What's new

US Politics

We have survived 100-days of Trump. The sky has not fallen as Democrats claimed it would. Trump thought he could do what he wanted, but has been checked by both Congress and the courts.

I think the US system of government is actually working!
 
.

Illegal immigration down more than 50% (higher depending how you measure it).

Constitutionalist judge gets into supreme court.

Education turning into pro-voucher + pro-decentralisation.

Business optimism at 12 year high. Small business optimism at 43 year high.

It is how they will now translate on the ground that matters the most compared to arbitrary allocation of time to judge (100 days).

Trump took a extreme position initially (esp in foreign policy) so negotiation and compromise is more favourable (like how he has got other NATO countries to cough up their fair share over time and got China to keep tighter leash on fat kim, and same concerning Russia with Assad). If you start out politically correct, you turn into another DC swamper like obama over time....everyone effectively ends up walking all over you in the end and at best its status quo.

Obama's idea that democracy would work in the middle east magically is one such result of it. Trump on the other hand is getting along with Sisi and the host of M.E monarchs as necessary pragmatic people to establish stability, law and order in their countries....but not beyond administering a focused slap when they go overboard like with Assad.
 
.
We have survived 100-days of Trump. The sky has not fallen as Democrats claimed it would. Trump thought he could do what he wanted, but has been checked by both Congress and the courts.

I think the US system of government is actually working!
The system never failed. I lived before the Internet, basically, prehistoric to you kids. There was an article -- on printed paper -- that essentially said of all the types of leaders in modern times, the US President is the least powerful. Of all the office's duties and responsibilities, only foreign affairs is the US President comparable to other types.
 
. .
A disgusting abuse of power today by Trump. His firing of Comey is up there with Nixon firing Archibald Cox in the Watergate Scandal.

I hope Congress and the intel community fight this doofus to the very end.
 
.
A disgusting abuse of power today by Trump. His firing of Comey is up there with Nixon firing Archibald Cox in the Watergate Scandal.

I hope Congress and the intel community fight this doofus to the very end.

You realise the recommendation for his firing came from the deputy AG (Rosenstein) who was served as maryland attorney under the obama administration and passed in the senate by 94 - 6?

Stop grabbing on to everything CNN hollers as the verbatim truth.

Just listen to what pretty much every former AG and deputy AG have said regarding Comey (including Eric Holder) thus far if you don't believe me.

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/d...s-from-the-white-house-attorney-general/2430/

Worth reading:

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...od-rosenstein-memo-gives-bipartisan-rationale
 
.
A disgusting abuse of power today by Trump. His firing of Comey is up there with Nixon firing Archibald Cox in the Watergate Scandal.


Not quite as bad as Nixon. But pretty bad, nonetheless. Even members of his own party are criticizing him.

I hope Congress and the intel community fight this doofus to the very end.


Agreed.

At the end of the day, however, Trump is his own worst enemy. He briefly righted the ship with his actions regarding Flynn/Russia, Assad/Syria, and China. But he inevitably reverted to making mistakes again, and will continue to do so, as he has demonstrated thus far.

@RabzonKhan, @cloud4000, @anon45, @AMDR --- Your thoughts?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reactions to Trump firing James Comey

Carolyn Kaster / AP

President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey suddenly on Tuesday evening, noting that his decision came on the recommendations of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and deputy AG Rod Rosenstein. The reactions:

  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Trump's firings of Sally Yates, Preet Bharara, and James Comey: "This does not seem to be a coincidence."
  • Edward Snowden: "Set aside politics: every American should condemn such political interference in the Bureau's work. This FBI Director has sought for years to jail me on account of my political activities. If I can oppose his firing, so can you."
  • Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA): Comey firing "disturbingly reminiscent of the Saturday Night Massacre during the Watergate scandal &the natl turmoil that it caused."
Keep reading ... words
  • ACLU: "The independence of the FBI director is meant to ensure that the president does not operate above the law. For President Trump to fire the man responsible for investigating his own campaign's ties to the Russians imperils that fundamental principle."
  • Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI): My staff and I are reviewing legislation to establish an independent commission on Russia. The second paragraph of this letter is bizarre.
  • Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), Intel committee chairman: "I am troubled by the timing and reasoning of Director Comey's termination."
  • Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ): "I've spent the last several hours trying to find an acceptable rationale for the timing of Comey's firing. I just can't do it."
  • Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA): "The FBI Director serves at the pleasure of the president. Under these circumstances, president Trump accepted the recommendation of the Justice Department that the Director lacked the confidence needed to carry out his important duties."
  • Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): "I am disappointed in the President's decision to remove James Comey from office. James Comey is a man of honor and integrity, and he has led the FBI well in extraordinary circumstances."
  • Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), ranking member on House Oversight committee: The firing "harkens back to a similarly tainted decision by President Nixon."
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA): "But does anyone seriously believe @realDonaldTrump fired the top person investigating his ties to Russia because he was unfair to Hillary?"
  • Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA): "Trump firing Comey shows how frightened the Admin is over Russia investigation."
  • Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA): "This is Nixonian." Called for immediate appointment of special counsel on Trump/Russia.
  • Fox News' Sean Hannity: "Comey Fired!!! Finally."
  • Brian Fallon, national press secretary for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign: "I'm not shedding any tears for Comey personally -he hurt FBI's reputation- but I do worry whether we ever get to the bottom of Russia now."
  • DNC Chair Tom Perez: "Trump fired the man investigating him — a deeply dangerous abuse of power. We need a special prosecutor, now."
  • Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD): Calls for emergency hearings, says it's "mind boggling" that Sessions "was directly involved" in call to fire.
  • Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA): "Time to revive Watergate vocabulary: obstruction, cover-up, suborn, conspiracy, inoperative, criminal conspiracy, independent prosecutor."
https://www.axios.com/reactions-to-trump-firing-james-comey-live-updates-2400475532.html
 
.
Worth revisiting what Eric Holder wrote in 2016:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...3a007c77bb4_story.html?utm_term=.63d71ed8026a

Especially important excerpt:

The department has a practice of not commenting on ongoing investigations. Indeed, except in exceptional circumstances, the department will not even acknowledge the existence of an investigation. The department also has a policy of not taking unnecessary action close in time to Election Day that might influence an election’s outcome. These rules have been followed during Republican and Democratic administrations. They aren’t designed to help any particular individual or to serve any political interest. Instead, they are intended to ensure that every investigation proceeds fairly and judiciously; to maintain the public trust in the department’s ability to do its job free of political influence; and to prevent investigations from unfairly or unintentionally casting public suspicion on public officials who have done nothing wrong.

Director Comey broke with these fundamental principles. I fear he has unintentionally and negatively affected public trust in both the Justice Department and the FBI. And he has allowed — again without improper motive — misinformation to be spread by partisans with less pure intentions. Already, we have learned that the importance of the discovery itself may have been overblown. According to the director himself, there is no indication yet that the “newly discovered” emails bear any significance at all. And yet, because of his decision to comment on this development before sufficient facts were known, the public has faced a torrent of conspiracy theories and misrepresentations.

This controversy has its roots in the director’s July decision to hold a news conference announcing his recommendation that the Justice Department bring no charges against Hillary Clinton. Instead of making a private recommendation to the attorney general — consistent with Justice Department policy — he chose to publicly share his professional recommendation, as well as his personal opinions, about the case. That was a stunning breach of protocol. It may set a dangerous precedent for future investigations. It was wrong.

The director said in July that he chose to take that extraordinary step in response to intense public interest. During my 12-year service in the Public Integrity Section and as attorney general, I worked on some of the most politically sensitive cases that our country saw. The additional public scrutiny such investigations provoke makes it even more important that we handle those cases consistently and responsibly. That is exactly why guidelines are put in place: so that Justice Department leaders, including FBI directors, will not substitute their own judgments and opinions for reasoned, fair, coherent and time-tested policy.

I am mindful of the unique facts that surrounded the July decision. The airplane meeting between the attorney general and former President Bill Clinton led to the perception among some that inappropriate communications occurred. Perceptions matter. But the solution was not for the FBI director to announce the department’s decision about whether to proceed. That determination — and how or whether it should have been be publicly revealed — rested with department lawyers, after consultation with FBI counterparts.

If the attorney general determined that she could not participate in the process, the deputy attorney general, Sally Yates, a respected, apolitical, career prosecutor, should have stood in her place. Any comments should have come from the attorney general or deputy attorney general, the people who always communicate prosecutorial decisions made by the department. And let me be clear: Far less than that which was shared in the July news conference, and afterward, should have been revealed.
 
.
Grand jury subpoenas issued in FBI's Russia investigation

Federal prosecutors have issued grand jury subpoenas to associates of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn seeking business records, as part of the ongoing probe of Russian meddling in last year's election, according to people familiar with the matter. CNN learned of the subpoenas hours before President Donald Trump fired FBI director James Comey.

The subpoenas represent the first sign of a significant escalation of activity in the FBI's broader investigation begun last July into possible ties between Trump campaign associates and Russia.

The subpoenas issued in recent weeks by the US Attorney's Office in Alexandria, Virginia, were received by associates who worked with Flynn on contracts after he was forced out as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014, according to the people familiar with the investigation.

Robert Kelner, an attorney for Flynn, declined to comment. The US Attorney's Office in Alexandria, the Justice Department and the FBI also declined to comment.

Investigators have been looking into possible wrongdoing in how Flynn handled disclosures about payments from clients tied to foreign governments including Russia and Turkey, US officials briefed on the matter have told CNN.

The Flynn inquiry is one piece of the broader investigation, which FBI Director James Comey testified in a Senate hearing last week is led jointly by the Alexandria US Attorney's Office and the Justice Department's National Security Division.

Flynn was forced to resign as Trump's national security advisor in February after failing to disclose the nature of phone discussions with Russia's ambassador in Washington, Sergey Kislyak.

Congressional investigators have also accused Flynn of possibly breaking the law by not properly disclosing a $45,000 payment for an appearance he made at an event in Moscow to celebrate Russia Today. The Russian government-funded news outlet that US intelligence agencies say played a key role in disseminating stolen emails intended to damage the candidacy of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

lynn's lawyer, Robert Kelner, has said that Flynn was not hiding anything, noting that he briefed the DIA on his trip to Russia.

"As has previously been reported, General Flynn briefed the Defense Intelligence Agency, a component agency of DoD, extensively regarding the RT speaking event trip both before and after the trip, and he answered any questions that were posed by DIA concerning the trip during those briefings," Kelner said in a statement.

In March, Flynn's lobbying firm registered as a foreign agent for the Turkish government, under a $500,000 contract.

Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, emerged in 2015 as a strident critic of the Obama administration, which fired him. He built a close relationship last year with then-candidate Trump and became a frequent Trump campaign surrogate before assuming a brief tenure as national security advisor.

US Attorney Dana Boente, whose office issued the subpoenas, is also leading the investigation into WikiLeaks and the effort to bring possible charges against the group's founder, Julian Assange. Boente is also acting as head of the Justice Department's national security section.

The FBI interviewed Flynn about the December calls with Kislyak and determined that he wasn't intentionally trying to be deceptive about the nature of what was discussed, according to US officials briefed on the investigation. But investigators have been investigating Flynn's business ties after he left the government and before he joined the Trump administration.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/politics/grand-jury-fbi-russia/index.html

Looks like Flynn may be the first traitor to fall.
 
. .
Looks like Flynn may be the first traitor to fall.

Keep dreaming. The first real traitors dug out will probably be those that unmasked Flynn's name and then leaked that to the press (highly illegal....and Comey not posing one question about that to Sally Yates as she testified in the hearing is a real clincher as far as his incompetency is concerned...whether it had intent or not).

There are some real nice pressure points for the Trump administration to work with now....with Comey out of the way.
Susan Rice and McCabe are looking especially juicy....though there's plenty more from where that came from (draining the swamp and all). Susan Rice I am sure you are familiar with already. Here is more on deputy (and now acting) FBI director McCabe:

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/judiciary/upload/2017-03-28 CEG to FBI (McCabe Conflict in Trump Associates Investigation).pdf

Let's see what political shenanigans that exposes down the road. One thing's clear, the next FBI director has to be a competent, independent non-political leader to purge the political hue (somewhat inevitably) found in the higher echelons and reduce the dissonance with the FBI rank and file.

Its funny why people cry "why now"? regarding Comey....Trump needed and secured his 3rd and final confirmation from Comey that he was not being investigated, and also needed to wait for bipartisan Dep AG Rosenstein (confirmed April 24th - just two weeks ago) to get in to move with the final paperwork (given AG Sessions recused himself from the Russia-investigation)...and also give more time to Comey to provide his own rope for what happened today...without making it seem like some personal retribution after Jan 20th.

Btw the MSM may have made up its mind (just like when they leaked debate questions to Hillary) on the whole Russia-Trump thing, but in reality we are all still waiting for the evidence:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452
 
.
At the end of the day, however, Trump is his own worst enemy. He briefly righted the ship with his actions regarding Flynn/Russia, Assad/Syria, and China. But he inevitably reverted to making mistakes again, and will continue to do so, as he has demonstrated thus far.

This looks like something Steve Bannon would advise Trump to do. Nevertheless, the firing of Comey seems out of place. If Trump is trying to derail FBI's investigation into Russia tampering with US elections, this is no way to go about it. In fact, the opposite will happen now, the focus will intensify further. Not even Congress can stand still on this issue. And Trump has few friends in Congress even among the GOP.

A bad, impulsive move committed by a POTUS who's known to be impulsive.
 
.
Behind Comey's firing: An enraged Trump, fuming about Russia


President Donald Trump weighed firing his FBI director for more than a week. When he finally pulled the trigger Tuesday afternoon, he didn't call James Comey. He sent his longtime private security guard to deliver the termination letter in a manila folder to FBI headquarters.

He had grown enraged by the Russia investigation, two advisers said, frustrated by his inability to control the mushrooming narrative around Russia. He repeatedly asked aides why the Russia investigation wouldn’t disappear and demanded they speak out for him. He would sometimes scream at television clips about the probe, one adviser said.

Trump's firing of the high-profile FBI director on the 110th day since the president took office marked another sudden turn for an administration that has fired its acting attorney general, national security adviser and now its FBI director, whom Trump had praised until recent weeks and had even blew a kiss to during a January appearance.

The news stunned Comey, who saw news of his dismissal on TV while speaking inside the FBI office in Los Angeles. It startled all but the uppermost ring of White House advisers, who said grumbling about Comey hadn't dominated their own morning senior staff meetings. Other top officials learned just before it happened and were unaware Trump was considering firing Comey. "Nobody really knew," one senior White House official said. "Our phones all buzzed and people said, 'What?'"

By ousting the FBI director investigating his campaign and associates, Trump may have added more fuel to the fire he is furiously trying to contain — and he was quickly criticized by a chorus of Republicans and Democrats. "The timing of this firing was very troubling," said Sen. Ben Sasse, a Nebraska Republican.

Trump had grown angry with the Russia investigation — particularly Comey admitting in front of the Senate that the FBI was investigating his campaign — and that the FBI director wouldn't support his claims that President Barack Obama had tapped his phones in Trump Tower.

Bipartisan criticism of Comey had mounted since last summer after the director delivered lengthy statement outlining why no charges would be brought against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server.

But the fallout seemed to take the White House by surprise. Trump made a round of calls around 5 p.m., asking for support from senators. White House officials believed it would be a "win-win" because Republicans and Democrats alike have problems with the FBI director, one person briefed on their deliberations said.

Instead, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told him he was making a big mistake — and Trump seemed "taken aback," according to a person familiar with the call.

By Tuesday evening, the president was watching the coverage of his decision and frustrated no one was on TV defending him, a White House official said. He wanted surrogates out there beating the drum.

