What's new

US Treasury Confirms that Al Qaeda Runs Syrian “Rebellion”

Infoman

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
678
Reaction score
-4
Country
United States
Location
United States
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) in its article, “Al Qaeda’s War for Syria,” cited officials from the US Treasury Department stating, “Al Qaeda in Syria (often operating as the “Al Nusra Front for the People of the Levant”) is using traffickers—some ideologically aligned, some motivated by money—to secure routes through Turkey and Iraq for foreign fighters, most of whom are from the Middle East and North Africa. A growing number of donors from the Persian Gulf and Levant appear to be sending financial support.”

US Treasury Confirms that Al Qaeda Runs Syrian “Rebellion” | Global Research
 
.
The promptness, and shrewdness of Al-Nosrah had dramatically surpassed them over the FSA. It's Assad's fault from the start. There's no smoke without fire.

I still consider them as a Terror group though.
 
.
The biggest terror group in world history has been the Western Civilization. For the Muslims or Eastern world to emulate that we need a new 9/11 every single day for 100 straight years if not 200 years.

Also I do not care who USA regards as "terrorists" and non-terrorists. They control everything anyway and use the word as it pleases them.

If China was not as strong as they are or Russia for that matter they along with NATO/FN would call China and Russia for "terrorist states".

I wonder when they will call the people behind the drone attacks that recently just killed 11 civilian Afghans for terrorists? Or those that operate in Yemen.

Moronic news.

Same source who hails the Zionists and spread lies about Iraq before the 2003 invasion.

I am starting to become more anti-American for each day and more pro-China/Russia. Never thought I would say this.

Anyway they will never touch KSA due to the location of Makkah and Madinah.
 
. .
It's just because of the pressure of public opinion, in the background they will continue their assistance to whoever fights against Syrian government. we all know the only purpose of Al-Qaeda is serving U.S and Israel dirty plans, they stay beside Israel border and don't even throw an stone toward them.
 
.
F$A are nothing but terrorists... they are Alqaeda who operate under the name of F$A to manipulate the world...
Happy Independance birthday Syrian.

You know your self it is not true. You already said that many rebels were not fanatic or linked to foreign nations or al qaida terrorists.
I guess you know that most of the Syrian victims of this war they are people who don't like both sides.

I don't think we can blame USA or Russia or any country for this. My opinion is you can blame two axis for the hell in your country.
You know who they are. One if what you believe your friend and it is true they help Assad .
Your opinion is supporting Assad , you have your own moral and honesty i respect it. Pls just dont enter in this game anti this or that.

Whatever happens your country need at least normalized diplomatic relations and work for its people.

Again happy Independance day Syrian Lion.
 
.
Many Free Syria Army defended al Nusra from the West tho. Does that means after the post Assad the US will invade Syria and eliminate 50% of the Free Syrian Army, Islamist fronts, all al Nusra and Syrian civilians along with them? The more story I hear about "terrorism", the more I hate America. Enough of this heavy foreign involvement in Syria! The people are suffering from rape, torture and murders and yet you call al Nusra terrorist? How are they terrorist when they are against the regime and Assad is still being called "President" by the media yet still slaughtering over 100,000+ Syrians or even more when America invades Syria. F**K MURICA!
 
.
The biggest terror group in world history has been the Western Civilization. For the Muslims or Eastern world to emulate that we need a new 9/11 every single day for 100 straight years if not 200 years.

Also I do not care who USA regards as "terrorists" and non-terrorists. They control everything anyway and use the word as it pleases them.

If China was not as strong as they are or Russia for that matter they along with NATO/FN would call China and Russia for "terrorist states".

I wonder when they will call the people behind the drone attacks that recently just killed 11 civilian Afghans for terrorists? Or those that operate in Yemen.

Moronic news.

Same source who hails the Zionists and spread lies about Iraq before the 2003 invasion.

I am starting to become more anti-American for each day and more pro-China/Russia. Never thought I would say this.

Anyway they will never touch KSA due to the location of Makkah and Madinah.



Highly delusive and fill with hate. No point in responding ...
@Topic: We are saying is since begining. The NATO should support Asad. If there any change in goverment should happen in Syria, it should happen from within, without spilling blood.

Enough of blood have wasted in Syria, now stop this madness and curb terrorists..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
The biggest terror group in world history has been the Western Civilization. For the Muslims or Eastern world to emulate that we need a new 9/11 every single day for 100 straight years if not 200 years.

Also I do not care who USA regards as "terrorists" and non-terrorists. They control everything anyway and use the word as it pleases them.

If China was not as strong as they are or Russia for that matter they along with NATO/FN would call China and Russia for "terrorist states".

I wonder when they will call the people behind the drone attacks that recently just killed 11 civilian Afghans for terrorists? Or those that operate in Yemen.

Moronic news.

Same source who hails the Zionists and spread lies about Iraq before the 2003 invasion.

I am starting to become more anti-American for each day and more pro-China/Russia. Never thought I would say this.

Anyway they will never touch KSA due to the location of Makkah and Madinah.

And yet this is the exact same US, that is propping up the puppet monarchies in the GCC?
 
.
And yet this is the exact same US, that is propping up the puppet monarchies in the GCC?

Which puppet monarchies are you talking about? The Al-Saud established themselves in 1744 - way before any foreign involvement. KSA was never colonized and the borders of today were not made by any outsiders. In fact the British and their allies had to stop the Al-Saud from conquering even bigger areas of the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East.

Secondly USA do not interfere in Saudi politics nor are they able to do that. The relationship is solely an economic/military one which is beneficial for all parties.

What I am against is the hypocrisy. Why is nobody calling those who killed 11 civilian Afghans (many children) with drones a few days ago for terrorists?

My point is that the label "terrorist" can be used by anybody and it is not to be taken serious.
 
.
Many Free Syria Army defended al Nusra from the West tho. Does that means after the post Assad the US will invade Syria and eliminate 50% of the Free Syrian Army, Islamist fronts, all al Nusra and Syrian civilians along with them? The more story I hear about "terrorism", the more I hate America. Enough of this heavy foreign involvement in Syria! The people are suffering from rape, torture and murders and yet you call al Nusra terrorist? How are they terrorist when they are against the regime and Assad is still being called "President" by the media yet still slaughtering over 100,000+ Syrians or even more when America invades Syria. F**K MURICA!


Stop America Bashing and Islam praising.. Those fighting in Syria are Muslims only
 
.
The way I see it , USA is helping "al-Qaeda" to settle into a country , in this case Syria , so that they drop the status of a nomadic terrorist group
 
.
Which puppet monarchies are you talking about? The Al-Saud established themselves in 1744 - way before any foreign involvement. KSA was never colonized and the borders of today were not made by any outsiders. In fact the British and their allies had to stop the Al-Saud from conquering even bigger areas of the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East.

Secondly USA do not interfere in Saudi politics nor are they able to do that. The relationship is solely an economic/military one which is beneficial for all parties.

What I am against is the hypocrisy. Why is nobody calling those who killed 11 civilian Afghans (many children) with drones a few days ago for terrorists?

My point is that the label "terrorist" can be used by anybody and it is not to be taken serious.

When the Al-Saud dynasty was established and whether or not America interfers in Saudi domestic policies, is not as relevant as the fact that Saudi Arabia is extremely accomodating to American/Western hegemony in their country (economic) and the region as a whole.
 
.
Al Nusra is definitely a front for the Al Qaeda. And their goal for fighting in Syria is to re-establish a sort of pseudo-omayyad caliphate based in Damascus. No wonder the FSA field units have such names. What we're seeing now is the death of civilians who are predominantly Sunni, but if such radical groups come into power, there would be a Shia genocide. Either is unacceptable.

I'm sure syrian people won't accept radical fundamentalists ruling over them. Just like Libya didn't, even though Al qaeda-connected groups fought in Libya against gaddafi. Assad wouldn't have been bad if he hadn't started killing protesters, continuing the legacy of his father, as soon as the population started protesting against his rule.
 
.
Al Nusra is definitely a front for the Al Qaeda. And their goal for fighting in Syria is to re-establish a sort of pseudo-omayyad caliphate based in Damascus. No wonder the FSA field units have such names. What we're seeing now is the death of civilians who are predominantly Sunni, but if such radical groups come into power, there would be a Shia genocide. Either is unacceptable.

I'm sure syrian people won't accept radical fundamentalists ruling over them. Just like Libya didn't, even though Al qaeda-connected groups fought in Libya against gaddafi. Assad wouldn't have been bad if he hadn't started killing protesters, continuing the legacy of his father, as soon as the population started protesting against his rule.

that's what the jews want , the shia and sunni kill each other , and they probably think they are so clever and evil for this to be implemented , the sunnis can always be imported from other nations , not to mention the Palestinian refugees , the FSA will soon start hostilities with israel
 
.
Back
Top Bottom