What's new

US soldier released in exchange for Afghan Gitmo detainees

nangyale

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
US soldier Bowe Bergdahl freed by Taliban in Afghanistan

_72326549_bergdahl.jpg

US Army Sgt Bowe Bergdahl was captured in Afghanistan in June 2009 (file photo)

A US soldier who has been held by the Taliban in Afghanistan for nearly five years has been freed in deal that includes the release of five Afghan detainees, US officials say.

US Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, 28, was handed over to US forces in good health, the officials said.

The five Afghan detainees have been released from the US prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


They were handed over to Qatar, which mediated the transfer.


Sgt Bergdahl was the only US soldier being held by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

_75223385_022488163-1.jpg

A video grab image from 2010 showed Sgt Bergdahl in captivity

Officials said he was in good condition and able to walk. He is expected to be transferred to Bagram Air Field, the main US base in Afghanistan, and then on to the United States.

'Broke down'

In a statement, President Barack Obama said Sgt Bergdahl's recovery "is a reminder of America's unwavering commitment to leave no man or woman in uniform behind on the battlefield''.

Officials said the Taliban had handed him over on Saturday evening, local time, in eastern Afghanistan.

_75223774_022015406-1.jpg

The soldier's hometown of Hailey continued to highlight his captivity

Several dozen US special forces were involved in the exchange, they said, which took place near the Pakistani border.

A senior official told the BBC that, once aboard the US helicopter, Sgt Bergdahl wrote "SF?" - asking if they were special operations forces - on a paper plate and showed it to the pilots, who replied: "Yes, we've been looking for you for a long time."

The senior official said: "At that point, Sgt Bergdahl broke down".

The soldier, of Hailey, Idaho, was captured on 30 June 2009, about two months after arriving in eastern Afghanistan.

US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel said Sgt Bergdahl would be given "all the support he needs to help him recover from this ordeal, and we are grateful that he will soon be reunited with his family".

He thanked the emir of Qatar for his role in enabling the transfer to take place.

On the five Guantanamo detainees, he said: "The United States has co-ordinated closely with Qatar to ensure that security measures are in place and the national security of the United States will not be compromised."

In January, the US military obtained a new video of Sgt Bergdahl, giving his family renewed hope of his eventual return.

Throughout his captivity, the soldier's hometown had continued to remember him with special events and yellow ribbons pinned to utility poles and trees.
 
.
Who are the released Gitmo prisoners?

Mohammad Fazl served as the Taliban's deputy defence minister during America's military campaign in 2001.

Khirullah Khairkhwa was a senior Taliban official serving as interior minister and governor of Herat, Afghanistan's third largest city. Alleged to have had direct links to Osama Bin Laden.

Abdul Haq Wasiq was the Taliban's deputy minister of intelligence. Said to have been central in forming alliances with other Islamist groups to fight against US and coalition forces.

Mullah Norullah Noori was a senior Taliban military commander and a governor.

Mohammad Nabi Omari held multiple Taliban leadership roles, including chief of security. Alleged to have been involved in attacks against US and coalition forces.
 
.
Biographies of the Prisoners released (amended)


000579-238x200.jpg





The ‘Guantanamo Five’ are not the only Afghans, or even the only Taleban, still held at Guantanamo. According to theNew York Times/NPR ‘Guantanamo Docket’ website (read here), there are still 18 Afghans incarcerated there, but, aside from Abdul Nabi Omari, they are the major Taleban figures still inside: Khairkhwa the former governor of Herat and one of the founding fathers of the Taleban movement, Fazl, former head of the Army, Nuri, former head of the northern zone, and Wasiq, former deputy head of Afghanistan’s intelligence agency. Some of these names have been discussed for release before, including by President Karzai and the High Peace Council (for reporting, see here and here) and as a demand from the Taleban (here) .

At least one of the five, the former deputy intelligence chief, Abdul Haq Wasiq, was arrested in 2001 by the US army in a sting operation after he had handed himself in to the new Afghan government in good faith. This was one of many such detentions of major Taleban figures involving deception or duplicity in the early months of the US intervention, as Anand Gopal has detailed in a 2010 report (read here). It was a tactic which helped sow the seeds of insurgency, in that it showed that Taleban would not be allowed to live in peace after the fall of their regime.

