US removes Pakistan from National Security threat list

[nahtanbob]

My national interests relate to Canada, but let's pretend otherwise for a second.

I gave you actual evidence for those numbers, while all you've done is post ascinine comments that are more troll comments than anything with substance.

If you want to convince someone,or get involved with a topic, bring something with substance, otherwise keep your lips sealed.

Other than pulling a number out of the hat you provide no evidence for the losses.

For the record Pakistan nominal GDP is $72 billion in 2001. It is $300 billion in 2018.

You don't know a thing about either 65 or 71. That is very clear now.

FYI Pakistan didn't initiate any of these wars by attack across international border.

71 war was initiated by India by attacking across international border on the night of 20/21 November without formal declaration of war. The whole world remained silent.

USA is not obliged to support a regime that disregards its advice. You ignored the advice of American & Chinese diplomats to seek a political solution in the East.

 

[Cash GK]

USA is better at cultivating friends and alliances than pakistan

You mean Israel

 

[That Guy]

Other than pulling a number out of the hat you provide no evidence for the losses.

I literally gave you two separate links of where those numbers came from. If you repeat the same lie again, you can expect more negative ratings.

You have no idea what you're talking about, **** off.

For the record Pakistan nominal GDP is $72 billion in 2001. It is $300 billion in 2018.

Do you not understand the concept of accumulative costs?

USA is not obliged to support a regime that disregards its advice. You ignored the advice of American & Chinese diplomats to seek a political solution in the East.

It IS however, obliged to pay for services rendered. The US MUST pay for the infrastructure it uses within Pakistan, including LOCs and ALOCs. In fact, Pakistan is currently the ONLY nation will to provide them. Without Pakistan's help, the US would never be able to supple it's troops, and Afghanistan's military forces would also have collapsed by now.

 

[nahtanbob]

Do you not understand the concept of accumulative costs?

Show anytime in your country's history where your GDP quadrupled in 18 years
All the bilateral aid has been scaled back after 2011 which is why your economy is in the toilet

both the links are written by Pakistani sources

 

[That Guy]

Show anytime in your country's history where your GDP quadrupled in 18 years
All the bilateral aid has been scaled back after 2011 which is why your economy is in the toilet

both the links are written by Pakistani sources

Holy shit, you literally have zero understanding of Economics. And now that you can't even defend your initial claim, you're going to attack the source.

Also, Pakistan's economy started tanking in 2007-8, not in 2011. It wasn't to do with aid either, it was to do with the energy crisis, and the massive political shift that Pakistan went through.

You have no idea what you're talking about, just **** off, dude. You aren't interested in debate, your mind is already made up. All you're doing is shit posting.

I also warned you that if you talk out of your ***, you'd be getting negative ratings. I gave you a fair warning. As you aren't contributing to the discussion in any meaningful way, I am going to be enforcing my right.

It's also sad that you're pathetically cherry picking one line, and ignoring everything else I've written constantly.

[Edit] fixed spelling mistakes ,and added more dialogue.

 

[Psychic]

USA is not obliged to support a regime that disregards its advice. You ignored the advice of American & Chinese diplomats to seek a political solution in the East.

What political solution?

Waited for 18 years for the world, UN and India to fulfill their promises on Kashmir a.k.a political solution but they didn't --- Instead, post Sino-India war, the West provided India with significant "civil" aid which in turn allowed India to divert it's own resources to build a massive military --- The world was not interested, India wasn't fulfilling the promises her founding father made on the floor of the UN, and India was growing stronger day by day...

And in 1971, India was the aggressor, not us. They took advantage of civil war and invaded. Even a super power's threats didn't stop them, and you are talkin about a "political solution" --- Go and find some other past time instead of preaching how good and peaceful US and India are and how bad and warmongering Pakistan is.

We are not the bad guys you think we are; Stop reading into Indian propaganda for a start, then we can talk.