What's new

US Prepared to Cooperate With India ‘as never before’

India stop acting so coy! Admit that you are loving all the attention.:D

In the end all roads leads to USA.

On a serious note given the right incentive India will dance to our tunes not all that different from when they acquiesced to sanction regime on Iran in exchange for a Nuclear Deal. Wonder what it will take this time

Distrust runs high b/w India and China and all India requires is a little nudge here and there. Day is not far off when Indian Navy will start conducting patrols in cohesion with us. All this despite US-Pakistan relationship on a stronger ground than it has been in years.

US FP is truly a thing to behold! We are managing Arabs and Israel, India and Pakistan, Our influence in Europe and most of Asia is unrivalled. That is indeed a lot of work, I pity the folks in State Dept though - they have even the professional jugglers beat

India and US are natural partners- Let the democratic engagement flourish- We would be great partners- I would suggest avoiding Hawkish ideas like favorable business deals amounting to crony methods, using India against China or any other country, interference into internal matters of India etc-
 
.
India stop acting so coy! Admit that you are loving all the attention.:D

In the end all roads leads to USA.

On a serious note given the right incentive India will dance to our tunes not all that different from when they acquiesced to sanction regime on Iran in exchange for a Nuclear Deal. Wonder what it will take this time

Distrust runs high b/w India and China and all India requires is a little nudge here and there. Day is not far off when Indian Navy will start conducting patrols in cohesion with us. All this despite US-Pakistan relationship on a stronger ground than it has been in years.

US FP is truly a thing to behold! We are managing Arabs and Israel, India and Pakistan, Our influence in Europe and most of Asia is unrivalled. That is indeed a lot of work, I pity the folks in State Dept though - they have even the professional jugglers beat



Source: US Prepared to Cooperate With India ‘as never before’
I disagree with your statement, Accept the attention part.
If America does not smack pakistan on the back of the head and clearly draw the line on terrorism, India will walk away. Remember the dalit diplomat in NY who was strip searched? As far as Delhi is concerned. Russia has given more assurance in regards to Pakistan than washington has ever done. A lot of people in Delhi are not please with Paksitan getting nuclear capable fighters, military aid NOT just economic. Ontop of this, the refusal of washington to let India play a role in Afghanistan even though China, Russia, Iran all want more curry in Afghanistan.
New Delhi is not England or Japan. India is a big boy. And its big boy that has some old friends.
Even if Americans diplomats spew the mantra "past is the past" the past overshadows real strategic deals with India.
Tell me, would the US be willing to sell India its SSNs? or cooperate in the field of SSN development?
 
.
Wonder what it will take this time

USA will have to do what only a superpower can do, in order to appease India.

Last time it was NSG waiver, which only USA could achieve with its influence.

Although I am not having any high hopes with the current Obama Administration for this, despite current India regime is fully open to improvement of India-US ties.

Maybe the coming elections we can have a Republican who may reciprocate.
 
. .
No need for submarine nuclear reactor or F22 ,

F18 with no strings is enough

We are already buying lot of equipments as it is..
 
. .
India stop acting so coy! Admit that you are loving all the attention.:D

In the end all roads leads to USA.

On a serious note given the right incentive India will dance to our tunes not all that different from when they acquiesced to sanction regime on Iran in exchange for a Nuclear Deal. Wonder what it will take this time

Distrust runs high b/w India and China and all India requires is a little nudge here and there. Day is not far off when Indian Navy will start conducting patrols in cohesion with us. All this despite US-Pakistan relationship on a stronger ground than it has been in years.

US FP is truly a thing to behold! We are managing Arabs and Israel, India and Pakistan, Our influence in Europe and most of Asia is unrivalled. That is indeed a lot of work, I pity the folks in State Dept though - they have even the professional jugglers beat
The only incentive than can work is Azad Kashmir margin in to India......

You US do that???
 
. .
Let's have a glance at all the stuff that the India-US deals are likely to yield now & in the foreseeable future.

Air Force
ALREADY ORDERED/DELIVERED
Boeing C-17A Globemaster-III (10)
Lockheed C-130J Super Hercules (6)
Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian (22)
Boeing CH-47F Chinook (15)
General Electric F404 turbofan for Tejas Mk-1
General Electric F414 turbofan for Tejas Mk-2
AGM-84 Harpoon-II ALCMs
CBU-105 sensor-fuzed munitions

FUTURE ORDERS
Lockheed C-130J Super Hercules (6 more); upto 40 or so possible if MTA is cancelled
Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian (upto 60)
Boeing CH-47F Chinook (upto 45)
advanced GE F414 version for AMCA (?)

