Paracel but why didn't you gain anything at Paracel? LOL

1979 again. Is that the only thing that make you little guy proud? :lol:
We gain more support from more countries in the world specially from US-JP coz they believe we can contain China easily now. We dont need to take back Paracel now coz it doesnt have important location there. U can keep it now, we will take back when China collapse like Soviet union:pop:

Of course we r so pround of 1979 war, just like we proud of our Victory in the oil rig conflict . No more small country in the world can use small but well trained and brave forces to defeat a much bigger enemy forces like VietNam :P
 
. .
We again more support from more countries in the world specially from US-JP coz they believe we can contain China easily now. We dont need to take back Paracel now coz it doesnt have important location there. U can keep it now, we will take back when China collapse like Soviet union:pop:

Of course we r so pround of 1979 war, just like we proud of our Victory in the oil rig conflict . No more small country in the world can use small but well trained and brave forces to defeat a much bigger enemy forces like VietNam :P
So the little tough guy talk is rather about hiding behind our American friend's back? LOL Would you accept eating one of our nuke in exchange for you to keep one island in Paracel? How about this deal. We will give you one island if you can eat one nuke. The more you can eat, of course you gain more island. Good deal?

Color revolution is coming to you. Do not say I didn't warn you first here.

This is what separate the real big player and the small player. You are happy if you can resist a force, win a few battle. The big player when they play chess, it is about the geopolitical result. Unfortunately for you, we are a big winner during the Cold War.
 
.
So the little tough guy talk is rather about hiding behind our American friend's back? LOL Would you accept eating one of our nuke in exchange for you to keep one island in Paracel? How about this deal. We will give you one island if you can eat one nuke. The more you can eat, of course you gain more island. Good deal?

Color revolution is coming to you. Do not say I didn't warn you first here.

This is what separate the real big player and the small player. You are happy if you can resist a force, win a few battle. The big player when they play chess, it is about the geopolitical result. Unfortunately for you, we are a big winner during the Cold War.
If ur leader dare to nuke VN, then we will enrich uranium to 99 % and nuke u back. But ur leader Xi is corrupted, so he wont dare to die in nuke war with us.

So, just simply wait for China collapse, then Paracel isl will go back to VN

And big doesnt mean he is chess player. In fact, China is just a cheap chess, divided into 2 parts by US, while VN defeated US and unified the nation:pop:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom