What's new

US pressing India to stop IPI project

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
US pressing India to stop IPI project

NEW DELHI: The United States is putting pressure on India to stop the Iran-Pak-India gas pipeline project, as India has come under close watch after the nuclear cooperation agreement concluded recently.

The Indian government is now under open pressure not to conclude the gas pipeline contract or activate the joint agreement with Iran for defence cooperation, Indian newspaper The Asian Age reported on Wednesday.

India has planned naval exercises in West Asia, but it has kept Iran away despite a broader strategic partnership worked out between the two countries in 2003.

Indian vessels will conduct exercises and port calls in West Asia involving Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iran is out of it, the paper said, adding that the Indian Navy had also planned passage exercises with the UK and France navies, although the former is seen by the people of the region as an “occupying force” in Iraq. nni

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\08\02\story_2-8-2007_pg7_51
 
India under pressure to stop Iran pipeline
By SEEMA MUSTAFA

New Delhi, July 31: India’s relationship with Iran has come under the US scanner in the wake of the 123 agreement, with the government now under open pressure not to conclude the gas pipeline contract or activise the joint agreement with Iran for defence cooperation.

The Indian Navy has planned an ambitious programme of naval exercises in West Asia, but has taken care to exclude Iran despite a broader strategic partnership worked out between the two governments at high-level talks in 2003. The Indian naval ships will carry out exercises as well as port calls in West Asia, involving Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Iran is not on the list and when asked about this assistant chief of naval staff looking after foreign cooperation and intelligence, Rear Admiral Pradeep Chauhan, said, "We have not been able to generate an exercise schedule from Iran."

The Indian Navy will also carry out passage exercises during its West Asian programme with the navies of the UK and France, although the former is seen by the people of the region as an "occupying force" in Iraq. Asked about the strategic impact of this decision, Rear Admiral Chauhan said that the Navy was conscious of the sensitivities of the region and had planned the exercises not to disrupt, but to enhance foreign policy initiatives.

Petroleum minister Murli Deora, who was to have visited Pakistan this month for further discussions on the gas pipeline that the Iranians want to conclude by September, has not scheduled his visit. Sources had told this newspaper that the visit was to seal an understanding between Delhi and Islamabad on the transit fee, after which the three countries would be ready to sign a trilateral agreement. The US concerns about the India-Iran relationship have been recorded in the briefings to the media by both US undersecretary Nicholas Burns and the envoy to India, Mr David C. Mulford.

The American media has been carrying critical reports of India’s relations with Iran after the 123 agreement was finalised, with the Wall Street Journal going as far as to say, "getting India to drop, and drop completely its presumptively ceremonial military ties to Iran isn’t asking a lot" as the least that could be expected if "the (US) Congress is going to punch a hole in the NPT to accommodate India". Deputy chief of mission in Washington Raminder Jassal is reported in the newspaper as saying, "We are aware of our responsibilities and we know the danger of an Iran with nuclear weapons." He further said, "We know how to calibrate our relationship (with Iran) without compromising on essentials."

US point person for the nuclear deal Nicholas Burns in his briefing to American journalists on the 123 agreement had spent considerable time on Iran, in a bid to underplay Delhi’s relations with Iran. The Wall Street Journal, describing his views as a "Burnsian nugget", pointed towards US sanctions against two former chairmen of "India’s state-run Nuclear Power Corporation for allegedly passing nuclear secrets to Tehran".

It also cited sanctions on two Indian companies for "selling Iran percursor chemicals for rocket fuel and chemical weapons" as part of its effort to build a case against the bilateral relations between Iran and India.

Mr Mulford made it very clear over a teleconference that the relations between India and Iran would be "carefully reviewed and scrutinised by members of the Congress as they approach the final vote".

The Hyde Act has set out the parameters that the 123 agreement has not changed as both Mr Burns and Mr Mulford have taken care to point out. Sources here said that the government has gone through the legal formality of seeking the approval of the Cabinet Committee for Security and Cabinet Committee for Political Affairs for the 123 agreement and is not required, technically, to seek the approval of Parliament.

The Bush administration, on the other hand, cannot take a step forward without the approval of the US Congress that has made clear its hyper-sensitivity towards the issues of non proliferation and Iran.

http://www.asianage.com/archive/htmlfiles/India/India under pressure to stop Iran pipeline.html
 
Who says US is not pressuring Pakistan to stop it, they dont want Iran to money from anywhere, wether it is India or China or Pakistan
 
US lost the right to stop IP(I) by signing the nuclear deal with India. Unless they have an alternative to help Pakistan to solve energy crisis, they have no right to interfere.
Pakistan will go ahead with the project, with or without India.
 
US lost the right to stop IP(I) by signing the nuclear deal with India. Unless they have an alternative to help Pakistan to solve energy crisis, they have no right to interfere.
Pakistan will go ahead with the project, with or without India.

US is asking India to stay out, not Pakistan. They have no right to do so but iots not forbidden. Pakistan will still have to negotiate price deals with Iran , which India couldnt finalise. If the deal go ahead with iran then good for Pakistan. But the sad thing is that sooner than later you will find uncle sam sitting on the other side controlling the tap.
 
IPI was a terrible idea for India from the very beginning. An energy life line passing straight through Pakistan. Thank god its dead, otherwise i cannot imagine the amount of black mailing India would have been subjected to.
 
US is asking India to stay out, not Pakistan. They have no right to do so but iots not forbidden. Pakistan will still have to negotiate price deals with Iran , which India couldnt finalise. If the deal go ahead with iran then good for Pakistan. But the sad thing is that sooner than later you will find uncle sam sitting on the other side controlling the tap.

I was replying Adux' post. :angel:
 
There was some crazy whacko idea of exporting the same oil to China via pipeline. Are they still crying about it ? :rolleyes:
 
US is asking India to stay out, not Pakistan. They have no right to do so but iots not forbidden. Pakistan will still have to negotiate price deals with Iran , which India couldnt finalise. If the deal go ahead with iran then good for Pakistan. But the sad thing is that sooner than later you will find uncle sam sitting on the other side controlling the tap.

Actually its of no benefit to Pakistan to negotiate price deal with Iran if India sits out. Pakistan is hoping to make money on transit fees. Gas is abundant in Pakistan for domestic use. Even if Pakistan is a consumer in this case, it is a paltry amount compared to the volume needed for India.

And I am not so sure about uncle sam sitting in Iran that easily. Americans can try the Osirak or a Libya on Iran but there will be no occupation. Mark my words...American public will not support it and American military does not have the fitness to carry this operation out (putting boots on the ground and actually taking over as was done in Iraq).
 
First casualty of American pressure...more to come ;)

Well there were other issues to. iran wanted to renogitiate the price, it didnt agree to India's demand that it will only pay for the 'gas it recieves'.
 
Though Americans have expressed their reservations on this, they have given a nuclear deal to make sure this deal doesnt happen. Why do you think Nuclear deal worked out more or less our favour. Who is the loser? In international politics there are no winners or losers, just compermises.
Iran said it cannot accept the Indian demand of pay for what it recieves. Pakistan cant be trusted, Baloch is a terrible area to go by for the pipeline. Its a pipeline India should have never wanted. Pakistan and India on a such a largescale cooperation is not conducive to Indian interest at this point of time.
 
Pakistan should move on with the project even if india withdraws. India got a very fine deal for her doesnt really now matters for her to stay in the deal but pakistan should. I heard the patroleum minister about saying that we will continue even if india holds back.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom