What's new

Uzbekistan has reportedly cut off 60% of its electricity supplies to Afghanistan.

.
It will be better to use UN designation when it comes to discuss about a country. Such provocative and useless branding wouldn't attract much attention neither serves the purpose of title being on subject & about parties involved.

Regards,
 
.
It will be better to use UN designation when it comes to discuss about a country. Such provocative and useless branding wouldn't attract much attention neither serves the purpose of title being on subject & about parties involved.

Regards,
Also since @Titanium100 keeps calling me false flagger can you please fix my flags for once and for all?
 
. .
It will be better to use UN designation when it comes to discuss about a country. Such provocative and useless branding wouldn't attract much attention neither serves the purpose of title being on subject & about parties involved.

Regards,

May I know your views on the UNSC designations of the Gaddafi and Assad systems / governments ?
 
.
May I know your views on the UNSC designations of the Gaddafi and Assad systems / governments ?

Check with the UN by yourself or if at-least, an influenced designation is not used merely to serve the purpose of pro-claimed western democracy police.
 
.
If the Afghan economy continues to capsize, then a large influx of people into Pakistan will be inevitable. Sudden increase in population of Pakistani border lands will strain the countries capital resources. Pakistan should build infrastructure and export its surplus power to Afghanistan at subsidized rate. It may cost some coin in the short term, but will be better for both parties in the long run.
 
.
3kxcfv.jpg


Uzbekistan be like - "Come here get your choppers"
 
.
Sorry but you are giving contradictory opinion. First you chastised @Reichsmarschall because he wasn't charitable about the Taliban regime so you told him to use UN designation for it, and now you are being critical about the UN which, as you indicated, is essentially a rubber stamp for Western governments' "democracy" police.

No dude. You are so wrong on this and seems to have something else on your mind. Let me be straight here. We are not here to brand Afghanistan as some terror regime since source itself is calling it Afghanistan. Isn't it all about Afghanistan & and the correct thread title to attract & give a comprehensive idea about the subject to be discussed? Indeed it it.

Had it been by member with his own analysis & findings; the title may have been suited but still, it will never result in a good search for quality discussion. Terror Regime? First thing comes to mind is India in Kashmir. How's that gonna work with you then? See, don't just leave it for an individual to decide. You asked me, I shared opinion and criticized the so-called police itself. Regimes are branded by big guns for their interests.

Here, on the Forum, it is just internet with anonymous IDs. You are nothing in this sea to call out anyone as such, brand them and then insist upon the other. Charitable? I bet if India itself can brand them at all. We have no love for anyone neither we are some sort of promoting bodies nor we do allow the contradictory titles.

That's it. Hope it gets through your brain.

Regards,
 
.
Whatever is happening in Afghanistan is just because of american tools that are being played very smartly to brainwash against each other.

The only solution: Taliban should focus only on Afghanistan prosperity and respect the border of neighboring countries, then USA can't do the shit again.

Recent events indicates that there are hidden agenda to make a Chaos among afghani Tajiks, uzbiks and pashtuns.
So that USA can easily get military bases either in Tajikistan or in Uzbekistan. There agenda is to divide Tajik, uzbek and pushtun within Taliban first and then from out side make an excuse to attack the country.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom