What's new

US warns China not to attempt Crimea-style action in Asia

Without the trade surplus that china earns from exporting to american, china's economy will collapse. Just in 2013 alone, China earned $318 billion usd from trade surplus with the U.S; that's an equivalent of 1/10 of china forex. China will not be able to find other markets to give China annual trade surplus of $318 billion usd; PERIOD. Maybe Bangladesh can replace the U.S and give China $318 billion in annual trade surplus eh?

In the past 20 years, China has earned over $3.3 TRILLION USD in trade surplus from the U.S market. If there is an economic war, China will lose BIG

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013

Count value-added, not revenue.
 
.
Looks like we have our first delusional American friend who hasn't follow our news. For your information, my American friend, we have shift our focus from export-striven to consumption. In fact, it is very easy for us to dominate the export market but we chose to move up the value-chain. As far as I'm concern, we are your creditor here.


Walmart stops buy Chinese stuff and you're FUCKED.
 
.
Walmart stops buy Chinese stuff and we're FUCKED.

Get it right. What are you going to do without them, not wear shoes or shirts, and roll around outside of your scooters? I would laugh watching that.
 
.
Walmart stops buy Chinese stuff and you're FUCKED.

I always laugh when I hear comments like this. While this may have been true a decade or two ago, but even back then, Americans have already become too reliant on cheap Chinese goods. If Walmart stopped buying from China, everything you buy there will be several times more expensive and beyond the means of the average American to afford a shopping cart they once took for granted. Fast forward to today, China has the cash reserves, the transport, manufacturing and technological infrastructure to become self-sufficient and that is their ultimate goal.

You have to remember that East Asian nations like Japan, China and Korea were all self-sufficient and prosperous prior to interference from Westerners. It was Westerners who forced East Asian countries to open up their markets, to the West, by gunboat diplomacy. East Asian nations have always been more productive and industrious and well capable of being self-sustaining and China will seek to become this once again. The only difference this time is that they will never let their guard down again and forsake their military, as they know the World is full of vultures, waiting to pick you off, if you become weak again.

China is already making preparations to sever what was always going to be a temporary relationship of convenience with the US. If Americans want to delude themselves that cheap Chinese goods will continue to flow in for them because their inflated Dollar is so precious, then let them. I would love to see their faces when the penny drops that everything in Walmart is so expensive and shelves are not so well stocked...that day is not too far in the future.
 
.
Walmart stops buy Chinese stuff and you're FUCKED.

Idiot. LMAO.

Each Walmart purchases as much merchandise from local suppliers as possible, to reduce cost of goods sold and logistics cost. In the United States, most of the goods of Walmart are made in the US. Even in China, Walmart has to devote themselves to develop closer relations with Chinese local retailers and suppliers, otherwise, Walmart will get stomped by Chinese supermarkets or Carrefour. If they stop buying Chinese goods, they are FUCKed! Don't be arrogant.
 
Last edited:
.
Sooner or later Taiwan will implode internally. That is when China will make its move and make a humanitarian takeover of the island. :victory: The Taiwanese military will offer no resistance and there will be no casualty. No US military unit will be allowed to get near Taiwan during the takeover process.

How? Care to explain.
The chances of china imploding internally is more than taiwan as i see it.
 
.
How? Care to explain.
The chances of china imploding internally is more than taiwan as i see it.

Wrong

in the last presidential election
KMT got 52%
DPP 42%
rest: 3%

Republic of China presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

whoever is voted to presidency in the next election, there is going to be constant turmoils in Taiwan

Only india will have greater chances of imploding than Taiwan as it is undergoing a close contention between congress and bjp

If modi can be elected, the tension between hindus and the rest of the religious goups will rise to the boiling point on top of its massive insurgency and social crisis
 
Last edited:
.
Wrong

in the last presidential election
KMT got 52%
DPP 42%
rest: 3%

Republic of China presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

whoever is voted to presidency in the next election, there is going to be constant turmoils in Taiwan

Only india will have greater chances of imploding than Taiwan as it is undergoing a close contention between congress and bjp

If modi can be elected, the tension between hindus and the rest of the religious goups will rise to the boiling point on top of its massive insurgency and social crisis
Spoke like one who has no idea of electoral politics.
 
. . .
Walmart stops buy Chinese stuff and you're FUCKED.

be realistic, it takes years for walmart to do that (in meanwhile budget deficit grows). and even if the walmart does that it will affect pockets of a typical us consumer.
i dont understand this, isnt it more profitable for usa to invest in mexico rather than china? it would have solved the immigration problem as well as many other issues.
 
.
the yankies have warned "red line" on Syria
the yankies have warned "sanctions" and Russia on Crimea
the yankies have warned China about ADIZ
the yankies have warned China over claim of territoral sovereighty
what have happened to these warnings?


Spoke like one who has no idea of electoral politics.

one like indians'
forget it!
 
Last edited:
.
the yankies have warned "red line" on Syria
the yankies have warned "sanctions" and Russia on Crimea
the yankies have warned China about ADIZ
the yankies have warned China over claim of territoral sovereighty
what have happened to these warnings?




one like indian's
forget it!
What ever,keeps your ego high.
 
.
the yankies have warned "red line" on Syria
the yankies have warned "sanctions" and Russia on Crimea
the yankies have warned China about ADIZ
the yankies have warned China over claim of territoral sovereighty
what have happened to these warnings?




one like indian's
forget it!

Warnings to Russia was overpass ... but to China ... it's totally difference as China's totally difference from Russia.
They seems to be more shy and talk more do less.

I'm at Japanese side
 
.
warn China???

it think China is some small nobody???

WASHINGTON: China should not doubt the US commitment to defend its Asian allies and the prospect of economic retaliation should also discourage Beijing from using force to pursue territorial claims in Asia in the way Russia has in Crimea, a senior US official said on Thursday.

Daniel Russel, President Barack Obama's diplomatic point man for East Asia, said it was difficult to determine what China's intentions might be, but Russia's annexation of Crimea had heightened concerns among US allies in the region about the possibility of China using force to pursue its claims.

"The net effect is to put more pressure on China to demonstrate that it remains committed to the peaceful resolution of the problems," Russel, the US assistant secretary of state for East Asia, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Russel said the retaliatory sanctions imposed on Russia by the United States, the European Union and others should have a "chilling effect on anyone in China who might contemplate the Crimea annexation as a model."

This was especially so given the extent of China's economic interdependence with the United States and its Asia neighbors, Russel said.

Russel said that while the United States did not take a position on rival territorial claims in East Asia, China should be in no doubt about Washington's resolve to defend its allies if necessary.

"The president of the United States and the Obama administration is firmly committed to honoring our defense commitments to our allies," he said.

While Washington stood by its commitments - which include defense treaties with Japan, the Philippines and South Korea - Russel said there was no reason why the rival territorial claims could not be resolved by peaceful means.

He said he hoped the fact that the Philippines had filed a case against China on Sunday at an arbitration tribunal in The Hague would encourage China to clarify and remove the ambiguity surrounding its own claims.

Russel termed the deployment of large numbers of Chinese vessels in its dispute with the Philippines in the South China Sea "problematic" and said that Beijing had taken "what to us appears to be intimidating steps."

"It is incumbent of all of the claimants to foreswear intimidation, coercion and other non-diplomatic or extra-legal means," he said.

In Asia, China also has competing territorial claims with Japan and South Korea, as well as with Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan in potentially energy-rich waters.

Obama is due to visit Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and the Philippines from April 22, when he is expected to stress his commitment to a rebalancing of US strategic and economic focus towards the Asia-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China.

no wonder vn consists of bunchs of ignorant idiots.

well, maybe japs should burn and rape vn another time so that you can remember.

anyway, uncle sam burned and raped vn for quite a few years, you remembered nothing.

france did the same burning and raping, well, vn remembered nothing at all.

No wonder vn remembered nothing from the japs.

Warnings to Russia was overpass ... but to China ... it's totally difference as China's totally difference from Russia.
They seems to be more shy and talk more do less.

I'm at Japanese side
 
.
Back
Top Bottom