What's new

(video)Fort Detrick Enigma

.
Recently US democrats refuse to declassify Covid origins. I'm getting suspicious.
 
.
No, the US didn't develop the Covid vaccine before the pandemic. You are just spreading nonsensical illogical Chinese BS. If we had the vaccine why are we the leader of covid deaths in the world while China has the lowest?

If anything this proves China is responsible for sleeper cells planted across the world springing the virus on foreign populations in mostly Western countries and then wiping out their PPE supplies to leave them defenseless.

It's long been known for decades China has sleeper cell units to engage in multiple biological warfare wave attacks in Western countries. So do the Russians.

An attack has long been anticipated...and sure enough it is in full-swing. China will close its doors again and tell their citizens "The laowai world is too dangerous..let us keep them all far away again...like we did for centuries". They will then use the Great Firewall to cutoff the news from the outside world to their citizens and unleash a hellish final variant on the outside world without their people knowing the truth.

The Uighur situation is simply a test of where the holes are in the control of information to their populace. They have knocked all those nails down. It will be simple now to spring their doomsday plan.



Oh and the above was written using YOUR style of painting pictures without any proof or evidence. Just listing and throwing around so called "facts" that you pull out of nowhere. :rolleyes1:

First look at Moderna patents .
Patents | Moderna, Inc. (modernatx.com)
click here to see
The link is here not any CN BS.
Don't tell me Morderna patent is also from CN? Not hard to comprehend right?




Quote: Originally Posted by VikingsToValhalla Nearly all of the vaccine patents that make up Moderna's mRNA covid-19 vaccine were filed before December 2019. How is this possible? How did Moderna know there would be a coronavirus outbreak? Why were they already working on a vaccine for Covid-19 before Covid-19 officially existed? This is from Moderna's official website regarding the 7 patents that make up their mRNA Covid-19 vaccine: https://www.modernatx.com/patents Click on all 7 patents and look at the filing date for each patent (on the left side). Ignore the date of when the patent was awarded (top right), what's important is the date when the patent was filed. In 6 of the patents, the filing dates were long before December 2019, which is when the new Covid-19 virus suddenly emerged (or so we're told). Only one of the patents (the second on the list) shows a filing date after Dec. 2019, showing of Feb 28, 2020. Anyone care to explain what is going on? The patent on the Kung Flu 1984 was made years prior to that.



Read more: https://www.city-data.com/forum/pol...odernas-covid-19-vaccine-patents-were-17.html
 
.

Listen to Obama in 2014 he predicted that 5 years from now meaning 2019 a pandemic like Spanish flu will emerged. US president has prophecy power ??? Or they had already plan this ahead. That is why they also had developed the Covid vaccine prior to the pandemic.
 
.
View attachment 767953

Look...the covid19 patent appeared on 2015-10-13

No, that's the Priority date.
This is the file date
2020-05-17 Application filed


The terms filing date and priority date are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same. The filing date is the date when a patent application is first filed at a patent office. The priority date, sometimes called the “effective filing date”, is the date used to establish the novelty and/or obviousness of a particular invention relative to other art.

The priority date may be earlier than the actual filing date of an application. If an application claims priority to an earlier parent application, then its priority date may be the same as the parent.

There are a number of situations where a patent application may claim priority to an earlier application. These include:
  • Continuation applications (including continuations, divisionals, and CIPs). A patent application may claim priority to an earlier filed parent application. When this occurs, the priority date of the new application is usually the same as the priority date of the parent application.
  • Domestic applications based on foreign or international filings. If a patent application is first filed in a foreign country, or as an international (PCT) application, and then filed domestically (usually within a year the foreign or international filing), then the application that is filed domestically may claim the filing date of the application in the foreign country as its priority date.
  • Patent filings based on US provisional patent applications. In the US, an applicant may file a provisional patent application, and then file a full-length application within one year. In this case, the priority date for the full-length application is the date of the provisional application filing.
In many cases, a patent application claims priority to a series of applications. For example, a continuation application may claim priority to a parent utility application, which claims priority to a US provisional application. The new application may then claim priority to the first filed application in the series, which in this case, is the provisional application.

If a patent application is an original, non-provisional patent application, not a continuation application, and not previously filed in another country, its filing date is usually the same as its priority date.
 
Last edited:
.
what's important is the date when the patent was filed. In 6 of the patents, the filing dates were long before December 2019, which is when the new Covid-19 virus suddenly emerged (or so we're told). Only one of the patents (the second on the list) shows a filing date after Dec. 2019, showing of Feb 28, 2020. Anyone care to explain what is going on?

Did you even bother to look at the patents listed???

1) Filed : Jun . 12 , 2019
MODIFIED POLYNUCLEOTIDES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SECRETED PROTEINS

2) Filed : Feb. 28 , 2020
BETACORONAVIRUS MRNA VACCINE

3) Filed : Jun . 12 , 2019
MODIFIED POLYNUCLEOTIDES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SECRETED PROTEINS

4) Filed : Dec . 18 , 2017
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

5) Filed : Jun . 11 , 2018
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

6) Filed : Apr . 21 , 2017
MODIFIED NUCLEOSIDES , NUCLEOTIDES , AND NUCLEIC ACIDS , AND USES THEREOF

7) Filed : Mar . 31 , 2017
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

Only one of the patents you listed mentions Covid19. The rest are pretty generic and can be applied to other vaccines as well.



BTW apparently you have already forgotten the timeline of Covid19 since Feb. 28 , 2020 is AFTER it was identified and handed over to the WHO not before.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) isolated the first viral strain of the novel coronavirus and handed it over to the World Health Organization (WHO) as early as January 12, 2020, media reported.
 
Last edited:
.
No, that's the Priority date.
This is the file date
2020-05-17 Application filed


The terms filing date and priority date are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same. The filing date is the date when a patent application is first filed at a patent office. The priority date, sometimes called the “effective filing date”, is the date used to establish the novelty and/or obviousness of a particular invention relative to other art.

The priority date may be earlier than the actual filing date of an application. If an application claims priority to an earlier parent application, then its priority date may be the same as the parent.

There are a number of situations where a patent application may claim priority to an earlier application. These include:
  • Continuation applications (including continuations, divisionals, and CIPs). A patent application may claim priority to an earlier filed parent application. When this occurs, the priority date of the new application is usually the same as the priority date of the parent application.
  • Domestic applications based on foreign or international filings. If a patent application is first filed in a foreign country, or as an international (PCT) application, and then filed domestically (usually within a year the foreign or international filing), then the application that is filed domestically may claim the filing date of the application in the foreign country as its priority date.
  • Patent filings based on US provisional patent applications. In the US, an applicant may file a provisional patent application, and then file a full-length application within one year. In this case, the priority date for the full-length application is the date of the provisional application filing.
In many cases, a patent application claims priority to a series of applications. For example, a continuation application may claim priority to a parent utility application, which claims priority to a US provisional application. The new application may then claim priority to the first filed application in the series, which in this case, is the provisional application.

If a patent application is an original, non-provisional patent application, not a continuation application, and not previously filed in another country, its filing date is usually the same as its priority date.
are you saying the filing date of covid19 dated much earlier than 2015 according to The priority date may be earlier than the actual filing date of an application.?
 
.
Did you even bother to look at the patents listed???

1) Filed : Jun . 12 , 2019
MODIFIED POLYNUCLEOTIDES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SECRETED PROTEINS

2) Filed : Feb. 28 , 2020
BETACORONAVIRUS MRNA VACCINE

3) Filed : Jun . 12 , 2019
MODIFIED POLYNUCLEOTIDES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SECRETED PROTEINS

4) Filed : Dec . 18 , 2017
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

5) Filed : Jun . 11 , 2018
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

6) Filed : Apr . 21 , 2017
MODIFIED NUCLEOSIDES , NUCLEOTIDES , AND NUCLEIC ACIDS , AND USES THEREOF

7) Filed : Mar . 31 , 2017
COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

Only one of the patents you listed mentions Covid19. The rest are pretty generic and can be applied to other vaccines too.



BTW apparently you have already forgotten the timeline of Covid19 since Feb. 28 , 2020 is AFTER it was identified not before. Why are you completely clueless on the Coronavirus timeline???? Have you been living under a rock?


A novel coronavirus was identified as the cause by Chinese authorities on 7 January 2020 and was temporarily named “2019-nCoV”.
Friend even English is not my mother tougue even stone and pebbles know how to read.

There are 7 patents in order to produce the vaccines.

You are picking the 2 patent printing filing date on dating Feb 2020 that is date reapplication of Jun 2019.

How come modena is filing coronavirus vaccine related of since 2017?

Birds, butterflies and even ants can tell vaccine development started even in 2017. And reapplication since it was rejected at earlier date.

Using simple logic and not CN BS as you claimed. All in black and white 7 patents for vaccines starting filing is 2017.

US is the culprit of causing millions of death from their greedy scientific and pharma company messing around with nature. Attempting to alter nature protein.

Not supprising if it was Mike Pompeo who released the virus. Remember the moment when Trump walked to a church and holding a bible and having a prayers. Look at Trump tell me normally he is so holy? Why? Asking for God forgiveness for the committed sins?
 
.
are you saying the filing date of covid19 dated much earlier than 2015 according to The priority date may be earlier than the actual filing date of an application.?

No, I'm saying you are mixing up the Priority Date with the Filing Date
Your screenshot:
Screen Shot 2021-08-07 at 8.37.16 AM.jpg


Yes, but that is not the filing date.
Here it is:

Screen Shot 2021-08-07 at 8.39.41 AM.jpg


The patent was filed May 17th, 2020. Long after Covid was isolated. So there isn't anything unusual at all.


Both of you are determined to twist "facts" into a smoking gun that simply doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:
.
No, I'm saying you are mixing up the Priority Date with the Filing Date
Your screenshot:
View attachment 768014

Yes, but that is not the filing date.
Here it is:

View attachment 768016

The patent was filed May 17th, 2020. Long after Covid was isolated. So there isn't anything unusual at all.


Both of you are determined to twist "facts" into a smoking gun that simply doesn't exist.
so the priority date of 2015 is the earliest filing date. That shows covid19 is the work of USA
 
.
There are 7 patents in order to produce the vaccines.

Yes, and six of them are also probably used in the R&D of other vaccines.

How come modena is filing coronavirus vaccine related of since 2017?

Moderna has been around since 2010 researching methods of creating MRNA vaccines. I would expect them to be filing patents on their technology. Those patents are not specific to coronavirus. They are specific to MRNA.

Since their covid vaccine is their first released human MRNA vaccine they are tying their current process patents to it on their website's patent page (note this isn't a covid patent page..this is their general patent page).
 
Last edited:
.
so the priority date of 2015 is the earliest filing date. That shows covid19 is the work of USA

Your logic is amazing. Where does it ever mention Covid19 in any filings before May 5th, 2020. How do you get 1 + 1 = 3?

If anything it is saying process/methods previously submitted for patents for testing for viruses (like SARS) can now be applied for tracking down Covid19.
 
Last edited:
.
Your logic is amazing. Where does it ever mention Covid19 in any filings before May 5th, 2020. How do you get 1 + 1 = 3?

If anything it is saying process/methods previously submitted for patents for testing for viruses can now be applied for tracking down Covid19.

The filing is on jun2019 then they do refilling in 2020. You are just playing with the date see below not a CN media but US media. Stop twist and turn. Stop denying and say is CN BS. See below:


Confidential Documents reveal Moderna sent mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate to University Researchers weeks before emergence of Covid-19
BY DAILY EXPOSE ON JUNE 18, 2021 • ( 75 COMMENTS )
Listen Now



audioplace.me logo
A confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina in 2019, nineteen days prior to the emergence of the alleged Covid-19 causing virus in Wuhan, China.

The confidentially agreement which can be viewed here states that providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) agreed to tranfer ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients ‘The Universisty of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019.

image-69.png
Found on page 105 of the agreement
The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019.

image-70.png
Recipient signatories found on page 107
The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am. The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however this signature was not dated.

image-72.png
NIAID signatories found on page 107
The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019.

image-73.png
Moderna signatories found on page 108
All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”.

image-74.png

It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19. So why was an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate developed by Moderna being transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

The same Moderna that have had an mRNA coronavirus vaccine authorised for emergency use only in both the United Kingdom and United States to allegedly combat Covid-19.

What did Moderna know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and evidence suggests there hasn’t been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020 and 2021 either.

Considering the fact a faulty PCR test has been used at a high cycle rate, hospitals have been empty in comparison to previous years, statistics show just 0.2% of those allegedly infected have died within 28 days of an alleged positive test result, the majority of those deaths by a mile have been people over the age of 85, and a mass of those deaths were caused by a drug called midazolam, which causes respiratory depression, and respiratory arrest.

Perhaps Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases would like to explain themselves in a court of law?



Confidential Documents reveal Moderna sent mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate to University Researchers weeks before emergence of Covid-19 – Daily Expose
Originally Posted by VikingsToValhalla Confidential Documents reveal Moderna sent mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate to University Researchers weeks before emergence of Covid-19 https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/18...e-of-covid-19/ It appears as though Moderna and NIAID sent samples of an mRNA coronavirus vaccine to researchers at the University of North Carolina weeks before the Covid-19 outbreak in China in December of 2019. Just a coincidence I suppose? "It appears" they did, or they did? Was it A coronavirus vaccine or was it a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2?

Read more: https://www.city-data.com/forum/pol...odernas-covid-19-vaccine-patents-were-17.html
Confidential Documents reveal Moderna sent mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate to University Researchers weeks before emergence of Covid-19 – Daily Expose

Don't tell me the media from UK is BS , when they presented the actual document...
 
.
Yes, and six of them are also probably used in the R&D of other vaccines.



Moderna has been around since 2010 researching methods of creating MRNA vaccines. I would expect them to be filing patents on their technology. Those patents are not specific to coronavirus. They are specific to MRNA.

Since their covid vaccine is their first released human MRNA vaccine they are tying their current process patents to it on their website's patent page (note this isn't a covid patent page..this is their general patent page).
@"Hamartia Antidote, well said yes US love to play and mess around with synthetic method altered nature and GOD creation. That is why strange viruses emerges.
 
.
Confidential Documents reveal Moderna sent mRNA Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate to University Researchers weeks before emergence of Covid-19

Yes, and if you look closer it says it was MERS-CoV which has been studied in labs worldwide since ~2012. :rolleyes1:

Keep those dead-end smoking guns coming!!! The more debunked the sillier you look!
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom