What's new

US will pursue Pakistan-based militants: Panetta

Roybot

BANNED
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
20,064
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
Australia
panetta.jpg


ABOARD A US MILITARY AIRCRAFT: US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta expressed frustration with Pakistan’s government on Wednesday, warning that the US will not allow the attacks on US forces from Pakistan-based insurgents like the Haqqani network to continue.

Pointing to the 20-hour assault against the US Embassy and Nato headquarters in Kabul, Afghanistan, that finally ended Wednesday, Panetta said it is unacceptable that the Haqqanis are able to launch such deadly attacks and then flee to safety across the border in Pakistan.

”The message they need to know is: we’re going to do everything we can to defend our forces,” Panetta told reporters travelling with him to San Francisco, California, for meetings with Australian officials.

He refused to say whether the US plans to take any new military actions, but there has been an escalating US campaign of drone strikes into Pakistan’s border regions. The Haqqanis are a lethal terror group allegedly based in Pakistan’s border area.

”Time and again we’ve urged the Pakistanis to exercise their influence over these kinds of attacks from the Haqqanis, and we have made very little progress in that area,” Panetta said. ”I’m not going to talk about how we’re going to respond. … We’re not going to allow these types of attacks to go on.”

US officials have blamed the Haqqani network for the nearly daylong assault on the heavily guarded Afghan capital. The attack left 27 dead, including police, civilians and attackers, officials said.

Panetta’s remarks reflect growing US impatience over Islamabad’s perceived reluctance to go after the Haqqanis, who are connected to both the Taliban and al-Qaeda and present the most significant threat to Afghanistan’s stability.

US officials have repeatedly pressed the Pakistanis to move against insurgent havens in the border region, including in North Waziristan. The Haqqanis allegedly use the territory to launch attacks against US and Afghan forces across the border.

US relations with Pakistan have been rocky amid complaints about the increased American drone attacks across the border. But they worsened after the US special operations forces crossed into Pakistan in May to raid the Abbottabad compound where al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden had been hiding for years. Bin Laden was killed in the raid, and Pakistani officials were angry about what they considered an assault on their country’s sovereignty.

No Nato or US Embassy employees were hurt in the Kabul attack that ended around dawn Wednesday. Eleven Afghan civilians were killed, more than half of them children, said US Marine Corps Gen. John Allen, the top US commander in Afghanistan. Five Afghan police officers were also killed, along with 11 insurgents.

Asked whether the attack raised concerns about the Afghans’ ability to take over their own security, Panetta said that overall their response was good. He repeated US assertions that the violence levels in Afghanistan continue to decline, and the Taliban has been weakened.

”These kinds of sporadic attacks and assassination attempts are more a reflection of the fact that they are losing their ability to be able to attack our forces on a broader scale,” Panetta said.

In other remarks to reporters, the defence chief said that negotiations are progressing well with the Iraqis over a continued US presence in that country after the end of the year. He said there still were no decisions on the number of US troops that may stay, but the talks are centring on what kind of training and counterterrorism assistance the Iraqis will need.

US will pursue Pakistan-based militants: Panetta | Pakistan | DAWN.COM
 
.
In my point of view time has come when we should finally put our concerns and our impatience over NATO/US reluctance to fight against groups and camps established against Pakistan.
 
.
In my point of view time has come when we should finally put our concerns and our impatience over NATO/US reluctance to fight against groups and camps established against Pakistan.

NATO/US should also go after groups and camps established in Pakistan against India and Afghanistan :cheers:
 
.
”The message they need to know is: we’re going to do everything we can to defend our forces,” Panetta told reporters travelling with him to San Francisco, California, for meetings with Australian officials.

This statement should enough lesson for Afghanistan how they are sincere to protect them.

US officials have repeatedly pressed the Pakistanis to move against insurgent havens in the border region, including in North Waziristan. The Haqqanis allegedly use the territory to launch attacks against US and Afghan forces across the border.

Bring Kunar, Nurutan on table.
 
.
NATO/US should also go after groups and camps established in Pakistan against India and Afghanistan :cheers:

Don't go off topic and it is our concern over established terrorists camps near Tajik border & Paktia by India in Afghanistan.
US has to think over it before roaring.
 
. . .
Well, first of all, he should be concerned that how the heck militants, as they say came from NW all the way to the Kabul diplomatic zone, without being noticed, this should be more of a concern for them rather than opening a new theater in this financial crunch.
 
.
All the best to USA :usflag:
I can only laugh on peneta , How they are talking after a terrible defeat in afghanistan, South is already under taliban control . CAN THEY DO ANYTHING ? ? If they can remove safe heavens of taliban in afghanistan , yes they can remove haqqani network .
 
.
Don't go off topic and it is our concern over established terrorists camps near Tajik border & Paktia by India in Afghanistan.
US has to think over it before roaring.

Plz can u provide proof of that..or are u still waiting for appropriate time??
 
.
Obama's strategic failures are setting in, threat in desperation only shows weak side. Hope Pakistan reading geo political map prudently and trend wisely.
 
. .
Well, first of all, he should be concerned that how the heck militants, as they say came from NW all the way to the Kabul diplomatic zone, without being noticed, this should be more of a concern for them rather than opening a new theater in this financial crunch.

Err.. the militants reach kabul just like they reach lahore, karachi, peshawar etc etc...
 
.
Well, first of all, he should be concerned that how the heck militants, as they say came from NW all the way to the Kabul diplomatic zone, without being noticed, this should be more of a concern for them rather than opening a new theater in this financial crunch.

Exactly, cause of security laps shouldn't justify by putting all blame on Pakistan. They need to rectify border security if they supposed that NW groups are involved otherwise current checking measures by Kabul authorities are infected and any anti-US/NATO group from Afghanistan can penetrate to their targets.
 
.
After having read quite a lot about pakistan and americans incursions in to pakistani territory including the Osama raid. I believe that our leadership, including Kayani no matter what they say to the public is completly complicit with the americans. There is nothing that the americans do in pakistan without the president, primeminister and Kayani etc knowing what is going to happen. The craxx we read that america acts unilaterally is rubbish. Our leaders dont want to admit that they are in bed to the extent they are as the public is very anti american. They would rather look impotent and incompetent than admit they are complicit with amreeka
 
.
Back
Top Bottom