Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep! Clinton offered the F-35 to India for $60 million, but:the lockheed says that f-35 will cost 70 million without engines to US airforce.
New Recruit
JayAlt:
[If] India buying F35 then its can joint fight with NATO and also more chances for India to get alternative plans when something get rumors. Like I said, F35 is pricey but its built for the "option".
[If] India buy T50 then India enemies still be able to get T50 due to its way cheaper than F35 and something realy happend India can not joint fight with NATO if its need to get backup from the alternative route.
New Recruit
Dude........now i am really Piised off with that*********F-35********STUFFFFFFFF
JayAlt:
[If] India buying F35 then its can joint fight with NATO and also more chances for India to get alternative plans when something get rumors. Like I said, F35 is pricey but its built for the "option".
[If] India buy T50 then India enemies still be able to get T50 due to its way cheaper than F35 and something realy happend India can not joint fight with NATO if its need to get backup from the alternative route.
New Recruit
r u really Out of ur mind
India is partner in PAK FA project.......without indian permision russians even can't sell a single part of Pak fa to any country....
and INDIA ALSO GETS HALF PROFIT FOR EVERY SINGLE SELL OF PAK FA TO NATIONS......
New Recruit
Nato or not. I look at it from the point of view that you got a great airframe and engine but weapons package and EW suit is lacking... you get to be part of " no supply chain issues", best next gen tech added in future (let’s face it BVR and AESA were given years in advance to certain NATO countries before Russian even attempted to make one ( AESA), let alone they don't have one for aircrafts ready still ).
Why deal with an aircraft from Russia which still too much in the infancy stage and does not give you best all around. yeah it is much better in being maneuverable but who is getting into dogfights with Awacs, AESA, BVR ?
maybe too simpistic view.
First apologies for starting a new thread about this and hope you guys would not mind.
- But really the only things I read here is full of country specific" objections honestly vs. Whats best for India- that I had to start a thread based on Pro's vs. cons' ( wish the guys like Sancho can comment about it)
My bone of contention is really Russian quality. Thats what it boils down to. Yes, I know the F35 B aircraft not A, is having some issues. I get that...
My issue is with PAK -FA that makes me favor F35: You know that the weapons package and EW suite is far superior from the west. so unless you get or create a JSF like program that allows you to get those packages integrated into PAK-FA - is the aircraft really top notch?
You know - lord knows, that there are supply chain issues with Russian products, over lifetime; it costs more and just shoddy products from them. Look at your, Indias, purchase of smirch rockets... only what 5 years ago and it has serious issues with Russian quality. and then look at delays from anything from russia.
For me F35 is a no-brainer, allow me to preface it by saying knowing American and European technology will win in the end and given track history, is a superb 5th gen aircraft on hand by 2015 instead of 2020 ( come on have Russians ever delivered anything on time?).
Or perhaps I should ask, what if, hypothetical example Say your enemy was offered this aircraft. would you be A-Okay and rest your laurel on the PAK-FA?
Now, what I like about US offering is to be part of the JSF program. IF and thats a good If india can take advantage of the crisis in Europe and zeal of Americans to be on your good side and extrapolate some additional extras like a TOT on most of it, allow India to produce it in India . I dont get why not drop Pak_FA.
Nato or not. I look at it from the point of view that you got a great airframe and engine but weapons package and EW suit is lacking... you get to be part of " no supply chain issues", best next gen tech added in future (lets face it BVR and AESA were given years in advance to certain NATO countries before Russian even attempted to make one ( AESA), let alone they don't have one for aircrafts ready still ).
Why deal with an aircraft from Russia which still too much in the infancy stage and does not give you best all around. yeah it is much better in being maneuverable but who is getting into dogfights with Awacs, AESA, BVR ?
maybe too simpistic view.
Why don't you think this way: "You can get some F-35 learn new technologies and create for your own product which is you also have in exchange technologies from Russia."
That's what I think but I could be wrong. If I have that option, I will use both best technologies for my own good in the future.