William Hung
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,465
- Reaction score
- 16
hey fast forward to 3:48 (my grandparents burning your grand parents), enjoy the footage.
Too boring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hey fast forward to 3:48 (my grandparents burning your grand parents), enjoy the footage.
No, Leopard MBT is OKay, it depend on how VN use tanks.Yea lol.. thats why @Toss The Lemon said it's better for VN to develop its own heavy industry. Then VN can develop a tank for its own environment, not a tank designed for someone else's environment.
So against PLA's 3rd gen, you think Abrams are better for VN? less mobility but better armour protection. Both use the same gun.
I think Tanks made in China is low quality. Thailand has dropped imported tanks from china (1988) in to sea .
View attachment 154507
No, Leopard MBT is OKay, it depend on how VN use tanks.
LOL ... it seems u clearly understand MBT design background the "Cold War". Yes u r right ! During "Cold War" time, Germany+France and U.S + Britain they have different duties to defense the Europe when face USSR tanks, the job of Germany/France MBTs is to delay Russian T62/T72/T80 tanks and wait for main principal tank forces (Challenger/Abrams MBTs) coming from Britain and U.S to support them, their tanks focus on high-mobile but less thick armors.
Germany Leopard-IIA7 will be better, A6 55.9ton ==> A7 67ton, im sure German add amours on their latest Leopard II tank.
Yea lol.. thats why @Toss The Lemon said it's better for VN to develop its own heavy industry. Then VN can develop a tank for its own environment, not a tank designed for someone else's environment.
So against PLA's 3rd gen, you think Abrams are better for VN? less mobility but better armour protection. Both use the same gun.
Yes we all know the Russian t-55 are so much better made, that is why Vietnam still using them?
View attachment 154521
Definitely, VN should design a medium tank of 30-35 tons for mountain terrain.
why not ? when it is good for training our soldirs.
View attachment 154531
View attachment 154532
View attachment 154533
View attachment 154536 View attachment 154536
yes we also train our soldiers, but what do you have for your soldiers to go to war? not the T-59s build by us right?
Really? VN is buying a Sprut? how much do they cost?
Why do they bother upgrading the T-54 if they're planning to get the Sprut? might as well save that $290million and buy more Spruts, or upgrade its armour.
Why do they bother upgrading the T-54 if they're planning to get the Sprut? might as well save that $290million and buy more Spruts, or upgrade its armour.
What is the terrain on the Viet-China border like? Isn't it a river delta?
I don´t think it is zero if the conflict escalates. the PLA sent over 500 tanks into the battle during the war of 1979.Actually, I think it will be a waste of money for VN to buy Abrams or Leopard 2a7. The chance of PLA tanks rolling down into VN is almost zero. Tank is only needed for occupation.
Better to spend money on other things, like SAM and fighter jets.