Instead, advisers were attacking one anotherr for not realizing the gravity of the situation as events blew up. "How are you not defending your position for three solid hours on TV?" the White House aide asked.

Two White House officials said there was little communications strategy in handling the firing, and that staffers were given talking points late Tuesday for hastily arranged media appearances. Aides soon circulated previous quotes from Schumer hitting Comey. After Schumer called for a special prosecutor, the White House huddled in press secretary Sean Spicer's office to devise a strategy and sent "fresh faces" to TV, one White House official said.

By Tuesday night, aides were using TV appearances to spin the firing as a simple bureaucratic matter and call for an end to the investigation. "It's time to move on," Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the deputy press secretary, said on Fox News.

In his letter dismissing Comey, Trump said the FBI director had given him three private assurances that he wasn't under investigation. The White House declined to say when those conversations happened — or why Comey would volunteer such information. It is not the first time Trump has publicly commented on an ongoing investigation — typically a no-no for presidents. He said earlier this month that Comey had done Clinton a favor by letting her off easy.

Trump received letters from Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, and Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, calling for Comey's dismissal, on Tuesday, a spokesman said. The president then decided to fire the FBI director based on the recommendations and moved quickly. The spokesman said Trump did not ask for the letters in advance, and that White House officials had no idea they were coming.

But several other people familiar with the events said Trump had talked about the firing for more than a week, and the letters were written to give him rationale to fire Comey.

The decision marked a turnabout for Trump. On the campaign trail, the candidate led chants of "Lock her up!" and praised Comey’s “guts” in October for reopening the probe into her email server. He joked openly with Comey at the White House two days after the inauguration.

Trump, as one White House official noted, believed Comey was too soft on Clinton — not too unfair, as Rosenstein’s letter Tuesday indicated.

At FBI headquarters, one senior official said the bureau was essentially in lockdown, not answering calls flooding in and referring all questions to the Justice Department. "I got nothing for you. Sorry," said the official. "We were caught totally off guard. But we are not commenting in any kind of way, and referring calls to DOJ."

Comey had flown on an FBI plane to Los Angeles for a "diversity and recruiting" event. Trump’s director of Oval Office operations, longtime security aide Keith Schiller, hand-delivered the dismissal letter to FBI headquarters.

By Tuesday evening, the shock that had spread throughout the ranks of current and former FBI officials was mixed with a growing sense of anger among the many Comey loyalists, and demands for answers as to why the director had been fired — and why now.

“We just have no idea why this happened. No idea,” said one recently retired top FBI official who worked closely with Comey on many high-profile investigations. “No one knew this was coming. Everyone is just shocked that this happened.”

There was no immediate front-runner for the job, one White House official said. "If there's a list, I haven't seen it," said one senior White House official.

While shock dominated much of the FBI and the White House, the mood was more elated at Roger Stone's house in Florida. Several Stone allies and friends said Stone, who has been frequently mentioned in the investigation, encouraged the president to fire Comey in conversations in recent weeks.

On Twitter, Stone signaled praise for the move by posting an image of Trump from The Apprentice saying, "You're fired."

Stone declined to comment Tuesday night but said he was enjoying a fine cigar.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/10/comey-firing-trump-russia-238192

Further proof we have a mental midget running the show.
 
.
A bad, impulsive move committed by a POTUS who's known to be impulsive.

It was not at Trump's instigation. That came from the bipartisan Rosenstein (Deputy AG) and plenty of bipartisan names have thoroughly criticized Comey acting way past the purview of FBI director. Just read my previous posts here.
 
.
It was not at Trump's instigation. That came from the bipartisan Rosenstein (Deputy AG) and plenty of bipartisan names have thoroughly criticized Comey acting way past the purview of FBI director. Just read my previous posts here.

Who instigated it, be it the Deputy AG or Democrats, but it was ultimately Trump's decision. If Trump wanted Comey gone he should have asked for his resignation (not fire) at the start of his presidency, not three months later, in midst of investigating Russian interference in US elections.

Trump is well within his rights to fire Comey, but the timing was horrible and will have to suffer the consequences for it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom