What's new

‘US to export all NATO cargo out of Pakistan’

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Safety concerns: ‘US to export all NATO cargo out of Pakistan’
By Waqar Satti
Published: December 29, 2011
ISLAMABAD: Barely a month after Pakistan’s retaliatory decision to block Nato supplies for the coalition forces stationed in Afghanistan, the United States has decided to export all its cargo, including military hardware and arms, out of Pakistan.
Sources told Express News that the break in supplies has frustrated US authorities to the point where they are now weighing various options to move around the cargo stranded at various locations in Pakistan.
“It has been a month since the Nato attack which resulted in the port and border closures with no resolution in sight, the US government intends to have all import unit cargo that is currently staged at different Container Holding Yards (CHYs) moved back to Karachi port or the nearest CHY to the port. Once we receive approval, all unit cargo will be exported out of Pakistan,” wrote Anita Rice, Chief of the OCCA SWA (595th Trans Brigade, NSA Bahrain) in an email to all ‘concerned’ persons.
“To ensure smooth transition from import to export cargo in the Pakistan Customs Clearance System (PaCCS) and Pakistan Revenue Automation Limited (PRAL) computer systems, documents are required to be submitted to the US consulate in Karachi,” Anita added in the email.
“We require all USC-6 (universal contract 2006) carriers to submit the required documents to the US consulate, Karachi (karachidodcustoms@state.gov) for cargo/supplies currently staged outside the port for export,” the email read.
According to sources, US cargo, stranded in Pakistan, is worth millions of dollars and US authorities have serious concerns over the safety of the cargo as it includes hammer vehicles, dumpers, anti-aircraft guns, special carriers of anti-aircraft guns, vehicles specially built to jam communications, cranes and sophisticated weapons.
“We will compile information for submission to Pakistan customs for amendment for cargo export,” Rice said in her email, providing US Lieutenant Colonel Jerome Heath’s contact number for further assistance.
Furthermore, it was learnt that the US was using Pakistani routes to supply cargo to its military forces fighting in Afghanistan since 2006 under USC-6 (universal contract 2006). Under this arrangement, US military personnel were engaged in loading and unloading of cargo while no physical checking was being carried out by Pakistani authorities.
When approached by ExpressNews, Rice refused to comment. Heath was also not available to share his version on this report.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 29th, 2011.
 
.
Pakistan should charge them the demurrage, as they did for the detained F-16's.
 
.
Thats gonna be one job now. Which will choke up the ports and jam the roads and logistical system for some more time.
 
.
good take this **** out of pakistan and move on from here we don't need your dirty work anymore
 
. . .
If the US is able to carry on with their activities in Afghanistan without Pakistan's support than this is not good news for Pakistan in the long run.
 
.
they should be charged for the space their luggage used in lasted one month at our ports.

Its good we will have no attacks on oil tanker and there will be less headlines in western newspapers.
 
. .
cost of the transit fee Pakistan charged from the USA..

This is exactly... what i say is unfair...
Bhartis get free rides under the guise of MFN, while other states incl. US deserve much more privileges than bharat.

If I'm the President... before granting Bharat MFN... i'll grant MMFN to USA.
 
.
This is exactly... what i say is unfair...
Bhartis get free rides under the guise of MFN, while other states incl. US deserve much more privileges than bharat.

If I'm the President... before granting Bharat MFN... i'll grant MMFN to USA.

which is fine.. but why the crib about damage to the roads... When Pakistan decided to be the supply route for the USA in Afghanistan, what were they expecting NATO would be using to transport the goods.. Bicycles??
 
.
which is fine.. but why the crib about damage to the roads... When Pakistan decided to be the supply route for the USA in Afghanistan, what were they expecting NATO would be using to transport the goods.. Bicycles??

There is a little problem.... you ignore it is Pakistan and we decide the terms.

Unfair agreements are bound to have complications sooner than later.

You bhartis also don't expect to have the free ride for ever, perhaps next we send the bill to you.
 
.
There is a little problem.... you ignore it is Pakistan and we decide the terms.

Unfair agreements are bound to have complications sooner than later.

You bhartis also don't expect to have the free ride for ever, perhaps next we send the bill to you.

this gentleman thinks we really care, moreover ur good for nothing government doesn't seem to be in a position to do anything...
 
.
this gentleman thinks we really care, moreover ur good for nothing government doesn't seem to be in a position to do anything...

Height of ungratefulness...

You never had so many free rides and subsidies from any past Pakistani govt.
 
.
Height of ungratefulness...

You never had so many free rides and subsidies from any past Pakistani govt.

i don't see how thats ungrateful, pakistan was given MFN way back in 1996, ur MFN is just in reciprocity....

Pakistani vehicles are also allowed free rides in india...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom