US set to clash with China at UN over bid to blacklist JeM's Masood Azhar

[maximuswarrior]

I didn't argue anything but you deliberately omit the word Established nicely try , when a mechanism was established any member will have to respect otherwise what is the point to set rule and mechanism in UN?

Most likely China will look forward on how India will explain with their accusation, if they can't provide any proof, India will look really bad in UN.

The Indians and the Americans want to become judge, jury and executioner all at once.

LOL at the flyer stunt. Desperate fvcks.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Then why so worried and issuing statements over statements, huh??

Just go and do whatever you are claiming here, ask for more evidances. LOL

Only criminal need to be worry, we're there to inforce UN law and make sure India is not violating it...LMAO

 

[maximuswarrior]

Lol...Blah blah blah to you too mate

LOL how many flyers did you spread?

 

[Cmdr Keen]

the lure of being known as a "peaceful rising" nation is a relic of rube past like the long gone 20th century. In the 21st century, only sabre rattling war mongering nations that can walk the talk will earn due respect. nations like india that can only war monger but fall flat on their face when it's time to walk the talk become the laughing stock of the world that have to grab onto the real war mongers like the u.s. for help like a comedy relief!

I have to agree with you...perfectly put.

the question is...
will China have the b***s to show its real intention....or will it just wushu sabre rattle more

No one will it take it seriously

 

[GumNaam]

Well, maybe but these aircraft have limited timeframe over the battlefield plus, they are using long range missles. These may be more susceptible to electronic jamming

I have to agree with you...perfectly put.

the question is...
will China have the b***s to show its real intention....or will it just wushu sabre rattle more

No one will it take it seriously

We'll find out. One thing for sure, uncle sam blocking the blacklisting of JuA caused China to block the blacklisting of JeM. It'll have to be a trade now. their is no longer any steam left in the "anti terror" bandwagon. Now everyone knows that everyone else supports terrorism in one form or another.

Blah blah blah.

Keep begging for Uncle Sam’s intervention LOL

You don’t have any proof. Stop crying rivers.



The world witnessed that on the 27th LOL

Exactly. Pakistan proved itself as the silent killer who doesn't put up with any crap.

 

[ziaulislam]

Pakistan shoild ask a resolution that contains the name of smajohta exprrss culprit

 

[YeBeWarned]

Why America or UK or France never even bother to bring forward a resolution to declare Umar Khalid Khurasni a Terrorist ? head of JuA who claimed responsibility of Sehwan mazar Attack ? and many others like it .. ?

 

[Vortex]

Why not move a resolution about Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld and co for having killed millions innocents Iraqis with false evidences ?
And after that a resolution for others guys for the mess in Libya, Syria etc ?

After all if there is a game on resolution then we should play also.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

JEM did not claim responsibility for any attack on India, they were blamed. Since when do you need a resolution at the UN security council about one guy.

Its obviously designed to play on the position of Pakistan and Pak-China and Pak-US relations, questioning Pakistan religion and questioning Pak-Kashmir issues.

Very dangerous game. Too dangerous for most

 

[Cmdr Keen]

Why America or UK or France never even bother to bring forward a resolution to declare Umar Khalid Khurasni a Terrorist ? head of JuA who claimed responsibility of Sehwan mazar Attack ? and many others like it .. ?

What's jua? Who is umar.kalod?

See...that's how much the West knows or cares....

Why does not Pakistan bring dat to the UN...let's see who votes in favor

"Technical hold"

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

JEM did not claim responsibility for any attack on India, they were blamed. Since when do you need a resolution at the UN security council about one guy.

Its obviously designed to play on the position of Pakistan and Pak-China and Pak-US relations, questioning Pakistan religion and questioning Pak-Kashmir issues.

Very dangerous game. Too dangerous for most

It is moments like this Pakistan should realise HOW IMPORTANT it is.

Not some third party scum to be walked all over by others.

 

[Cmdr Keen]

Why not move a resolution about Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld and co for having killed millions innocents Iraqis with false evidences ?
And after that a resolution for others guys for the mess in Libya, Syria etc ?

After all if there is a game on resolution then we should play also.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polop...n/derivatives/landscape_1200/shia-labeouf.jpg

 

[maximuswarrior]

The Americans are in a very tough spot. They are obviously doing the bidding of India and that will come at a high price.

I am very much in favor of US backstabbing whilst Pakistan facilitates the Afghan talks. It should sober up a few critics on our side.

 

[Cmdr Keen]

The Americans are in a very tough spot. They are obviously doing the bidding of India and that will come at a high price.

I am very much in favor of US backstabbing whilst Pakistan facilitates the Afghan talks. It should sober up a few critics on our side.

why do ye care.....aren't ye dutch?

lol ...go back to yer windmills ...

 

[Tom M]

Only criminal need to be worry, we're there to inforce UN law and make sure India is not violating it...LMAO

Where is India Violating any law ??? At-least be sensible while typing any comments.

China is looking forward for India to provide any evident before making any false accusation.

Sure you should. And we will provide the same. But unlike 1267 Sanctions committee where China can put a technical hold indefinitely or for may months without giving any detailed explanation, this time let's have an open discussion on the same with all 15 members of UNSC including China. Let us put our case forward, and China will get enough opportunity to explain why you oppose it if you go by the VETO route. Fair enough right ????