Freeing prisoners is invariably one of the demands of any non-state armed group trying to reach a political settlement and the Taleban are no exception. This is always a difficult and contentious issue for the state concerned, even when it is necessary for a peace process. If the ‘Guantanamo Five’ are released to house arrest in Qatar with proper safeguards, it is difficult to see how they could return to fight in Afghanistan.

It seems important, therefore, to be honest about the allegations made about the five. All or some of the five have been labelled in press reports as war criminals, but without giving details of where, when and against whom the crimes supposedly took place. There is only real evidence against Mullah Fazl Mazlum and the allegations against him were known about at the time – that he had command responsibility when civilians were massacred and civilian property wilfully destroyed. Many figures in government today have similar records. As will be looked at in depth in a second blog, claims made in the Guantanamo Bay tribunals and in press reports sourced to un-named US officials, frequently do not stand up to close inspection.

Detail on alleged war crimes referred to in this blog comes from the Afghanistan Justice Project (read here), the suppressed United Nations Mapping Report of 2005 (read here), various UN and Human Rights Watch reports from the time and interviews with survivors and witnesses. Allegations against the five made by the US authorities can be found in official documents released, either under a Freedom of Information request (read them on this New York Times/NPR website) or by Wikileaks (read them here).



Mullah Khairullah Khairkhwa

Khairkhwa is the most senior of the five on the list. Now in his mid-40s and a Popalzai from Arghestan in Kandahar, several people who knew him described him as ‘eagle-eyed’ and intelligent. He is one of the fraternity of original Taleban who launched the movement in 1994 – in other words, he is someone who will still command a great deal of influence and respect among today’s insurgents.

It is mystifying to know where the Guantanamo Bay authorities got the idea that Khairkhwa was known, in their words, as a ‘hardliner in terms of Taleban philosophy.’ During the Emirate, he was considered one of the more moderate Taleban in leadership circles, along with commanders like Mullah Burjan (killed in 1996) and Mullah Omar’s deputy, Mullah Rabbani, who died of cancer in April 2001 (although his name stayed on the UN sanctions list for years). I met Khairkhwa in September 2000. Unlike many Taleban, he was comfortable speaking to a foreigner and, very unusually, happy to be interviewed in Persian (most Taleban would only speak Pashto at the time). Herat, where he was the governor, was noticeably more relaxed than Kabul, Mazar or Kandahar: I filmed openly in the city (then an illegal act), the economy was reasonably buoyant and women came up to chat – a very rare occurrence.

It is believed, report Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn, who present biographies of many Taleban in their new book,* that Khairkhwa was educated in the Haqqaniya and Akhora Khattak madrassas in Pakistan and fought with the Harakat-e Enqelab-e Islami party during the 1980s jihad against the Soviets. He was a Taleban spokesman in the early days (1994-1996) and briefly Interior Minister following the Taleban takeover of Kabul. One witness who was in Mazar-e Sharif when the Taleban captured the city in 1997 placed him as a commander there, leading forces from western Afghanistan, although the witness said he did not participate in the defection agreement conducted in Faryab with General Malik. After the Taleban took Mazar, the city rebelled and thousands of Taleban were killed, some in fighting, but most afterwards by Malik, when they were prisoners of war. The bulk of Taleban forces were driven out and, according to the witness, Khairkhwa led those Taleban who withdrew westwards. He eventually established a new frontline in Murghab.**

There is one incident in which Khairkhwa may have had command and control responsibility, although this has not been substantiated.*** During the 1997 retreat, Taleban and/or their local Hezb-e Islami allies killed several dozen civilians in villages in the Dehdadi district of Balkh province. This area had suffered and would continue to suffer tit for tat attacks by both Pashtun and Hazara armed groups against ‘each others’’ civilians. The 1997 killings are referred to in a UN report (here) with the possibility that they were carried out by Taleban or by local Pashtun, Hezb-e Islami commanders, who were under Taleban orders.****

Khairullah subsequently became governor of Herat and witnesses do not place him as having taken part in the second campaign to capture Mazar in 1998 when the Taleban murdered thousands of mainly Hazara civilians, both men and boys, in revenge killings which were accompanied by explicitly anti-Shi’a rhetoric.

