What's new

US vows to keep Gulf waterway open despite Iran's threats

T-Rex

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
9,989
Reaction score
-11
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
US vows to keep Gulf waterway open despite Iran's threats
US army spokesman says they will ensure the freedom of navigation, after Tehran hints it might close Strait of Hormuz.
2012789201201734_20.jpg

The Strait of Hormuz is the waterway from the Gulf to the Indian Ocean [Reuters]

The US military has promised once again to keep Gulf waterways open to oil tankers as the Iranian president appeared to renew threats to close off the region.

Captain Bill Urban, a spokesman for the US military's Central Command, told the Associated Press news agency on Wednesday that US sailors and its regional allies "stand ready to ensure the freedom of navigation and the free flow of commerce wherever international law allows".

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday hinted Iran could halt regional exports if it is stopped from exporting oil after the US pulled out of the nuclear deal with world powers.

"The Americans have claimed they want to completely stop Iran's oil exports. They don't understand the meaning of this statement, because it has no meaning for Iranian oil not to be exported, while the region's oil is exported," the website, president.ir, quoted him as saying.

Military praises Rouhani stance
Iranian officials in the past have threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route, in retaliation for any hostile US action against Iran.

Separately, a senior Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander said on Wednesday that they were ready to prevent regional oil exports if Iranian oil sales were banned by the US.




WATCH
25:00
Is Donald Trump on a relentless quest to corner Iran?
Praising Rouhani's remarks, Major-General Qassem Soleimani said he was ready to implement such a policy if needed.

"I kiss your (Rouhani's) hand for expressing such wise and timely comments, and I am at your service to implement any policy that serves the Islamic Republic," Soleimani, commander of Quds force, in charge of foreign operations for the Revolutionary Guards, said in a letter published by state news agency IRNA.

The US pulled out of a multinational deal in May to lift sanctions against Iran in return for curbs to its nuclear programme.

Washington has since told countries that they must halt all imports of Iranian oil from November 4 or face US financial measures, with no exemptions.

Meeting in Vienna
READ MORE
US aims to reduce Iran's oil revenue to zero
The European Union, once Iran's biggest oil importer, have vowed to keep the 2015 deal alive without the US by trying to keep Iran's oil and investment flowing, but have acknowledged that US sanctions would make it difficult to give Tehran guarantees.

President Hassan Rouhani, who is now in Vienna trying to salvage the nuclear deal, said on Wednesday that "If the remaining signatories can guarantee Iran's benefits, Iran will remain in the nuclear deal without the US."

Foreign ministers from China, France, Germany, Britain and Russia will meet Iranian officials on Friday in Vienna to discuss how to keep a 2015 nuclear accord alive.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/07/vows-gulf-waterway-open-iran-threats-180704144659041.html
 
Yes this water ways will be the first victim in war. lol
 
Islamic Republic of Iran threatened to "close off the region" once before, We all know how that went.
 
Iran closing the Hormuz !!!! :lol::lol:

what next threatens to sink a carrier again :rofl:
 
Iran can easily shut the narrow passage that is not the difficult part. The big question is what will follow? Can Iran defend herself from the US onslaught that will surely follow? Will China and Russia come forward to assist Iran?
 

That's why the mullahs & Co will either build nukes or will get dispatched to dustbin of history. Mullahs/regime survival now depends on nukes, no sane country would dare military operation against nuclear armed country with several hundred thousands ballistic missiles. Plus having nukes will give mullahs an additional leverage in any negotiation if that ever where to happen.

P.S everybody and their grandma are talking about "mines" but really Iran needs to sink 2 of those VLCC tankers, 1 in each traffic lane and the shipping will come to grinding halt plus insurance premium will go thru roof and oil will be hovering between 150-200 per barrel. Remember strait of Hormuz at its narrowest section is only 31 miles wide BUT only 18 miles of it is deep enough for tanker traffic.
 
That's why the mullahs & Co will either build nukes or will get dispatched to dustbin of history. Mullahs/regime survival now depends on nukes, no sane country would dare military operation against nuclear armed country with several hundred thousands ballistic missiles. Plus having nukes will give mullahs an additional leverage in any negotiation if that ever where to happen.

P.S everybody and their grandma are talking about "mines" but really Iran needs to sink 2 of those VLCC tankers, 1 in each traffic lane and the shipping will come to grinding halt plus insurance premium will go thru roof and oil will be hovering between 150-200 per barrel. Remember strait of Hormuz at its narrowest section is only 31 miles wide BUT only 18 miles of it is deep enough for tanker traffic.

Iran was duped into this pact which was going to be ditched anyway. It was a failure of the mullahs to foresee such a scenario. I don't think Iran has the time to develop fully functional nukes before the assault begins. Iran is in a trap because her allies had made the Mullahs trust the words of Iran's enemies. So indirectly Putin is also responsible for Iran's predicament at the moment.
 
trump will see it is not blocked by anybody .
Are you another Indian that worships Trump?

Iran can easily shut the narrow passage that is not the difficult part. The big question is what will follow? Can Iran defend herself from the US onslaught that will surely follow? Will China and Russia come forward to assist Iran?
Russia and China will not come to Iran aid.
Iran doenst have the airforce necessary to fight the American and middle eastern airforces. Industrial naval battles if any will be air battles or air to ship.
Long term Iran will lose but it may Take many with it.
 
Are you another Indian that worships Trump?


Russia and China will not come to Iran aid.
Iran doenst have the airforce necessary to fight the American and middle eastern airforces. Industrial naval battles if any will be air battles or air to ship.
Long term Iran will lose but it may Take many with it.

Definitely Russia will not come forward to assist but I'm not sure that China can afford to stay inactive. In any case if a conflict becomes unavoidable Iran should take down the wahabi whoredoms with it.
 
That's why the mullahs & Co will either build nukes or will get dispatched to dustbin of history. Mullahs/regime survival now depends on nukes, no sane country would dare military operation against nuclear armed country with several hundred thousands ballistic missiles. Plus having nukes will give mullahs an additional leverage in any negotiation if that ever where to happen.

P.S everybody and their grandma are talking about "mines" but really Iran needs to sink 2 of those VLCC tankers, 1 in each traffic lane and the shipping will come to grinding halt plus insurance premium will go thru roof and oil will be hovering between 150-200 per barrel. Remember strait of Hormuz at its narrowest section is only 31 miles wide BUT only 18 miles of it is deep enough for tanker traffic.

nukes did not stop US doing operations in pakistan , salala and abbottabad , drone strikes etc . nukes are deterent for neighbours ,not for super power 20000 km away .

Iran closing the Hormuz !!!! :lol::lol:

what next threatens to sink a carrier again :rofl:

attack on israel .
 
nukes did not stop US doing operations in pakistan , salala and abbottabad , drone strikes etc . nukes are deterent for neighbours ,not for super power 20000 km away .

You're too dense to have any logic to argue with, can't patch an idiot as the saying goes. If what you're saying is right then why Trump wanted a meeting with Kim so bad if he wasn't afraid of nuclear war? plus half dozen nukes will have global fallout due to wind stream, but again one with no logic can't comprehend the consequences.
 
You're too dense to have any logic to argue with, can't patch an idiot as the saying goes. If what you're saying is right then why Trump wanted a meeting with Kim so bad if he wasn't afraid of nuclear war? plus half dozen nukes will have global fallout due to wind stream, but again one with no logic can't comprehend the consequences.

we are talking about pakistan armed with nukes .nukes did not stop US operating inside pakistan violating all international norms .
by the way kim begged for meeting .
 
Back
Top Bottom