What's new

US to incentivise Pakistan’s cooperation, says Mattis

what do you mean hathi k moonh walay bhai...i ain't friendly? :cray:
I don't want to derail the thread but your profile is closed where I could have asked the question. The pic in your profile pic is of the time of 1990s, right? The colour effect, the shade gives that impression.
 
.
wow! you guys still believe this crap? The macedonians, the kushans, the mogol/chinese all did just fine traversing through Afghanistan. Before that Afghanistan for centuries served well as the border state for the sub-continent. The Soviets were defeated in Afghanistan but that would have happened anywhere else in the world given the amount technological superiority of the Americans (and severe mis-calculations by the Soviet).

IMO Pakistan should stop designing its policies totally based on Afghanistan, India, China and KSA; instead they should look totally to the needs of Pakistanis.

Who said that we believed it, it was a complement. BTW you dont need to tell us what to do!
 
.
Who said that we believed it, it was a complement. BTW you dont need to tell us what to do!

good for you if you don't but many of your Pakistanis seem to. Such stupidity leads to backwardness and from such backwardness, when they view their neighborhood and see them doing a lot better, it leads to jealousies. Not just India, even BD is doing better and they cannot accept it. And that leads to hatred towards Indians resulting in terrorism.
 
.
Why is there a feeling in Pakistan that allowing foreigners (even friendly ones) to set up military bases is something to be proud of. Is that not an acknowledgement of military insecurity?

Emotional phrases like "Proud of ashamed of" never counts and stand when any country is dealing a strategic policy.

The policies are beyond emotionalism.

It pains my fingers to type it. It also makes me want to spit blood. LOL! I will increase your suspense. I will give you a clue. Pakistan ended up with several hundred millions of dollars worth of soya beans. But that is not what we were supposed to be buying. Come on man, google is your friend. Google it.

:lol: well with facility of jamming in hands of amreeekan, we would be better with soya beans than Fk 16

I don't want to derail the thread but your profile is closed where I could have asked the question. The pic in your profile pic is of the time of 1990s, right? The colour effect, the shade gives that impression.

The picture in his profile might be of that era. It is the pic of Late Junaid Jamshid.
 
.
:lol: well with facility of jamming in hands of amreeekan, we would be better with soya beans than Fk 16

I doubt that story is true, because if it is and if t ever happened in a real war, the Americans would never be able to sell another piece of military hardware ever again to anyone. Imagine if a country lost a war because the Americans jammed a weapons system sold to them? It would be a worldwide outrage and every single country that ever bought US hardware would have to scrap what they bought.
 
.
I doubt that story is true, because if it is and if t ever happened in a real war, the Americans would never be able to sell another piece of military hardware ever again to anyone. Imagine if a country lost a war because the Americans jammed a weapons system sold to them? It would be a worldwide outrage and every single country that ever bought US hardware would have to scrap what they bought.

Well Pakistan has some quiet a talent hence we can try to manage even if some spare parts are denied :) but it is a fact they cripple you by denying important spare parts or even up gradation if you want. Sauds have got a lot of equipment but it is also a fact they are not uncontrolled.
 
.
I don't want to derail the thread but your profile is closed where I could have asked the question. The pic in your profile pic is of the time of 1990s, right? The colour effect, the shade gives that impression.
the guy in my dp is late junaid jamshed. :cry::cry:
-
but what's that got to with me being unfriendly? :(
 
.
hmm i posted the information (first 2 lines) from NDTV now tell me other use of military bases except holding troops uses for rearming refueling (these three task are done when machines(jets,ships etc) are at those bases) drone attacks are done from afghanistan not from pakistan (and this is defferent issue)
and how many other countries sign similar pact afghanistan,iraq and india yeah you are very welcome to this club of yours with war torned countries

Having a base means having property in which any military asset can be parked, stored, etc. for use or standby

The LEMOA is not an agreement for basing rights. It facilitates use of Indian/US bases by vessels of each other for refueling and replenishment. Earlier this might have happened on an ad-hoc basis (say a US vessel needed fueling on way to Singapore from Aden). Now the operating process is documented. It's quite different from having a base.

Sadly the US military does not publish a nice map showing all their bases but these links might be helpful

http://occasionalplanet.org/2015/10/26/case-closing-overseas-military-bases/

https://off-guardian.org/2015/09/20/the-russians-are-coming/

https://qz.com/374138/these-are-all-the-countries-where-the-us-has-a-military-presence/
 
. .
“its better to live like a lion for a day than live like a fox for one hundred years”

even now we cant recognize that we are being misused!
What lion and fox, these are wild animals. In modern world its human resource development, economists and diplomacy backed by reliable war machinery while standing firm on own national interests. Please forget about lion, fox and jackals.
 
.
WASHINGTON: US defence secretary-designate James Mattis has said that the Trump administration would offer incentives to Pakistan to cooperate with the United States on critical issues.

At his confirmation hearing at the Senate Armed Forces Committee on Thursday afternoon, Mr Mattis underlined the need to stay engaged with Pakistan while asking it to do more to eradicate terrorism from the region.

5879453eec527.jpg

US defence secretary-designate James Mattis


“If confirmed, I will work with the State Department and the Congress to incentivise Pakistan’s cooperation on issues critical to our national interests and the region’s security, with focus on Pakistan’s need to expel or neutralise externally-focused militant groups that operate within its borders,” Mr Mattis told the committee while responding to a question.

Mr Mattis, a general who retired from the US Marine Corps in 2013, has long experience of dealing with both Afghanistan and Pakistan, first as a combat officer and then as commander of the US Central Command.

See: Trump pick for defence secy Gen James Mattis ─ a 'Mad Dog' with a big library

He was known in the armed forces as “Mad Dog Mattis” for his aggressive style but was widely respected as a courageous officer.

The general’s comments on Pakistan indicate that the incoming Trump administration will continue with the existing US policy towards the country.

Mr Mattis complemented Pakistan for its action against terror groups in the country, but said that he would push for more effective targeting of groups that were aimed at neighbouring countries.

As often expressed by the Obama administration officials, the incoming defence secretary also complained that some Afghan Taliban groups were still allegedly using Pakistan’s tribal areas for stirring troubles in Afghanistan.

“Sanctuaries and freedom of movement for the Afghan Taliban and associated militant networks inside Pakistani territory is a key operational issue faced by the Afghan security forces,” he pointed out.

Mr Mattis said that if confirmed, he would “examine efforts to deny sanctuary to the extremist forces” undermining the stability and security of Afghanistan.

He noted that the US and Pakistani militaries had a long relationship, which needed to be rebuilt.

“Our relationship with Pakistan, including our military-to-military relationship, has had highs and lows. We have long faced a lack of trust within the Pakistani military and government about our goals in the region. If confirmed, I will work to build the trust that we need for an effective partnership,” he told the Senate Committee. The United States has conducted military exercises with Pakistan in an effort to increase thrust and interoperability, he added.

Mr Mattis said that Pakistan had “learned some hard lessons” from its dealings with the Taliban, as this caused widespread violence inside the country as well. “I believe they should do more to collaborate with their neighbour. We should urge Pakistan to take further actions against the Taliban and the Haqqani network,” he added.

Arguing that countries in the region “have the responsibility to support the reconciliation process” in Afghanistan, Mr Mattis said that the neighbouring states “should increase pressure on the Afghan Taliban and associated militant networks” to stop their campaigns of violence.

He praised Pakistan’s efforts to battle “internally-focused” militants. “In a sign of its commitment, its military has suffered significant casualties in this counterinsurgency effort,” he said, and offered to help Pakistan in defeating these militants.

Mr Mattis said he would not use phrases such as “rebalance” or “pivot” while talking about its relations with China as these implied that it was turning away from its commitments elsewhere.
-
“But China’s behaviour has led countries in the region to look for stronger US leadership. “If confirmed, I will examine ways to strengthen our allies and partners, while taking a careful look at our own military capabilities in the region,” he said.

Mr Mattis pledged to continue with the Obama administration’s policy of enhancing a long-term strategic relationship with India, based on the convergence of mutual interests and shared democratic values.

Published in Dawn January 14th, 2017
He has been confirmed today as Sec. of Def. 92-0 so far.
 
Last edited:
.
pakiostan should by used f16 and have enugh friend ship with us to keep f16 flying in war time for at least 3 month and that is asking for to much
 
.
pakiostan should by used f16 and have enugh friend ship with us to keep f16 flying in war time for at least 3 month and that is asking for to much
:o:
Anyways Pakistan cannot shake off the US yoke anytime soon. Both are interdependent on each other.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom