Vietnam, India Boost Naval Ties to Counter China

[ChineseTiger1986]

back then both of our economies were socialist inspired we with License Raj following protectionism and all that etc you made economic reforms we made economic reforms both of our economies are the 2 fastest growing the world

we admit we are not at your level but there is no way in hell you can invade us like you did in 1962 and have the same results

The result will only be worse than in 1962 for India.

You didn't take your opportunity to catch up with China, you better to stop talking and working hard right now. Otherwise, it will be too late.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

and how old is that INSAS link? 3 -4 years old? the IA Rajput regiment demonstrated the capabilities of INSAS in Alaska and if it is a POS like you claim how come Oman Bhutan and Nepal use them?

 

[LiberalAtheist]

The result will only be worse than in 1962 for India.

You didn't take your opportunity to catch up with China, you better to stop talking and working hard right now. Otherwise, it will be too late.

one thing India has just like China is manpower we will fight till the last man till our last breath China tried to take Sikkim from us in 1967 that failed we still have AP and Sikkim today what u gonna do about that?

also we have quality the result will in no way be the same we are building Infrastructure moving fighter jets to North east etc idk what CCP tells you guys but open your eyes to modern developments

 

[tanlixiang28776]

you might as well say all delta wing fighters are copied off the mirage then

other than looks what else is similar of the air frames? does Mirage air frame use composites like LCA? like i said LCA air frame is 100% indigenous built by us using Indian composites

Does J 10 use composites from Israel? Does it use steered array radar? Does it use F 414s? Does it have a half circle intake? Does it have any air frame similarities besides the delta canard configuration? Yet you call that a copy. That is far more differences then between the LCA and Mirage.

Did you notice at all that I switched the descriptions of the LCA and Mirage 5?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

one thing India has just like China is manpower we will fight till the last man till our last breath China tried to take Sikkim from us in 1967 that failed we still have AP and Sikkim today what u gonna do about that?

A poorly armed China in 1962 can beat the hell out of you guys, then imagine a fully industrialized monster of today.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

J-11 and SU-27 well see one is a Russian original the other one is a Chinese knock off

 

[tanlixiang28776]

J-11 and SU-27 well see one is a Russian original the other one is a Chinese knock off

Russia licensed 200 Su 27s to China. Unless you are saying license production of SU 30MKI is also a Knockoff.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

J-11 and SU-27 well see one is a Russian original the other one is a Chinese knock off

The above one is J-11A, and we had paid our licence fee to Russia for producing that aircraft, which is not copying by definition.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

Does J 10 use composites from Israel? Does it use steered array radar? Does it use F 414s? Does it have a half circle intake? Does it have any air frame similarities besides the delta canard configuration? Yet you call that a copy. That is far more differences then between the LCA and Mirage.

Did you notice at all that I switched the descriptions of the LCA and Mirage 5?

Asia Times

Defence Security Report

 

[LiberalAtheist]

The above one is J-11A, and we had paid our licence fee to Russia for producing that aircraft, which is not copying by definition.

really?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Asia Times

Defence Security Report

Do any of those sources provide anything more than speculation?

I can speculate just as well with the French assistance in the LCA, among other countries.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

really?

The SU 27s Russia licensed were incapable of ground attack.

So we put that feature in. We're not going to pay the Russians to provide what they should have from the beginning. You're free to though.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

A poorly armed China in 1962 can beat the hell out of you guys, then imagine a fully industrialized monster of today.

poorly armed? WTF you guys had 80,000 men in that war we barely had a division to fight up against Tanks artillery of the PLA....... some of our soldiers were still using 303 lee enfield rifles while PLA soldiers had Type 56 rifles if anyone was poorly armed equipped and poorly supported it was us

besides don't forget about the political background of the time Nehru was foolish and let Zhou Enlai stab him in the back despite CONgress being in power today they are not the same naive people like they were 50 years ago things are different now the after math of that border war like 1967 Chola incident is proof

 

[LiberalAtheist]

Do any of those sources provide anything more than speculation?

I can speculate just as well with the French assistance in the LCA, among other countries.

thats exactly what you've been doing SPECULATING with no proof other than pictures see thats the thing about you guys whenever you do something and someone else does the same thing back you get your panties in a bunch why is that ???

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

poorly armed? WTF you guys had 80,000 men in that war we barely had a division to fight up against Tanks artillery of the PLA....... some of our soldiers were still using 303 lee enfield rifles while PLA soldiers had Type 56 rifles if anyone was poorly armed equipped and poorly supported it was us

besides don't forget about the political background of the time Nehru was foolish and let Zhou Enlai stab him in the back despite CONgress being in power today they are not the same naive people like they were 50 years ago things are different now the after math of that border war like 1967 Chola incident is proof

Nehru already stabbed China in the back in 1959 by hosting our largest separatist group. So 1962 was no surprise to him, he was only surprised that he lost.

He allowed India to be defeated and to lose territory, all for a political chip (the Dalai Lama) who now says that he does not even support Tibetan independence.