US Welcomes China’s RIMPAC Spying

[Aepsilons]

Do not bark for others, my friend. Let them do the barking for themselves.

If you wanna talk, talk directly to the person you refer to.

I hope indirect talk is not a general Japanese way.

Hello @TaiShang ,

I take your point, but let me respectfully infer that in the quest to find intellectual discourse, we need to posit our educated points without the need to insult or use petty verbiage. As to the personal insult(s) being hurled at me and another colleague of ours @gambit by the member The Truth -- such blatant disregard of persona is awing. You and I have exchanged points before and tho we've had some differences in opinion -- as well as some agreement(s) -- i would say with confidence that ive not been at the receiving end of insult(s) by you. Nor have i initiated personal attack(s) , at least i do honestly try not to as i try to maintain respective decorum. This is why i cherish our discourse and discourse with other educated and respectable individuals.This is why I have called into question some communicative tactics. We can exchange views without having to resort to disparage. Thank you for your kind consideration.



I Remain,
@Nihonjin1051

 

[NarThoD]

Hello @TaiShang ,

I take your point, but let me respectfully infer that in the quest to find intellectual discourse, we need to posit our educated points without the need to insult or use petty verbiage. As to the personal insult(s) being hurled at me and another colleague of ours @gambit by the member The Truth -- such blatant disregard of persona is awing. You and I have exchanged points before and tho we've had some differences in opinion -- as well as some agreement(s) -- i would say with confidence that ive not been at the receiving end of insult(s) by you. Nor have i initiated personal attack(s) , at least i do honestly try not to as i try to maintain respective decorum. This is why I have called into question some communicative tactics. We can exchange views without having to resort to disparage. Thank you for your kind consideration.

thank god we have a mediator here. faith in humanity restored

 

[Aepsilons]

thank god we have a mediator here. faith in humanity restored

Salamat Dateng (forgive me for my poor mastery in Bahasa Indonesiah)

Terima Kaseh! ^^

 

[NarThoD]

these PLA navy must be very happy if they can join rimpac and show their capabilities to the world too bad their officials forbid it (lol)
next time plz join coz those Liaoning-class are cool actually

 

[TaiShang]

Hello @TaiShang ,

I take your point, but let me respectfully infer that in the quest to find intellectual discourse, we need to posit our educated points without the need to insult or use petty verbiage. As to the personal insult(s) being hurled at me and another colleague of ours @gambit by the member The Truth -- such blatant disregard of persona is awing. You and I have exchanged points before and tho we've had some differences in opinion -- as well as some agreement(s) -- i would say with confidence that ive not been at the receiving end of insult(s) by you. Nor have i initiated personal attack(s) , at least i do honestly try not to as i try to maintain respective decorum. This is why i cherish our discourse and discourse with other educated and respectable individuals.This is why I have called into question some communicative tactics. We can exchange views without having to resort to disparage. Thank you for your kind consideration.



I Remain,
@Nihonjin1051

Hi @Nihonjin1051 ,

Your points are well taken.

I am always for constructive dialogue which includes disagreements with which I am fine.

One thing I can't stand is to take the conversation down to personal level. Hence the reason for the
above post.

In that particular post, I thought the reference had been made to me and I was saddened by that
since I always find your points professionally-constructed and non-personal. If that post was directed
at another member, then, surely, it is not me to comment on it. In that case, I apologize for the
misunderstanding.

I am an advocate of China-Japan partnership at all levels and there is no obstacle to sustain it here on this
forum, as well.

Stay well,

台上。

 

[Aepsilons]

Hi @Nihonjin1051 ,

Your points are well taken.

I am always for constructive dialogue which includes disagreements with which I am fine.

One thing I can't stand is to take the conversation down to personal level. Hence the reason for the
above post.

In that particular post, I thought the reference had been made to me and I was saddened by that
since I always find your points professionally-constructed and non-personal. If that post was directed
at another member, then, surely, it is not me to comment on it. In that case, I apologize for the
misunderstanding.

I am an advocate of China-Japan partnership at all levels and there is no obstacle to sustain it here on this
forum, as well.

Stay well,

台上。

Hi @TaiShang

I've valued your intellectual input since my first week in PDF, and I remain this positive outlook and view on your points. I may disagree with some , but , I cherish and value your contribution. I am also glad that it has been clarified that I was not referring to you in my previous post(s).

I am elated that we solved this misunderstanding and stand with you in China - Japan partnership. We have to remain positive and find common ground.

You have my kind regards and felicitations,

I remain sincerely yours,
@Nihonjin1051