US strikes China nuclear match in Asia-Pacific powderkeg

[RIMPAC]

Yeah, if Americans were like that America would gone too. The fact is America and Americans only understand strength. Until the America mainland is seriously in play, there is no peace. That is why any country who wish to be independent must have a credible attack on America mainland, until then America would just bomb you. Nothing worst than a nation who acts with impunity.

Excellent point. China must develop offensive weapons that can strike the American mainland conventionally and non-conventionally. Only when America knows China can destroy the American mainland will the Americans think twice before going to war with China.

 

[Fsjal]

Doesn't matter, we have never had a no-first use policy against the major nations like China or Russia and we have not fired off nukes yet, so you will have to trust us with that history. It is also our prerogative to not have one. I'm guessing you don't trust Russia either.

If America is responsible of looking after their nukes, then I might just trust you. For Russia, I have fears of terrorists stealing their nukes, same with Pakistan.

 

[JSCh]

Why would a nation with the most powerful conventional military force in the world adopt a first use policy???????????????

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

China: Let's bring it on the table, more action and less talking.

 

[A1Kaid]

War has been faught since creation of our universe.... Dark vs light.... Nothing can stop war.... Golden age is about Peace after nuclear war.... Earth saw 3 nuclear wars 4th one will spark by pakistan and world will join in.... No one can stop cleansing.... You cant hide history.... Golden age will spark nuclear war and than there will be peace, love and building everything that been lost in war.... i wish i was wrong.... But its the law of golden age.... Happened 3 times at period of 10,000 years gap between all 3 nuclear wars....
History’s lost lesson: Ancient nuclear war among Indus Valley civilizations reexamined | The Extinction Protocol: 2012 and beyond
Ancient Weapons of Mass Destruction & The Mahabharata
The First Global Nuclear War and a Coverup of historical proportions...

We will use the weapon technology given to us by the Tall Greys (our galactic allies). We have defense treaty with them.

 

[anon45]

Enough to Wipe out US from the Map. LOL lol lol talk big but small ball is what USA is doing right now.

Well according to publicly available sources, the number of nuclear warheads China has are 240 or so total, with ~120 of those on ICBM's capable of reaching the US. The number of warheads the the US has that can reach China are ~1,722 warheads based on ICBM's, submarines, and strategic bombers.

The US has 5000+ Nuclear warheads in total.

This is the estimate as of Nov 2012.

Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance | Arms Control Association

I'm pretty sure you are the one talking big, and please don't bring up that discredited study on 3000 Chinese nukes in tunnels, lol.

 

[anon45]

I'm not condemning the US for dropping the 2 a-bombs on Japan, on the contrary it's probably the best thing the US did for ending the war in the Pacific. What the US does is portraying other countries as evil nations if they are in possession of wmd. The US still have a large amount of chemical weapons stored away and who can guarantee the US won't be using them in the future?

Here are some interesting articles you might want to read.
Operation Red Hat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Project 112 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unethical human experimentation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The US doesn't take issue with countries simply due to possession of WMD's but depends on the circumstances of how they are acquired, how prolific they are in spreading this knowledge, and how they are used (or threatened to be used).

Seeing as most nations are part of the NPT, there is enough of a reason for right there.

As for North Korea look to the rest.


With regards to chemical weapons, we aren't the only ones who have chemical weapons stored away, and we are party to the chemical weapons treaty, forbidding use in warfare.

If that is not enough of a guarantee for you, then nothing can be guaranteed, neither China's NFU policy, nor Russia launching nukes at the US tomorrow, nor the US launching nukes at Russia. At some point a level of faith in the other party is demanded.

Of course it is best to have additional verification by a neutral party to leave as little to 'faith' as possible, but you cannot verify future intentions.

 

[anon45]

Excellent point. China must develop offensive weapons that can strike the American mainland conventionally and non-conventionally. Only when America knows China can destroy the American mainland will the Americans think twice before going to war with China.

Not really, we rely on you to not be suicidal, if you are not willing to compromise with our own interests, then we both die, and that's that. No more China, No more US

Why would a nation with the most powerful conventional military force in the world adopt a first use policy???????????????

Its not adopt a first use policy, its reserving the right. There is a difference.

 

[Ayush]

War has been faught since creation of our universe.... Dark vs light.... Nothing can stop war.... Golden age is about Peace after nuclear war.... Earth saw 3 nuclear wars 4th one will spark by pakistan and world will join in.... No one can stop cleansing.... You cant hide history.... Golden age will spark nuclear war and than there will be peace, love and building everything that been lost in war.... i wish i was wrong.... But its the law of golden age.... Happened 3 times at period of 10,000 years gap between all 3 nuclear wars....
History’s lost lesson: Ancient nuclear war among Indus Valley civilizations reexamined | The Extinction Protocol: 2012 and beyond
Ancient Weapons of Mass Destruction & The Mahabharata
The First Global Nuclear War and a Coverup of historical proportions...

what do you do man.where do u get all these?are u a researcher?or someone who is interested in space?

 

[JSCh]

Not really, we rely on you to not be suicidal, if you are not willing to compromise with our own interests, then we both die, and that's that. No more China, No more US



Its not adopt a first use policy, its reserving the right. There is a difference.

That is just rhetoric.

It is not a secret that US strategic force was build on a first strike policy. And US keep pushing the envelop with star war (SDI), MIRV, missile defense shield and what not. One wonder what is US real intention?

What is the need to put preemptive strike against China into law? Did China threaten to cross the pacific and invade US? Frankly, I could not think of another scenario that would prompt a US first strike. Dumping of US treasury? Wah, we would all die because of that!! Better to lift FED limit to infinity and print money to buy all China sell. Dollar might go down the toilet but better than dying.

 

[jhungary]

There are one funny fact happenin' in this forum, and just here, not anywhere.

When you see the Word "United States", "Attack", "Nuclear" and "China"

People on either camp have see the need to defend anything regarding the article. No one care about the fact to the matter is. US have a First Use Policy to any Nuclear Capable Country. at least this is last time i check when i was still in the Army.

If you have Nuclear Stockpile, chances are we WILL HAVE AN ENVELOPE on First Strike package on you. This is not just China, we said the same to Russia, North Korea, Even Israel or France, if any country point their nuke at us, we will have a first strike package readying for them.

People listen to news how they want, but how they spin the news is another problem, and honestly speaking, no one care about the fact of the news when the news have the word 'United States" and "China" Involve.

 

[RayKalm]

If America is responsible of looking after their nukes, then I might just trust you. For Russia, I have fears of terrorists stealing their nukes, same with Pakistan.

It's simply impossible for 'terrorists' to steal nukes. This is a myth.

 

[lcloo]

When threatened by nuke power, just email isro222 for help. He will get the Great Grey Ones to neutralised nuke weapons on Earth.

 

[feilong]

Well according to publicly available sources, the number of nuclear warheads China has are 240 or so total, with ~120 of those on ICBM's capable of reaching the US. The number of warheads the the US has that can reach China are ~1,722 warheads based on ICBM's, submarines, and strategic bombers.

The US has 5000+ Nuclear warheads in total.

This is the estimate as of Nov 2012.

Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance | Arms Control Association

I'm pretty sure you are the one talking big, and please don't bring up that discredited study on 3000 Chinese nukes in tunnels, lol.

Don't be a moron like an Indian. China not just building the 3000 miles tunnel for aircrafts and other little missile or tanks. china has more than 32 tunnels like this somewhere like this in china. You would never know how much nuke warhead chinese already has, so it is enough to wipe out US of A. Stop talk big and act as big, US got small ball when come to china or russia. lol even the Iran and North korea as well can Screw US around.

 

[j20blackdragon]

"Go ahead, make my day."

DF-31A

Type 094

DF-41