What's new

US wants 'more active' India in Afghanistan

arp2041

BANNED
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
10,406
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will encourage India to play a ‘more active role’ in Afghanistan during a visit to New Delhi, US officials said on Tuesday.

Washington has previously worried about India antagonising its arch-foe Pakistan and preferred New Delhi retain a modest profile in the Afghan conflict restricted to troop training and infrastructure development.

But officials briefing reporters before Panetta landed in New Delhi on Tuesday said US policy has evolved as the NATO-led force prepares to withdraw combat troops by the end of 2014.

"Over the last 10 years, for a variety of reasons, India has not played a particularly active role in Afghanistan," a senior defence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told reporters aboard Panetta's plane.

"We welcome India playing a more active role in Afghanistan, a more active political and economic role," the official said.

Panetta was due to discuss the issue, as well as a new US strategic tilt towards Asia, when he meets Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon on Tuesday afternoon, before giving a policy speech on Wednesday, officials said.

The United States hoped India would expand its training of Afghan security forces, the defence official said.

India has "trained army and police before but on a relatively small scale", the official said. "We welcome India playing a more active role."

In October, India and Afghanistan signed a ‘strategic partnership’ deal aiming at deepening their security and economic links, with Afghan President Hamid Karzai also keen to elevate India's role.

New Delhi, fearful of the return of an Islamist regime in Kabul, has ploughed about $2.0 billion of aid into the country to gain influence, but is extremely wary of over-stepping.

The US official acknowledged the hostility and distrust between India and Pakistan, but said both countries had a common interest in seeing peace take root in Afghanistan.

"Of course there is a risk that the tensions and historical mistrust between India and Pakistan could lead them to view their respective roles in Afghanistan as being in conflict," he said.

"This is not predestined. This does not have to be the case."

Shashank Joshi, an expert on South Asia security and an associate fellow at the London-based think-tank Royal United Services Institute, said the Indians are afraid of what will happen once NATO combat troops pull of Afghanistan in 2014.

"They are convinced the Afghan state is more brittle than the Americans and the British think and fear they will end up picking up the pieces with the jihadis heading east and their interests in danger," he said.

India's ambassador to Washington last week called for greater coordination with the United States on Afghanistan in a sign of New Delhi's unease about the future.

The suggestion India bolster its presence in Afghanistan might be an attempt by Washington to press Pakistan to open its border to NATO supply convoys, which Islamabad has blocked since a US air strike in November that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

The United States has been pushing Pakistan to reopen the vital supply routes and has had to rely on a more costly, cumbersome route to the north through Central Asia.

Any enhanced role for India would alarm Islamabad, which views New Delhi's activities in Afghanistan with deep suspicion, fearing India could effectively encircle Pakistan through its proxies.

Analysts say Pakistan's intelligence service cultivates links with insurgent groups in Afghanistan as a hedge to counter India's influence.

The US official said Washington expected regional countries, including India and Pakistan, to step up their role in Afghanistan as NATO withdraws over the next two years.

Apart from the war in Afghanistan, Panetta's talks with Indian leaders are expected to touch on America's much-publicised ‘rebalance’ towards Asia, expanding defence ties with India, officials said.

In President Barack Obama's new strategy blueprint unveiled in January, India is the only country mentioned by name as a vital partner.

US officials say the two countries share democratic traditions and similar concerns about China's stance as well as the threat posed by Islamic extremists in South Asia.

But both countries have been disappointed about a lack of progress on defence trade and other fronts.

US wants 'more active' India in Afghanistan | Deccan Chronicle
 
. . . . .
Can't wait ....India needs to send troops to Afghanistan as soon as possible. This is the right moment for India to prove that she has what it takes to labeled as a Superpower ! Go India Go !

we dont need to send troops at all....we just need to say that we are going to train all the afghan forces..

that will be enough for Pakistan to hyperventilate!!
 
.
no thanks...........................
we are happy with developmental role of enhancing the military and economy of Afghanistan
 
.
I think India needs to take a leading role in Afghanistan, the Afghan people love India and the soft power and cultural link with the Afghans will indeed bring stability to that nation.

Everything I have heard and read says that the Afghans would like Indian troops on the ground over there, I know India is already spending $2 billion in infra project and education in Afghanistan, and it has earnt a lot of credits with the Afghan people, India is the best equipped to reach out and stabilize the Afghan nation, I hope India jumps at this chance.
 
. .
The Americans are so transparent. They have lost in Afghanistan and are now attempting to "off load" their dirty washing onto India. They are "bigging up" India and giving them the pat on the back - so as to palm off some of the responsibility of the future of their mess and to obviously irritate Pakistan. I have to chuckle at their mindset - they really think the world is as thick as 2 planks and we cant see what their intention is.
Indians can try to be global warriors on here as much as they want - the reality of it India does not have a border with Afghanistan and they are certainly not naive enough to allow themselves to be "used as a pawn". Where the USA and Russia have walked away - why would India want to carry the baton?
 
. .
The ISI will be looking for India sending out troops to Pakistan, as the momemnt she does so, they can easily let Taliban terrorise India, which they have been doing for a long time. It would give ISI a great advantage...

So from both ways, a BIG no.
 
.
The Americans are so transparent. They have lost in Afghanistan and are now attempting to "off load" their dirty washing onto India. They are "bigging up" India and giving them the pat on the back - so as to palm off some of the responsibility of the future of their mess and to obviously irritate Pakistan. I have to chuckle at their mindset - they really think the world is as thick as 2 planks and we cant see what their intention is.
Indians can try to be global warriors on here as much as they want - the reality of it India does not have a border with Afghanistan and they are certainly not naive enough to allow themselves to be "used as a pawn". Where the USA and Russia have walked away - why would India want to carry the baton?

after dacades of crazziness finally due to india aids and road and electricity developments in afghan there has come a time when afghan can be a prosperous economy. india will now miss out this chance as afghanhas much to offer. use ur brain.

stop bringing pakistan to limelight in everything. u guys are not imp that the entire world is making propaganda against u and planning to disintegerate pakistan. indian presence in afghan is for buisness and some intelligence gathering, there is no relation with pakistan.
 
.
The Americans are so transparent. They have lost in Afghanistan and are now attempting to "off load" their dirty washing onto India. They are "bigging up" India and giving them the pat on the back - so as to palm off some of the responsibility of the future of their mess and to obviously irritate Pakistan. I have to chuckle at their mindset - they really think the world is as thick as 2 planks and we cant see what their intention is.
Indians can try to be global warriors on here as much as they want - the reality of it India does not have a border with Afghanistan and they are certainly not naive enough to allow themselves to be "used as a pawn". Where the USA and Russia have walked away - why would India want to carry the baton?

hey ram, kitna darte ho? thread title padho. Its about US-India-Afghanistan partnership.

why u feeling insecure? :rofl: :rofl:
 
.
The Americans are so transparent. They have lost in Afghanistan and are now attempting to "off load" their dirty washing onto India. They are "bigging up" India and giving them the pat on the back - so as to palm off some of the responsibility of the future of their mess and to obviously irritate Pakistan. I have to chuckle at their mindset - they really think the world is as thick as 2 planks and we cant see what their intention is.
Indians can try to be global warriors on here as much as they want - the reality of it India does not have a border with Afghanistan and they are certainly not naive enough to allow themselves to be "used as a pawn". Where the USA and Russia have walked away - why would India want to carry the baton?



Are you frustrated and envy coz USA is not giving importance to its Major non-NATO alliance???

@Topic: We have burnt our hand by sending Peacekeeping force in Lanka, We will not make any such Mistake, The armed operation will and must be handled by ANA and NATO. We will send trainers and put money in Infrastructure...

Wait what is this?????


india-plans-build-afghan-iran-rail-link-1324352522.jpg


EVIL Indians.. :devil:

 
.
Back
Top Bottom