Navy
ALREADY ORDERED/DELIVERED
Boeing P-8I Neptune (8)
Sikorsky S-70B-2 Sea Hawk (16)
Jalashwa-class LPD (1)
UGM-84 Harpoon-II SLCMs, AGM-84 Harpoon-II ALCMs
General Electric F404 for NLCA Mk-1
General Electric F414 for NLCA Mk-2

FUTURE ORDERS
Boeing P-8I Neptune (upto 26 possible)
Sikorsky S-70B-2 Sea Hawk (upto 48 or more)
Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone (upto 32)
more air-launched Harpoons
advanced GE F414 version for N-AMCA (?)

EMALS for IAC-2 carrier

Army
FUTURE ORDERS
M-777 howitzer (145; upto 500 or so required)
FGM-148 Javelin (40 to 60 thousand rounds; licensed production)
SMAW-2NE (around 40 thousand rounds or more; licensed production)
joint development of next-gen seekers & warheads for above manportable launchers

M-1126 Stryker (around 300 for light-tank requirement;?)

++

Members, please add anything I missed out;
It might seem like much when you first look at it, but compared to the deals with Russia & Israel, it really isn't that high. Ofcourse the defence relationship between India & US today is very valuable (deal prices) and quantifiable compared to only 10 years ago...but if US really wants to challenge Russia as the principle weapons-tech provider, they have a long, long way to go. And their system+congress won't allow them to go halfway.

In short, deals with US will develop at their own pace. There is comparison with Russia size-wise, or even with Israel when it comes to joint-development and technology-sharing.
 
.
Indo-US relations are transforming at a great pace and magnitude due to rise of BJP/Modi government in India.

As of now sources indicate that US is pushing India to procure both F-16s and F/A-18s for ToT on jet engines under the DTTI. For now India seems to be inclined to pick only one (F-16s) and the second one later (for the carrier either F/A-18s or F-35Cs). Let's see how this DTTI deal comes out later this year.

This fall it would be raining (defence deals) in India.

What to Expect from US-India Relations in 2016
U.S.-India ties are heading in the right direction, according to India’s former Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal.

By Kanwal Sibal for The Diplomat
February 09, 2016
Facebook893
Google+1
LinkedIn30
924 Shares
37 Comments
India-U.S. ties have been transformed in recent years, best exemplified with the newly declared global strategic partnership between the two countries. Yet, what is the reality of the partnership in terms of achievements on the ground? And, what could be the future expectations?

For starters, the United States’ Pakistan policy remains a problematic issue. The objective of the two countries to advance regional security together is impeded by the continuation of U.S. military aid to Pakistan. This is done through presidential waivers to overcome the provisions of the Kerry-Lugar legislation, which requires Pakistan to act verifiably against terrorist groups on its soil before U.S. aid can be released.

Furthermore, the United States does not consider the Taliban as a terrorist organization. The U.S. is, in reality, engaged in an effort to accommodate the Taliban politically in Afghanistan in a Pakistan-brokered deal, which is a risk to India’s security. It is thus difficult to see how, in these circumstances, the counter-terrorism partnership between India and the U.S. can be a defining one for the 21st century.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s affirmation in 2010 that “the United States looks forward to a reformed UN Security Council that includes India as a permanent member” was viewed as a major evolution in the U.S. position. Yet up to now, the United States has not clearly defined its position on the expansion of the United Nations Security Council, due to the fact that U.S. openness to India’s hope for permanent membership on the council remains at a declaratory stage.

Similarly, while past joint U.S.-India statements have repeatedly spoken about India’s membership in the four export control regimes, and, India has been declared ready for Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) as well as Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG) membership, so far no tangible progress has occurred. Breakthrough understandings at the governmental level on national tracking and liability issues have removed political roadblocks in the way of civilian nuclear cooperation.

However it is now time for U.S. companies to take the call, as the larger question of the commercial viability of U.S. supplied nuclear reactors remains. With India ratifying the Convention on Supplementary Compensation, an international nuclear liability regime governed by the International Atomic Energy Agency, it appears that the decks have been cleared for progress within a year on the project to supply six Westinghouse nuclear reactors to India. Nevertheless General Electric, another supplier, continues to hold out. Without a strong U.S. leadership role, progress is unlikely to come soon.

In the past, the United States had virtually no defense ties with India. Today, apart from a renewed Defense Framework Agreement, the U.S. has become a large supplier of defense equipment to India, and even the biggest in the last few years, with contracts worth almost $13 billion. In addition, the largest number Indian joint military exercises are with the United States.

Robust language has appeared in joint India-U.S. statements in 2013, 2014, and 2015 on defense cooperation. However, so far, less than expected progress has been made in the area of defense manufacturing under the so-called Defense Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI). During Obama’s visit to India, four “pathfinder” projects under the DTTI rubric involving relatively minor technologies were announced. Contacts between the two sides under this U.S. initiative continue. Two other projects of note, one on aircraft carrier technology and the other on jet engine technology, are also under discussion.

U.S.-China tensions are growing, and, India too has longstanding disputes with China. The 2015 U.S.-India Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region specifically addresses maritime territorial disputes involving China and, among other things, affirmed the importance of safeguarding maritime security and ensuring freedom of navigation and freedom of the air throughout the region, especially in the South China Sea.

U.S. trade and financial relations with China are vast; India too seeks stable and economically productive ties with China. India has the difficult task ahead of managing the China threat by both engaging closely with the United States and reaching out to China. At the same time, the credibility of the U.S. rebalance to Asia and the Pacific is yet to be tested.

As part of closer India-U.S. understandings on the Indo-Pacific region, India and the United States have decided to include Japan in the bilateral India-U.S. Malabar naval exercises. The trilateral India-U.S.-Japan political dialogue has also been raised from the official to Ministerial level.

However, India’s problems with China are principally related to ongoing border disputes arising from a boundary disagreement and Beijing’s deepening relationship with Islamabad. In both cases, India cannot count on the United State to take a position supportive of India. This points to the limits of the strategic partnership, as such a partnership falls short of supporting India’s territorial sovereignty.

When it comes to deepening bilateral economic relations between the two countries, progress has been mixed. For one thing, U.S. businesses remain reluctant to invest in India because of their beliefs that the Indian government has not yet delivered on promises to ease doing business in India including taxation issues, and implement general economic reforms in the country.

Nevertheless, the IT sector has brought the knowledge economies of India and the United States closer together and it constitutes the strongest link Washington has with the drivers of India’s modernization and innovation. However, the United States is unfortunately targeting this sector with higher visa costs and increased restrictions.

What is the way forward when it comes to bilateral economic relations?

Among other things, the India-U.S. collaborative economic agenda should include co-production and co-development of defense products under the Make in India program, coal gasification technologies, and the issuance of a non-FTA country waiver in order for India to gain access to U.S. fossil fuel reserves.

The bilateral economic agenda should also extend to partnerships in the area of agricultural technology, the civil aviation sector, life sciences, infrastructure financing, and green financing, among others. Bilateral dialogues should also address visa issues in the IT/ITES (i.e. outsourcing services) sectors, focus on exporting synergies in the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors, and find means to support university and other skill development exchanges.

The India-U.S. relationship is being increasingly consolidated. However, like in any such relationship — especially between the world’s foremost political, military, economic and technological power and a large developing country advanced in certain sectors of the knowledge economy, but beset with serious problems of poverty as well as at unequal stages of development internally — differences are normal.

Much work lies ahead to make the India-U.S. relationship a “defining one” in the 21st century, but we are headed in the right direction.

Dr. Kanwal Sibal joined the Indian Foreign Service in July 1966, eventually serving as the Foreign Secretary of India from July 2002 to November 2003. Dr. Sibal served as Ambassador of India to Egypt, France, and Turkey. This article has previously been published on the EastWest Institute Policy Innovation Blog.

What to Expect from US-India Relations in 2016 | The Diplomat
 
. . .
I don't know but I assume the article is correct. Although I don't doubt that America wishes better relations with India, our historic regional ally has always been Pakistan. I discount China as being a major factor in the equation. Here on PDF, China-American conflict is far more pronounced than the reality. The US may have conflicts with China but we still have a much more intertwined and mutually beneficial relationship with China, than we do with Russia for example, which has been India's historic ally.
 
.

C-17 have also been done with and ceased production as of 2015.

As I wrote on other thread regarding Indian C-17 order. The best bet would be to acquire surplus C-17 (If the USAF offered any), all the C-17 in US service are currently active deployed, so at this moment the number of surplus C-17 is 0

Another way I can see is for India to order enough or drastic number to pop up the production line, there would also be an outside chance that they will move the production line to India if that is the case
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom