zebra7
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 2,135
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Thirdly, most of Shaheen based missiles are conventional to deter unavailability of Strike aircraft in PAF. India doesnt have more than 40 warheads in possession. And Pakistan dont have more than 10, and that too are in Chinese control. All the spent fuel from Pakistani reactor go in China, which hold a unsafegaurd reprocessing plant with capacity of 50 heavymetal-ton/ year. That means for Pakistan, China producing around 2-5 kg of Pu/yr.
I know what are you talking about, but that will not hold any value in PDF. Hundereds of Nukes in Possession is the Stupidity, and your figures should be very close to the reality, but this will bring an earthquake in the PDF, so better let everything going as it is.
But question is, very important question, sometimes in 2009,, SFC and CCS decided to weaponize TNW that tested in Pokharan-2. And thats why DRDO was authorized to develop Shaurya and Prahaar, but in 2013 during SFC scrapped plans to deploy TNW. And thats why Shaurya and Prahaar also cancelled. But Why? If Pak deploying TNW. then isnt we should also deploy TNW.
That was because, the International community aka U.S, Europe NATO takes Indian Govt. in confidence, that they will not allow that condition, and the those missile will only lower down the Nuclear Threshold, and kill the Core Importance of the NUKE which is Deterrence, thus both Shaurya and Prahaar would remain the Tech. Demonstrator, and will not enter the active Service. During Kargil War, some General wants to ignite the cracker, when the calculation of Unit level Operation on the heights turns out to be the massive retaliation response, and PRC was Pissed off, and to explain it the same officer have to go to the Beijing.
Or SFC know something that it doesnt want to share
with General public.
Multi National Operation -- US and NATO needs Bahana like it needed for the Iraq and Afghanistan.
Question is only WHEN ???