In February 2002, Khairullah was arrested by the Pakistani authorities and handed over to the Americans; after a short period of detention in Kandahar, he was transferred to Guantánamo jail. His name has come up repeatedly for possible release – including in February 2011 by the High Peace Council (for reporting, see here) Khairullah also featured in a case taken to the Federal District Court in Washington DC in March 2011, which sought his release because of ‘unlawful detention’. Hekmat Karzai, the director of the Centre for Conflict and Peace Studies and cousin of President Karzai, backed the case, saying he thought fair treatment of prisoners prevented further radicalisation and could aid reconciliation. ‘Mr Khairkhwa is well respected amongst the Taliban and was considered a moderate by those who knew him,’ he told Al-Jazeera (read here). ‘We believe he can help in creating the address for the Taliban that is needed in this peace process.’ The two also share the same tribal background.



Mullah Fazl Mazlum

Mullah Fazl was also a famous name during the Taleban era. He is a Kakar, originally from Tirin Kot in Uruzgan, and is also old enough to have fought at a junior level during the 1980s jihad. While not one of the original Taleban, he joined early and rose through the ranks because of his fighting ability. He ended up as one of the most important and feared commanders of the Emirate and was head of the Army Corps in 2001. Unlike other Taleban commanders, he never took a civilian post. There is evidence documented by the Afghanistan Justice Project (AJP) that he had command responsibilities for two grave breaches of the laws of armed conflict.

In 1999, he was one of the senior field commanders in the Shomali offensive, leading forces along the Old Road to Mirbacha Kot (while Mullah Dadullah – killed while fighting in 2007 – commanded forces further west, on the New Road connecting Kabul with Bagram). The victorious Taleban destroyed civilian infrastructure in Shomali on an industrial scale – burning houses, vineyards, orchards and destroying irrigation systems; they also summarily executed civilians and surrendered Northern Alliance fighters and forcibly displaced civilians, contributing to an exodus of 300,000 people. AJP reports:

One eye witness, who fought with the Taliban specifically implicates Mullah Fazil as supervising the wanton destruction of civilian infrastructure. On August 10, 1999, this commander went for a meeting with Mullah Fazil, near the front line, in Kalakan District. He observed widespread, deliberate destruction to houses and shops in the area. Fazil was in the field, supervising demolition operations.

Fazl also had what AJP calls ‘strategic responsibility’ as head of the army corps when the Taleban were trying to subdue resistance in and around Yakowlang (Bamyian province) in 2001, involving a series of massacres of civilians and the burning of villages. Others are also implicated, both those on the ground and in other command positions.***** AJP says Fazl, ‘visited occasionally, including during major operations,’ and that he, ‘must have been involved in the planning and supervision of the operation.’



Nurullah Nuri

Nuri was head of the northern zone (rais-e tanzim-e shomal) and governor of Balkh – both administrative, not military positions – when he was captured in November 2001. A Tokhi from Zabul, he was too young to fight in the 1980s jihad and joined the Taleban as they were expanding northwards. Not a member of the original Taleban ‘band of brothers’, he nonetheless rose through the ranks, holding a number of provincial governor positions – in Wardak, Laghman and Baghlan – before ending up in charge of the north. I have seen no evidence of the accusation framed by AP (here) that he – note the passive voice – ‘has been accused of ordering the massacre of thousands of Shiite Muslims.’ This throwaway accusation is also made by the Wall Street Journal, again without any substantiation (read here); unless and until proper details – date, place and Nuri’s alleged command position – are presented, it looks like a generic allegation and should be discounted.

Along with Fazl and the late Mullah Dadullah, Nuri negotiated the surrender of Taleban fighters in Kunduz (concluded on 26 November 2001) with General Dostum and the late General Daud. The Taleban believed the peaceful surrender of men and weapons was to be in exchange for safe passage home and indeed, a meeting with Dostum, Muhaqqiq and Atta was filmed. The deal actually ended in chaos and bloodshed – the prisoner uprising and its violent quashing in Qala-e Jangi and the suffocating to death of thousands of Taleban prisoners and their burial in Dasht-e Laili. This final massacre of the 1978-2001 conflict is something which Dostum and his US Special Forces allies have yet to address. As for the three Taleban leaders who surrendered, Dadullah managed to flee; the other two, Fazl and Nuri, were handed over to US forces and have been in Guantanamo since.

The Wall Street Journal, cited above, quotes a ‘confidential annex of the Administration’s 2010 review’ (review of what is not specified), saying that both Fazl and Nuri are suspected of having killed the CIA agent, Johnny Michael Spann, at Qala-e Jangi, but again without giving details. Given that there were hundreds of prisoners and the identities of most were unclear at the time, I would want to hear detailed evidence before taking this seriously, especially as allegations made in Guantanamo are so peculiar and random. Moreover, the factual basis appears unsafe. Qala-e Jangi, a huge, mud-built fortress, is about 20 minutes’ drive from Mazar-e Sharif. According to senior Northern Alliance sources who were in Mazar, the high-ranking Taleban leaders were held, because of their rank, in a separate guesthouse in the Kodibarq complex in Mazar city and were not used to try to calm the situation in the Qala.


Abdul Haq Wasiq

He was deputy chief of the Taleban ‘Estakhbarat’ (Intelligence). He was appointed after his cousin, Qari Ahmadullah, became its head. Ahmadullah, a founding member of the Taleban, was reported killed in a US bombing raid in early January, 2002. Wasiq is an Andar, from Ghazni province. He was detained in a sting operation in late 2001 in Ghazni, after being tricked by a subordinate whom he knew had travelled to Pakistan to see Rahim Wardak (former minister of defence) to start cooperating with the US. The subordinate told Wasiq he had set up a meeting with the Hezb-e Wahdat leader, Abdul Karim Khalili, with whom he could negotiate a security guarantee for safe passage to Kabul and reintegration. Wasiq and Khalili are known to have previously been in contact. One listener to the BBC in November 2001 remembers Wasiq saying that ‘Mr Khalili’ had agreed to give safe passage through Hazarajat to Taleban forces fleeing southwards. However, when Wasiq turned up at the rendezvous, instead of Khalili being there, he was delivered to a US Special Forces team and has been in Guantanamo ever since.



Abdul Nabi Omari

The final Taleb named on the list, Omari , is a minor figure from Khost. One witness said he worked as a judge in Khost during the Emirate. He may also have worked in the Ministry of Tribes and Borders under the then ministership of Jalaluddin Haqqani. If he has connections as a client to the Haqqanis, that may explain why this junior figure is on the list for release – given the US desire to secure the release of their soldier, Bowe Bergdahl, whose capture in 2009 was claimed by a Haqqani commander, Mullah Sangin (for details on the case, see here). Witnesses who know the Khost Taleban were mystified as to why the US authorities believe Omari is one of the major figures they have in custody.



* ‘An Enemy We Created’: The Myth of the Taliban/Al-Qaeda Merger in Afghanistan, 1970-2010’.

** The other tranche of fighters was led first south to Baghlan and then to Kunduz by Mullahs Dadullah, Fazl and Amir Khan Muttaqi (the Taleban minister of information and culture and then education and currently head of the Taleban’s media committee).

*** In order for Khairkhwa to be held guilty for the Dehdadi killings, it would need to be proved that he had ‘command responsibility’, in other words that he ordered or instigated his subordinates to kill the civilians or failed to prevent them from carrying out the killings or failed to punish them afterwards. Article 28 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court specifies the following requirements in establishing command responsibility:

• The subordinates must be under the effective command and control, or the effective authority or control of the superior;

• The military commander knew or should have known that his forces were committing or about to commit such a crime;

• The military commander failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures to prevent the crimes or to punish them by submitting them to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.

*** I reported on 4 June 2001 on Khairullah’s reaction to a Taleban Vice and Virtue police raid on Herat’s central hospital and their forcible trimming of the beards of medical staff and patients. After doctors fought back and complained to Khairullah, he publically condemned the raid and disciplined the police. Ahmad Rashid also carried the story:

… hospital staff and people, including women [joined] in a march to the house of Mullah Khairullah Khairkhwa, the governor of Herat. Mullah Khairkhwa reprimanded the religious police but Herat remains tense due to the standoff with the official Taliban administration and the young vigilantes of the religious police. (6 June 2001, The Daily Telegraph)

**** The other tranche of retreating Taleban killed dozens of Hazara civilians in Qizilabad, as well as 50 Junbesh prisoners at Qala-e Kul Muhammad.

***** AJP also names the following as having command and control responsibilities during the various killings and village burnings of 2001: Mullah Shahzad, in charge of the Yakowlang strike force, Mullah Abdul Sattar, regional military commander for Hazarajat, Jihadyar and Mullah Dadullah, both front commanders, Qari Ahmadullah, head of intelligence, Abdul Rizaq (minister of the interior), and Mullah Omar (head of state).
 
.
Indians are very worried about this development , wondering but not knowing what was Pakistan's role in all this

With each passing day indians can sense that their time of hiding in america's underpants in Afghanistan is coming to an end.
 
.
Indians are very worried about this development , wondering but not knowing what was Pakistan's role in all this

With each passing day indians can sense that their time of hiding in america's underpants in Afghanistan is coming to an end.
The time for Indians hiding under the American security umbrella in Afghanistan and carrying out terrorist activities in Pakistan is coming to an end.
They either need to send ground troops to Afghanistan or run for the exits as everybody else from the Western alliance is doing.
 
.
Indians are very worried about this development , wondering but not knowing what was Pakistan's role in all this

With each passing day indians can sense that their time of hiding in america's underpants in Afghanistan is coming to an end.
dont know about Pakistan but Quetta shura in balochistan celebrated this news with sweets and palao ;)
 
.
Bowe Bergdahl: Taliban release dramatic video of handover to US
Video shows sergeant, freed five years after being captured in Afghanistan, being led to helicopter by men waving white cloth
View attachment 33847View attachment 33848

A still from the Taliban video Link to video: Bowe Bergdahl release video: 'Don't come back to Afghanistan'
The Taliban have released a dramatic video of the moment US soldier Bowe Bergdahl was handed over to American special forces after five years in captivity.

He is patted down for bombs or weapons and a plastic bag that contains his only possessions is tossed away by his rescuers. Then, after less than a minute on the ground, the helicopter lifts away again for an American base, and subtitles flash across the screen: "Don' come back to afghanistan [sic]"

A-still-from-the-video-sh-009.jpg

A still from the video showing Bowe Bergdahl's release.

The video is likely to infuriate the US military by giving a glimpse of Bergdahl's condition and details of the secretive handover, including showing the face of at least one of the special forces team who carried it out. The elite commandos keep their identities secret while they serve.

At one point during the video, one of the three people who climbed out of the black hawk to collect Bergdahl appears to be gesturing at the cameraman to back away. And hours after the short film was posted, the link to it went dead, although there are already dozens of copies on news websites.

The sight of US forces shaking hands with Bergdahl's Taliban guards and then waving to their battlefield enemies as they return to the waiting aircraft may also inflame debate in America, where there has been some criticism of the deal brokered for his release.

Bergdahl was exchanged for five senior Taliban who had been held at Guantánamo prison, including a former army chief, a deputy spy chief and one of the founders of the movement. They were sent to Qatar and must stay there for a year, a condition guaranteed by the ruler of the tiny Gulf State.

US President Barack Obama has been accused of negotiating with terrorists, although the Taliban are not listed by the US as a terror organisation. Some members of Congress also say he broke the law by not giving them advance notice of the swap.

The initial excitement about recovering Bergdahl has also been clouded by claims from soldiers who served with him, that he had deserted his post in 2009 when he was captured.

Bowe-Bergdahl-in-a-video--009.jpg

Bowe Bergdahl in a video showing his release.

The video starts with images of Guantánamo prison and the arrival in Qatar of five detainees who were exchanged for the American hostage.

About four minutes in, it switches to Bergdahl waiting for release in a battered pickup truck in scrubby wilderness just off a dirt road. A Taliban voice-over explains the scene, in a violent corner of eastern Afghanistan where a temporary cease-fire was declared for the handover.

A-still-from-the-video-sh-009.jpg

A still from the video showing Bowe Bergdahl's release.

"We told them there are 18 armed fighters and the Americans said that's all right," the narrator says.

The camera zooms in on nearby hillsides to show Taliban soldiers standing guard with rocket-propelled grenades and AK-47s, some with their faces covered by scarves but others in full view of the camera. Planes, presumably US surveillance craft, circle overhead.

The 28-year-old American is sitting by the window in a traditional loose white trousers and shirt, new or freshly washed for the occasion. He looks extremely nervous, with a twitch in one eye, though not particularly thin and later he walks easily towards the waiting aircraft.

As they wait, he appears to exchange a few words with his captors, backing up comments from his father that since his disappearance in 2009 he had learned Pashto, the language of most Taliban, and forgotten some of his English. The last video of him speaking his mother tongue that has been made public was shot in 2010.

Beside the truck one man flies a white Taliban flag tied to a rough tree branch, and a second fighter appears to coordinate the operation. In the next shot, Bergdahl is standing outside the vehicle, with a shawl over his shoulder, scanning the sky anxiously as two Black Hawk helicopters circle.

Then one helicopter lands and three men walk swiftly out to meet another trio – Bergdahl and two captors. The American team, likely including an Afghan interpreter, briefly shake hands with the Taliban and pat down Bergdahl's torso before leading him to the helicopter.

As they walk, they look back and wave. By the aircraft a small red and white plastic bag, which is the only thing Bergdahl was carrying away from his years in captivity, is thrown away by his rescuers and he is patted far more thoroughly. Then he climbs on board, his rescuers take their seats at the edge of the craft and the helicopter lifts off again.

Bergdahl is now in a military hospital in Germany, undergoing physical and mental assessments; he has not yet been reunited with his family.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
dont know about Pakistan but Quetta shura in balochistan celebrated this news with sweets and palao ;)

Old Quetta shura members, whose families are kept hostages by ISI, are respected but not followed by Taliban commanders who are actually present on the ground and are leading the fighters.

@pakdefender is an idiot, lot has changed after 9/11, Pakistan has lost respect and credibility in the ranks and files of Taliban. Only haqqani group are listening to ISI, in exchange of sanctuary in North waziristan. It is understandable as haqqanis are linked with ISI since 70s.

The time for Indians hiding under the American security umbrella in Afghanistan and carrying out terrorist activities in Pakistan is coming to an end.
They either need to send ground troops to Afghanistan or run for the exits as everybody else from the Western alliance is doing.

Describe the constructive role of Pakistan in Afghanistan?. Last time i checked, kunar is getting "invaded" by Pakistan army with gunship helicopters and hundreds of rockets shot on Afghan villages on border. Neither Afghan Taliban or Kabul is o.k with this.
 
.
Old Quetta shura members, whose families are kept hostages by ISI, are respected but not followed by Taliban commanders who are actually present on the ground and are leading the fighters.

@pakdefender is an idiot, lot has changed after 9/11, Pakistan has lost respect and credibility in the ranks and files of Taliban. Only haqqani group are listening to ISI, in exchange of sanctuary in North waziristan. It is understandable as haqqanis are linked with ISI since 70s.



Describe the constructive role of Pakistan in Afghanistan?. Last time i checked, kunar is getting "invaded" by Pakistan army with gunship helicopters and hundreds of rockets shot on Afghan villages on border. Neither Afghan Taliban or Kabul is o.k with this.

Sir we are building hospitals etc in Afghanistan with our own resources. This year another 3 billion aid will be given to Afghanistan looking at budget pdf file. Remember sir we are poor nation as well, and that money instead can be spend on our undeveloped areas as well.
 
.
Indians are very worried about this development , wondering but not knowing what was Pakistan's role in all this

With each passing day indians can sense that their time of hiding in america's underpants in Afghanistan is coming to an end.

Bhai mere , kuch threads tho discuss kar liya karo bina india ko beech main laye.
 
.
Sir we are building hospitals etc in Afghanistan with our own resources. This year another 3 billion aid will be given to Afghanistan looking at budget pdf file. Remember sir we are poor nation as well, and that money instead can be spend on our undeveloped areas as well.
What hospitals? provide me the links.
 
. .
Sir this news is all over google. But how do they pay back? Couple of months back they kidnapped Pakistani NESPAK engineers for ransom.
Pakistan doesnt need to pay back.........Stopping of shelling of Afghan villages in kunar by pakistan, which has been going on for years, would be a positive step. The damage to the properties in kunar and other border areas by Pakistani shelling, would exceed the cost of any hospital.
 
.
Pakistan doesnt need to pay back.........Stopping of shelling of Afghan villages in kunar by pakistan, which has been going on for years, would be a positive step. The damage to the properties in kunar and other border areas by Pakistani shelling, would exceed the cost of any hospital.

Sir properties of terrorists most be destroyed when they run back to Kunar. They most know no rat hole is safe for them. We need to put all of them in one place and rats will eat each other out Skyfall style.
 
.
Sir properties of terrorists most be destroyed when they run back to Kunar. They most know no rat hole is safe for them. We need to put all of them in one place and rats will eat each other out Skyfall style.
Zarvan ki rooh sama kar gai hey kya ?:-)
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom