What's new

US Politics






Haters, get over it: Hillary Clinton isn't going to jail over emails, Benghazi

By Dahleen Glanton Chicago Tribune 7/6/2016

On the heels of Independence Day, the FBI gave America a belated 240th birthday present: Hillary Clinton won't be going to prison over Emailgate.

Haters, get over it.

The anti-Hillary crowd has been poking us with that stick during her entire presidential campaign, casting doubt on her viability, planting innuendo about her character and working nonstop to make us think that they somehow knew something the rest of us didn't.

Tuesday, investigators announced that Clinton did nothing criminally wrong by using her personal email account while handling classified information as secretary of state. It removed a potentially damaging legal barrier from the campaign trail and cleared a pile of rubbish from her path to the White House. And it happened just in the nick of time.

Think of it this way: A President Hillary Clinton is the only thing standing in the way of a President Donald Trump. Read more
 
.
Battle for White House

hillary-clinton-donald-trump-400x224.jpg


Hillary has a significant electoral advantage over Trump, based on previous election results, polling and demographics.

Here is the electoral map:


210 Clinton---------------------Toss Ups 164-------------------------Trump 164

270 Electoral Votes Needed To Win

RealClearPoliticsECMap20160603.png
 
Last edited:
.
Poll: Majority wanted Hillary indicted
19 Power Line by Paul Mirengoff

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/07/poll-majority-wanted-hillary-indicted.php

A Rasmussen poll finds that most voters disagree with FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to seek a criminal indictment of Hillary Clinton. The poll, taken the night Comey announced the decision, finds that 37 percent of likely voters agree with the FBI’s decision, but 54 percent disagree and believe the FBI should have sought a criminal indictment.

I confess to being surprised by this result. I expected the split to be closer to 50-50.

Naturally most Democrats agree with the decision. However, fully one-quarter of Dems disagree.

Among Republicans the sentiment is clear enough. 79 percent believe Hillary should have been indicted. They are joined by 63 percent of voters not affiliated with either major political party.

The pro-indictment sentiment may be fueled to some extent by the sense that powerful people get preferential treatment when they break the law. 81 percent of those surveyed believe this to be the case. Only 10 percent disagree.

Given these numbers, Donald Trump’s takeaway from Comey’s decision — that the system is rigged — should resonate.
 
. .
Trump effect: Apple, Microsoft, HP among companies shunning Republican convention

SAN FRANCISCO: Donald Trump has promised to liven up this year's Republican National Convention. But some of America's biggest corporations are bailing on the party.

Apple recently became the latest company to give the GOP's presumptive nominee the cold shoulder; it won't contribute money or products to the Republicans' big shindig in Cleveland this month.

HP Inc is also withholding support, while Microsoft is giving products only, not cash. Beyond the tech industry, Ford, JPMorgan Chase and United Parcel Service have opted to withhold support.

Most of these companies are also taking a pass on donating to the 2016 Democratic convention. In previous election cycles, though, several of them have given Republican organisers more sometimes far more in cash or donated products than they have the Democrats, making their pullback from the Republican gathering this year more dramatic.

The reasons aren't completely clear. None of these companies publicly described its decisions as a repudiation of Trump . Several declined to discuss their thinking, while others said their sponsorship plans were decided months before Trump emerged as the front-runner for the GOP nomination.


Master.jpg

An anti-Trump protester holds protest sign in Cleveland. (Reuters photo)
In many cases, however, their decisions became known after civil rights groups launched a public effort including billboards, letters and online messages aimed at persuading companies to withhold support for an event celebrating a candidate who's campaigned with incendiary proposals, racial rhetoric and harsh comments about immigrants and women.

"Of course it's because of Trump ," said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist who has studied party conventions for more than 30 years. Business executives, he said, don't want to alienate customers who may be offended by Trump's statements. "Just as candidates don't get votes from people they insult," he said, "corporations don't get business from people they insult."

Even so, Republican convention organisers say their fundraising is going well. More than 100 donors have contributed a total of US $57.5 million, or about 90 per cent of what's needed, said Emily Lauer of the Cleveland 2016 Host Committee. She declined to provide a list of sponsors. Trump's campaign did not respond to requests for comment.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...epublican-convention/articleshow/53128877.cms
 
.
Hillary Clinton And Democrats Open Massive Lead Over Trump And GOP In New Poll

By Jason Easley on Fri, Jul 8th, 2016 at 1:25 pm

Hillary Clinton’s big lead over Donald Trump continues to grow, while Trump is starting to hurt Congressional Republicans as Democrats have expanded their lead with voters on the generic Congressional ballot.

The latest poll from Democracy Corps revealed:

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 11 points in Democracy Corps’ most recent national survey (48 percent to 37 percent, with 8 percent voting for Libertarian Gary Johnson). This survey of 900 likely 2016 voters was conducted June 23-28th with 66 percent of respondents reached on cell phones.

Importantly, this is the first time that we have seen the presidential vote margin for Democrats exceed the Democrats’ party identification advantage: in this case, Democrats hold a 6-point advantage in party identification and an 8-point advantage with Republican and Democratic leaning-independents.

This poll also shows Democrats making gains down-ballot. In a named congressional ballot, Democratic congressional candidates have opened an 8-point lead over Republican congressional candidates (49 to 41 percent). This is up from a 6-point advantage over the Republican candidates in March polling, and the greatest margin for congressional Democrats that we have measured since June 2009 in our polling. This is also the same margin achieved during the wave elections of 2006 and 2008.


It is only July, but the poll offers a strong hint that there is a Democratic wave building for November. If Democrats keep or expand on their generic Congressional ballot lead, the unthinkable could occur, as the House Republican majority will be in jeopardy.

The efforts by Republicans to isolate Trump and prevent his plague of bad poll numbers from spreading down the ballot appear to be failing. The proof will come when more endangered incumbent Republican members of Congress run away from Trump.

The current Republican plan appears to be to ignore Trump and pretend like the presidential contest exists on another planet.

If the numbers continue to worsen, Republicans should be expected to overtly run away from Trump in a desperate attempt to save their own skins. Running way from the top of your own ticket never works, but Donald Trump is threatening to sink the entire Republican Party.

Democrats should be even more motivated to push harder to finish the job. Winning back the House is still a long shot that will take lots of effort, but thanks to Donald Trump, Democratic voters may have a chance in November to keep the White House, take back the Senate, and throw the extremists out of the House.

An election that was already going well could get even better for the Democratic Party by Election Day.
 
. .
CWA Endorses Hillary Clinton for President

July 11, 2016

Washington, D.C. -- The Communications Workers of America whole-heartedly endorses Secretary Hillary Clinton for President of the United States.

We know that elections are about choices. The contrast between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, couldn’t be greater.

Hillary Clinton has stood with CWA members and pledges her commitment to making life better for working families. She’s walked with us on the Verizon picket line. She supports the call to get big money out of politics. She is committed to ending special treatment for Wall Street and the 1 percent. She wants to help students end the cycle of education debt. She has a solid record on the issues that are critical for working families: bargaining rights and the right to organize; family and medical leave; closing tax loopholes that benefit the 1 percent at the expense of our communities; secure health care and retirement benefits, and equal pay legislation. She has reaffirmed her opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, now and in a possible lame-duck session of Congress.

Donald Trump also has been telling us exactly what he would do. He supports “right to work” laws that weaken workers’ bargaining rights. He thinks the minimum wage is too high and that workers who want good jobs should accept lower wages. He dismisses the need for equal pay for women. He talks a good game about bad trade deals but manufactures his fancy ties offshore.

Hillary Clinton is thoughtful and experienced. Donald Trump is reckless, unthinking and much more likely to cut a deal with his billionaire colleagues than look out for working families.

In a Donald Trump administration, we’d be watching our backs for four years. We’d have no opportunity to move forward on real gains for working families, instead, we’d be forced on defense, just to defend the jobs and gains we’ve made over the years. With Hillary Clinton as president, we will have the ability and opportunity to push forward on our agenda to build a just, democratic society for working families.

The choice is clear. CWA will do everything we can to mobilize our members and activists to elect Hillary Clinton President of the United States.

The largest number of CWA members and retirees are in California, Texas, New York, New Jersey, and Ohio. Activists will be engaged in worksite actions, staffing phone banks, neighborhood walks, and other support.

 
.
Bernie Sanders Finally Did It

He endorses Hillary Clinton
bernie-hrc-upload.jpg


PORTSMOUTH, New Hampshire (CNN) —Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders formally endorsed presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton at a rally in New Hampshire Tuesday, ending their political rivalry.

Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, hopes to rev up voters on the left with help from Sanders, the 74-year-old self-described democratic socialist who excited the liberal base and won young voters by large margins during the primary.

The joint rally here in Portsmouth will begin putting to rest Democratic fears of a political nightmare scenario: that Sanders might sit on his hands in the general election -- or worse, run as a third-party candidate on the left.

Clinton aides are confident that Sanders could be the former secretary of state's potent weapon against Trump. Read more


 
. . .
https://www.rt.com/usa/350829-bernie-sellout-sanders-reaction/

'Bernie is a sellout': Sanders supporters blast him for endorsing Hillary Clinton

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...f-of-sanders-supporters-won-t-support-clinton

Nearly Half of Sanders Supporters Won’t Support Clinton: Poll

LOL those diehards were very likely independent before this, so no big loss. Certainly no one can call themself a Progressive who supported Bernie with a straight face and still vote for Trump.

Bernie is doing what he always said he would do, he made no secret that he would support Hillary if she won the nomination. People who thought he was going to run 3rd party or, seriously, support Trump, were delusional.

His endorsement was also quite passionate, not tepid like some were hoping.

Trump is everything Bernie stands against, Hillary's positions are relatively close to Bernie's ideals, and he did move the party platform left to a good degree.

Perhaps those those people claiming 'Bernie is a sellout' should have actually listened to what he said the whole time, instead of what they wanted him to say.

Anyways, with the A-list Dem names behind Clinton she has a formidable campaigning team.


Meanwhile A-list Republicans are either very tepid in their support or don't support Trump at all. Plus he is his own worst enemy.


He's going to get creamed, and Republican down tickets are probably going to get creamed along with him.

This might make the Republicans seriously consider their own super delegate system if the loss is to McGovern levels..
 
. . .
You need to update yourself, buddy, that was an old poll (June 14).


The ABC/WaPo poll(June 26)-81% of Bernie supporters are backing Hillary and only 8% support Trump. Link


Public Policy Polling (PPP) (June 30) 79% are voting for Hillary to 7% for Trump. Link


And in the most recent, Pew research Center (July 7) 85% of Bernie supporters intend to vote for Clinton and 9% support Trump. Link

Now that Bernie has endorsed Hillary, I’m hoping, more of his supporters will back Hillary.

LOL those diehards were very likely independent before this, so no big loss. Certainly no one can call themself a Progressive who supported Bernie with a straight face and still vote for Trump.

Bernie is doing what he always said he would do, he made no secret that he would support Hillary if she won the nomination. People who thought he was going to run 3rd party or, seriously, support Trump, were delusional.

His endorsement was also quite passionate, not tepid like some were hoping.

Trump is everything Bernie stands against, Hillary's positions are relatively close to Bernie's ideals, and he did move the party platform left to a good degree.

Perhaps those those people claiming 'Bernie is a sellout' should have actually listened to what he said the whole time, instead of what they wanted him to say.

Anyways, with the A-list Dem names behind Clinton she has a formidable campaigning team.


Meanwhile A-list Republicans are either very tepid in their support or don't support Trump at all. Plus he is his own worst enemy.


He's going to get creamed, and Republican down tickets are probably going to get creamed along with him.

This might make the Republicans seriously consider their own super delegate system if the loss is to McGovern levels..
I’m a strong supporter of superdelegates, imagine, if the Republican party had superdelegates, it would have been impossible for Trump to hijack their party.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom