Video summary of JIT findings

[Imad.Khan]

https://www.facebook.com/

After watching this and reading the JIT report, people that still follow these criminals then i only have 1 word for them " Begharat"

@SBD-3 @Tesky @Fallen King @Attock @Mrc @SUPARCO @BATMAN @Proudpakistaniguy @Syed.Ali.Haider @Jinn Baba @I FLY HIGH @Danish saleem @singlefighter

 

[VCheng]

The JIT report has not been released in full. Without Volume X, it cannot be judged whether what they say is reliable enough to be considered, or not. Mounting a valid defense is not possible without full disclosure of the report.

 

[abp94]

The JIT report has not been released in full. Without Volume X, it cannot be judged whether what they say is reliable enough to be considered, or not. Mounting a valid defense is not possible without full disclosure of the report.

Dude, we get it. The whole report has not been released, still arguments to be made, the rest of us do want to speculate, you don't, we're not asking you too.

 

[VCheng]

spec·u·late
ˈspekyəˌlāt/
verb

1. 1.
   form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Tagging more baboons

@Icewolf @My-Analogous @kabooter_maila @Lavrentiy @cb4 @Ranasikander

The JIT report has not been released in full. Without Volume X, it cannot be judged whether what they say is reliable enough to be considered, or not. Mounting a valid defense is not possible without full disclosure of the report.

So let me reconfirm, Your logic is that since vol 10 has not been released we should ignore all the other 9 volumes of proof, Is that correct?

 

[VCheng]

So let me reconfirm, Your logic is that since vol 10 has not been released we should ignore all the other 9 volumes of proof, Is that correct?

Most of the other 9 volumes contain a particular narrative with any sources of confirmation being contained in Volume X, from what I understand. The process behind the conclusions of the report must be explained clearly for all sides to assess, before a valid defense can be mounted for a fair and due process. Keeping a part of the report hidden from scrutiny is not fair.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Most of the other 9 volumes contain a particular narrative with any sources of confirmation being contained in Volume X, from what I understand. The process behind the conclusions of the report must be explained clearly for all sides to assess, before a valid defense can be mounted for a fair and due process. Keeping a part of the report hidden from scrutiny is not fair.

So basically you haven't even bothered to read the report and have come to a forgone conclusion that it contains a narrative that is against your ideology.

Each volume contains proofs with sources to back them including confirmations received from officials of other countries. Some volumes contains the transcripts of each respondent that was called in by the JIT.

 

[VCheng]

So basically you haven't even bothered to read the report and have come to a forgone conclusion that it contains a narrative that is against your ideology.

Each volume contains proofs with sources to back them including confirmations received from officials of other countries. Some volumes contains the transcripts of each respondent that was called in by the JIT.

I have no ideology or bias since I can afford to be truly impartial. Keeping a part of the report hidden from scrutiny casts aspersions on the fairness of the process, that is all.

 

[Imad.Khan]

I have no ideology or bias since I can afford to be truly impartial. Keeping a part of the report hidden from scrutiny casts aspersions on the fairness of the process, that is all.

So you do admit that you haven't even bothered to read the report?

 

[VCheng]

So you do admit that you haven't even bothered to read the report?

I am waiting to comment since the report is before the Supreme Court, and I wish to be patient to let them do their work without pressure or bias.

 

[Imad.Khan]

I am waiting to comment since the report is before the Supreme Court, and I wish to be patient to let them do their work without pressure or bias.

that doesn't answer my question. Did you read the report? A simple yes or no would suffice

 

[Attock]

https://www.facebook.com/

After watching this and reading the JIT report, people that still follow these criminals then i only have 1 word for them " Begharat"

@SBD-3 @Tesky @Fallen King @Attock @Mrc @SUPARCO @BATMAN @Proudpakistaniguy @Syed.Ali.Haider @Jinn Baba @I FLY HIGH @Danish saleem @singlefighter

Nothing is final before supreme court decision.

 

[Danish saleem]

https://www.facebook.com/

After watching this and reading the JIT report, people that still follow these criminals then i only have 1 word for them " Begharat"

@SBD-3 @Tesky @Fallen King @Attock @Mrc @SUPARCO @BATMAN @Proudpakistaniguy @Syed.Ali.Haider @Jinn Baba @I FLY HIGH @Danish saleem @singlefighter

brother,

for your kind information i voted for PTI in 2013, and i am still in worker list of PTI, thats very important for me, to tell before commenting because IK promoted the culture of intolerance, that if u criticize PTI or its policies then they think that i am supporter of PML N.

about the JIT, as very small student of Law, i knew that JIT not have any legal cover , because they Investigated without following any law, like they investigating as per FIA Act, or NAB Act, or any other law, so its a Error!

about the findings of JIT, let the court decide, who r me n u or media channels, to issue fatwas, when proceedings are already underway!

Yes after SC decision, its a right of every Pakistani to use all legal rights, if he not satisfied with decision, so in my opinion that case will be referred to NAB or Accountability Court, and may b SC will ask PM to set a sight till the case Proceedings were underway in NAB or Accountability Court, and if PML N decided to go for Appeal in larger bench, then we have to wait for the decision of larger bench!

 

[Mrc]

NS is now just being stubborn .... it's far better to resign and take a controlled exit ... minimize damages... get nisar or ahsa iqbal elected in short term and Shabbat Sharif can contest 2018 as New pm candidate... letting court do it is more damaging

 

[Imad.Khan]

brother,

for your kind information i voted for PTI in 2013, and i am still in worker list of PTI, thats very important for me, to tell before commenting because IK promoted the culture of intolerance, that if u criticize PTI or its policies then they think that i am supporter of PML N.

about the JIT, as very small student of Law, i knew that JIT not have any legal cover , because they Investigated without following any law, like they investigating as per FIA Act, or NAB Act, or any other law, so its a Error!

about the findings of JIT, let the court decide, who r me n u or media channels, to issue fatwas, when proceedings are already underway!

Yes after SC decision, its a right of every Pakistani to use all legal rights, if he not satisfied with decision, so in my opinion that case will be referred to NAB or Accountability Court, and may b SC will ask PM to set a sight till the case Proceedings were underway in NAB or Accountability Court, and if PML N decided to go for Appeal in larger bench, then we have to wait for the decision of larger bench!

I have heard you say that you voted for PTI in 2013, but thats means nothing when you are always supporting N-League. As for criticizing PTI, i criticize PTI alot but no one calls me a baboon.

As for JIT not having any legal cover, it has the cover of the SC, can you get any higher legal cover than that? Secondly technicalities are not important, its the findings of the JIT that are more important. And JIT findings are head spinning, even after this if people support N-League than they have to be begharat.