What's new

US will miss Afghanistan withdrawal deadline

I am not speaking at the behest of anyone.

Sure.

But we agree that Pashtuns do NOT have a currency nor a nation. To say otherwise is spread a falsehood.

Exactly. So we agree that your below statements are false and, in fact, make no sense whatsoever?

"Pashtuns claim much of Pakistan"

"Powerful ethnic groups also don't like being ruled by different ethnic groups."

"Arming Pakistan means strengthening the entity that occupies Pashtun lands and cities."

"Chinese have in effect declared themselves enemies of the Pashtuns."

 
.
Sure.



Exactly. So we agree that your below statements are false and, in fact, make no sense whatsoever?

"Pashtuns claim much of Pakistan"

"Powerful ethnic groups also don't like being ruled by different ethnic groups."

"Arming Pakistan means strengthening the entity that occupies Pashtun lands and cities."

"Chinese have in effect declared themselves enemies of the Pashtuns."


"CLAIM" CLAIM! I never called it a nation. I called it lands.
 
.
"CLAIM" CLAIM! I never called it a nation. I called it lands.

I'll spell it out. Your entire post was based on the assertion that the claim across the Durand line is Ethnic in nature by the Pashtun ethnicity against the occupation of their historic ethnic lands by another ethnicity while clearly implying that Afghanistan is the spokesman and representative of Pashtuns.

The fact, on the other hand, is that the claim across the Durand line is by a country, i.e. Afghanistan, based on nonsensical historic ethnic claims to the lands. Nonsensical because the ethnicity through which Afghanistan claims those lands is in fact the one who lives on those lands today and owns it. The same ethnicity which has 42 million of its people calling themselves Pakistani than the 15 million calling themselves Afghani. So if the ethnic claims on that land are what legitimize its ownership then Afghanistan and its claims can fly right off. A) Because the Pashtuns already have it, own it, live on it, B) because Pakistan is 3 times more Pashtun than Afghanistan and C) because the Pashtun ethnicity is 3 times more Pakistani than Afghani.

Now, given the fact that Pakistan has three times stronger claim to everything that is Pashtun than Afghanistan your entire post asserting that Pakistan's ownership of the lands between the Durand Line and Indus is somehow an affront to the Pashtun people is obviously false and makes no sense.

Is it clear enough now?
 
Last edited:
.
u.s. missing the afghan withdrawn deadline will spell own hunting season for the afghan taliban on the american good ol boys. hope biden grows a brain cell or two cuz I don't think the taliban are in any mood to talk anymore.


If I am in Trump shoes, and I watching these pet dogs of American establishment aka Biden and co, screwing up the Afghan peace deal, I would be waiting for any hostile incident involving Taliban and American forces post 1st May, and then go full on against this incumbent administration, get max political mileage out of it.
 
.
I'll spell it out for you. Your entire post was based on the assertion that the claim across the Durand line is Ethnic in nature by the Pashtun ethnicity against the occupation of their historic ethnic lands by another ethnicity while clearly implying that Afghanistan is the spokesman and representative of Pashtuns.

The fact, on the other hand, is that the claim across the Durand line is by a country, i.e. Afghanistan, based on idiotic historic ethnic claims to the lands. Idiotic because the ethnicity through which Afghanistan claims those lands is in fact the one who lives on those lands today and owns it. The same ethnicity which has 42 million of its people calling themselves Pakistani than the 15 million calling themselves Afghani. So if the ethnic claims on that land are what legitimize its ownership then Afghanistan and its claims can fly right off. A) Because the Pashtuns already have it, own it, live on it, B) because Pakistan is 3 times more Pashtun than Afghanistan and C) because the Pashtun ethnicity is 3 times more Pakistani than Afghani.

Now, given the facts that has three times stronger claim to everything that is Pashtun than Afghanistan your entire post asserting that Pakistan's ownership of the lands between the Durand Line and Indus is somehow an affront to the Pashtun people is obviously false and makes no sense.

Is it clear enough now?

yup, got it. all good there.
 
.
If I am in Trump shoes, and I watching these pet dogs of American establishment aka Biden and co, screwing up the Afghan peace deal, I would be waiting for any hostile incident involving Taliban and American forces post 1st May, and then go full on against this incumbent administration, get max political mileage out of it.
pretty sure that's what the republicans are waiting for. dems have humiliated them like never in all of american history with two impeachments and failed election challenges, they are itching for payback.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom