What's new

US shifting alliance to Iran in the Middle East - Thoughts?

I've stopped reading after that

The talibans as Al Qaeda in general are your agents oppressing everybody so it can give you a reason to invade countries or to pretend to defend them disguised as freedom fighters.

The talibans have never fought you as only 7 ISAF soldiers have been killed between 2001 & 2003.

You always say Iran is with Israel/USA when actually they are under your savage embargo and you create Al Qaeda who hate them

You also say that the invasion of Iraq was Iran shaking hands with the USA to do that. In reality it's from wahabit countries or muslim brother countries that are very hostile against Iran that Iraq was invaded by USA: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, NATO Turkey

Um okay mate, so do you support Iraq during Saddam rule, if yes then it explained well you rather have him than the government now and oppose having Iran as an ally.

And btw, i'm talking about my first lengthy post of this thread, not my previous so read it again and it'll make sense to you because if you did then you wouldn't say Saudi Arabia or Turkey helped the US during the invasion. Would Turkey see a president who slaughtered Kurds or a president who supported autonomy? Would Saudi Arabia support a president who persecute Shiites or having a Shiite president who sees Iran as loyalist? Keep that in your head.
 
Would Turkey see a president who slaughtered Kurds or a president who supported autonomy?
You are supporting NATO Turkey, so don't make as if you care for the kurds

And you gave Saddam a list of 600 intellectuals to kill before he becomes president, so please don't play your white virgin.

The CIA also played a central role in preparing the death lists of those who were to be eliminated after the coup by squads from the Ba'ath party. Mr Aburish says that he believes 5,000 were killed of whom he has collected the names of 600, including many doctors, lawyers, teachers and professors who formed the educated elite of Iraq.



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ddam-on-the-bloody-road-to-power-1258618.html



Saddam also becomes a leader of the Ba'ath Party's student cell in Cairo and reportedly regularly visits the U.S. embassy to meet with CIA agents interested in sparking Gen. Kassem's overthrow.



In February, Kassem is assassinated by members of the Ba'ath Party and the CIA helps the Ba'athists by providing lists of suspected communists for the party's hit squads, who kill an estimated 800 people. Saddam returns home and rejoins the party as an interrogator, torturer and killer. Nine months later, the army overthrows the Ba'ath Party and Saddam is jailed. He is said to have studied the political tactics of Hitler and Stalin while in prison.



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/longroad/etc/cron.html
 
If the US wants to have a real friend and to gain a comfortable foothold in the ME, its best bet is to ally with Iran.

The Iranian people in general like the American people, their culture. It's only the hardcore Islamist who dislike the US because of ideology.

The Iranians sentiments are more in tune with the Americans than the rest of the people of ME countries except may be Israelis.

I for one support this alliance.
 
If the US wants to have a real friend and to gain a comfortable foothold in the ME, its best bet is to ally with Iran.

The Iranian people in general like the American people, their culture. It's only the hardcore Islamist who dislike the US because of ideology.

The Iranians sentiments are more in tune with the Americans than the rest of the people of ME countries except may be Israelis.

I for one support this alliance.


Because, in general Shite sect is more moderate than Sunnies.
 
If the US wants to have a real friend and to gain a comfortable foothold in the ME, its best bet is to ally with Iran.

The Iranian people in general like the American people, their culture. It's only the hardcore Islamist who dislike the US because of ideology.

The Iranians sentiments are more in tune with the Americans than the rest of the people of ME countries except may be Israelis.

I for one support this alliance.
Funniest statement i've seen since days. I don't think much people in the ME love you, except the salafists & the wahabits to whom you give air support and strategic help.

Even you make a big comedy with the Gitmo prison to deceive people and make believe that you are not the master of those beheaders
 
1-If the US wants to have a real friend and to gain a comfortable foothold in the ME, its best bet is to ally with Iran.

2-The Iranian people in general like the American people, their culture. It's only the hardcore Islamist who dislike the US because of ideology.

3-The Iranians sentiments are more in tune with the Americans than the rest of the people of ME countries except may be Israelis.
.

1- i agree . thumbs up !

2- looks like u know iranians more than themselves :D no , i myself oppose relations with united states as i see no honesty in americans and thats why i oppose it but if any iranian opposes that its for the good of their people . there is no hardliner , extremist in iran .

3-thumbs down!! :D :D cant disagree more . if u were iranian , u would know.

p.s "maybe" israhell?? LOL bro rest of your comment was logical exept this "maybe" !!! :D
 
^^^ My sentence was mis-constructed or words were mis-used on #3. I meant to say may be excluding Israelis.
I guess you still do not like the may be part. Points taken.

Back to grammar school.....
 
^^^ Not you. Me.

got ur point , i need it too :)

anyway as u said there are lots of iranians who dont oppose having relations with us based on mutual respect . they also participated in election and the president turned out to be on their side .

anyway he is the president of iran now , so his words are the words of the whole nation and though has everyones support :D
 
^^^^ I can't comment on Iranian Politics since I don't know much about it. What I know are second hand, third hand.

I do love the Persian culture. I like the Persians. They are graceful being. Very true to their feelings.
 
Iran cannot accept ceasefire and saddam dog was occupying their land

"Army Chief of Staff General Ali Sayad Shirazi, wanted to accept the ceasefire, as most of Iranian soil had been recaptured."
(Karsh, Efraim ( 2002). The Iran–Iraq War: 1980–1988. Osprey Publishing. pp. 1–8, 12–16, 19–82.)
And after the first ceasfire offer , the govt of iran would have demanded that iraq leave the small area of iran it still held and we would have moved towards ending the war instead of planning to invade iraq and letting the war carry on for another 6 odd years.
Saddam is to blame for starting the war but iran was to blame for the continuation of it.
 
Brought back by you as you are the dogs of the USA to attack Iran

what?



He wanted peace that's why he attacked Iran, very good.

Saddam attacked iran and thought it would fall apart at the first shot but instead iran hit back and regained the majority of the lost territory.
After that Saddam realized it would be better to have peace, which iran rejected.

Is the simple enough for you!....or should i use crayons next time?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom