US Politics

[Hamartia Antidote]

Does anyone else find it strange that all of the countries that are funding global terrorist organizations (ISIS) have endorsed Hillary Clinton? @C130 @XenoEnsi-14 @Hamartia Antidote

Well not sure if they are endorsing Hillary or simply shunning Trump.

 

[Desert Fox]

Hillary’s Latest Scandal: She And Bill Siphoned $100 Mil From Mideast Leaders

​

Scandal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders. Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly function as our nation’s leader?

The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has uncovered a disturbing pattern of the Clintons’ raising money for the Clinton Foundation from regimes that have checkered records on human rights and that aren’t always operating in the best interests of the U.S. By the way, the $100 million we mentioned above doesn’t appear to include another $30 million given to the Clintons by two Mideast-based foundations and four billionaire Saudis.

All told, it’s a lot of money.

“These regimes are buying access,” Patrick Poole, a national security analyst who regularly writes for PJ Media, told the DCNF. “You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension.”

Well, maybe not, given that Clinton, during her four-year tenure as secretary of state, used a clearly illegal private email server which is now under investigation by the FBI. Her open e-mail system likely was hacked by Chinese, Russian and perhaps other spy agencies, say cyberespionage experts. Such negligence would seem to disqualify her from ever holding a sensitive foreign policy post in the government again.

Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly more serious investigation into possible political corruption involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive, given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way that lines their own pockets.

The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton’s business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took away some $15 million in “guaranteed payments” from the deal, his tax records show.

A picture of extraordinary greed is emerging from both Clintons in the years after they hold the highest posts in the U.S. government.

In just the past three years, after her stint as the nation’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton spoke to dozens of deep-pocket firms on Wall Street, typically charging $250,000 a pop to hear her wit and wisdom — despite her bitter condemnations of Wall Street during her campaign.

All told, she took in an estimated $22 million from these speeches — an extraordinary amount, given the growing consensus among foreign-policy thinkers that Clinton was one of the worst secretaries of state ever.

So why would Arab potentates and Wall Street magnates alike pony up so much money for the Clintons? Is it because they believe so strongly in the philanthropic mission of the Clinton Family Foundation? Or is it that they hoped to have influence on a future Hillary Clinton presidency, which would of course feature First Gentleman Bill Clinton?

Remember, a Hillary Clinton presidency once looked like a sure thing. Now, given the growing possibility that she could be charged for criminal negligence for putting secret material on a private server, or perhaps even be charged with corruption, Clinton has far more serious problems than just getting elected. Her biggest problem may be staying out of prison.

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...l-siphoned-100-mil-from-persian-gulf-leaders/​

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

Does anyone else find it strange that all of the countries that are funding global terrorist organizations (ISIS) have endorsed Hillary Clinton? @C130 @XenoEnsi-14 @Hamartia Antidote

ISIS, I mean, Saudi Arabia Endorses Hillary Clinton


View attachment 305862

​

The Clinton Foundation is receiving contributions from foreign governments, as Hillary Clinton gets ready for the 2016 presidential campaign.

According to The Wall Street Journal, donors include the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany, and a Canadian government.

Hillary Clinton re-joined the foundation after leaving the State Department in 2013 and has fronted a $250 million endowment campaign, Fox News Reported.

The Journal has reported that foreign donors doubled in 2014:

-UAE donated between $1 million and $5 million last year.
-Germany gave between $100,000 and $250,000.
-Saudi Arabia, which has contributed at least $10 million since the foundation’s founding in 1999.

Does this sound strange to you?

Why is Saudi Arabia, Oman, UAE interested in funding Clinton’s possible presidential campaign?


http://conservativepost.com/united-...llary-clinton-as-potential-president-in-2016/

​

Nope, doesn't sound strange. She's a career politician.

 

[RabzonKhan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/728947807055446017

https://twitter.com/x/status/733768274970857473

https://twitter.com/x/status/733707072018190336

 

[T-72M1]

 

[RabzonKhan]

Told you so, Latinos do not like the racist demagogue!

And the important point to note is that they support Hillary overwhelmingly on all important issues.

Latinos favor Clinton over Trump by 39-point margin, Fox News Latino poll finds

With less than six months to go before the presidential elections, Latinos overwhelmingly support Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton over presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, according to a Fox News Latino poll released on Friday.

The poll found that 62 percent of registered Latino voters would head to the ballot box for Clinton in November, while only 23 percent would support Trump on Election Day – a finding that many experts say is not surprising given the two candidates’ differing stances on issues important to Latinos.

"In terms of job performance, Hispanics said the former secretary of state would represent their views better than Trump (72 percent to 14 percent), making decisions about nuclear weapons (65 percent to 20 percent), nominating the next Supreme Court justice (66 percent to 24 percent) and making the decisions about using military force (60 percent to 29 percent), among other issues.

Clinton leads in every demographic group particularly among Latina women (68 to 17 percent) and among Mexican-Americans (the largest Hispanic group in the nation) 67 to 21 percent." Read more

@Falcon29 @T-72M1

 

[Falcon29]

@RabzonKhan

We all knew that coming in, he still has a good chunk of support among them, and has time to reverse these trends.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Hillary’s Latest Scandal: She And Bill Siphoned $100 Mil From Mideast Leaders


View attachment 305864

​

Scandal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders. Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly function as our nation’s leader?

The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has uncovered a disturbing pattern of the Clintons’ raising money for the Clinton Foundation from regimes that have checkered records on human rights and that aren’t always operating in the best interests of the U.S. By the way, the $100 million we mentioned above doesn’t appear to include another $30 million given to the Clintons by two Mideast-based foundations and four billionaire Saudis.

All told, it’s a lot of money.

“These regimes are buying access,” Patrick Poole, a national security analyst who regularly writes for PJ Media, told the DCNF. “You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension.”

That’s what I call third-rate fear mongering journalism. Someone should tell Mr. Patrick Poole that all the countries that he mentions, like it or not, are America’s closest allies in the Middle East, so what’s the damn big deal?

Unfortunately, this is how the American political system works, do I like it, of course not, did it needs to change, of course yes, but the change has to come from both sites, Republicans and Democrats.

And if someone is interested, I can show, Hillary has been more critical of Saudi Arabia than many other politicians, especially the Republicans.

Maybe to have a little balance, Mr. Patrick Poole should also look at Donald Trump’s business dealings in the Middle East.

Here’s Donald Trump with his daughter Ivanka promoting his golf club in Dubai:

Well, maybe not, given that Clinton, during her four-year tenure as secretary of state, used a clearly illegal private email server which is now under investigation by the FBI. Her open e-mail system likely was hacked by Chinese, Russian and perhaps other spy agencies, say cyberespionage experts. Such negligence would seem to disqualify her from ever holding a sensitive foreign policy post in the government again.

Using a private email server is NOT illegal, someone seriously needs to educate himself, and there are no credible reports to suggest that her private email was hacked by the Chinese, Russians or any other spy agencies.

Having said that, I agree, what Hillary did was undefendable, without any doubt, it was a poor judgment on her part, but so far, all the information which has been made public, it clearly shows that what she did was not criminal.

Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly more serious investigation into possible political corruption involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive, given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way that lines their own pockets.

Typical baloney, since I have not come across any other source supporting such allegations.

The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton’s business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took away some $15 million in “guaranteed payments” from the deal, his tax records show.

Good question, or maybe not, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum is also Trumps business partner, Urdu/Hindi proverb, iss hamam mein sab nange hain (all are in the same boat).

 

[RabzonKhan]

@RabzonKhan

We all knew that coming in, he still has a good chunk of support among them, and has time to reverse these trends.

Fair enough, the reason I mentioned you was because in one of your previous post you had questioned, Hillary’s support among the Hispanic voters.

In my opinion, Trump is stuck in the Catch-22 situation, if he tries to increase his support among the Hispanics, he could very well lose the support of white racists, coming days and months are going to be very interesting.

Cheers!

 

[T-72M1]

racist demagogue!

so you hate the guy, fine, but do not make the mistake of underestimating his appeal, because it is not exclusively limited to racial nationalists like the kkk and anti muslim/immigrant/brown/latino bigots.

He's on tv 24/7, helicopters follow his convoy around when he's holding meetings, and it's broadcast globally (his NRA address yesterday was live on a couple channels here in Hindustan)

He continues to earn massive amounts of media, all he has to do is show up:

'crooked' Hillary is only counting on his -ves to stick and hoping for him to finally trip over himself with something stupid he says, not going to happen, odds are the people will only love him more for it

16 stalwart republicans down, democrat Hillary is next.

The upside, I truly don't believe the guy is a racist, or that he thinks that all muslims are terrorists etc, he made a big play for the right wing (out right winged everybody) and won a landslide primary, next he'll make a play for the left and minorities etc and win big (or enough) of them overall as well.

the foreign policy of a Trump presidency would be pragmatic and measured, maybe even a bit to the left of crooked Hillary, he might surprise us all.

 

[Desert Fox]

the racist demagogue!

You still haven't proven he's a racist, yet you keep parroting on like a SJW "racist demagogue".

Hillary Clinton with "former" KKK Grand Dragon Robert Byrd

That’s what I call third-rate fear mongering journalism. Someone should tell Mr. Patrick Poole that all the countries that he mentions, like it or not, are America’s closest allies in the Middle East, so what’s the damn big deal?

Unfortunately, this is how the American political system works, do I like it, of course not, did it needs to change, of course yes, but the change has to come from both sites, Republicans and Democrats.

And if someone is interested, I can show, Hillary has been more critical of Saudi Arabia than many other politicians, especially the Republicans.

Maybe to have a little balance, Mr. Patrick Poole should also look at Donald Trump’s business dealings in the Middle East.

Here’s Donald Trump with his daughter Ivanka promoting his golf club in Dubai:
View attachment 306214
View attachment 306215


Using a private email server is NOT illegal, someone seriously needs to educate himself, and there are no credible reports to suggest that her private email was hacked by the Chinese, Russians or any other spy agencies.

Having said that, I agree, what Hillary did was undefendable, without any doubt, it was a poor judgment on her part, but so far, all the information which has been made public, it clearly shows that what she did was not criminal.


Typical baloney, since I have not come across any other source supporting such allegations.


Good question, or maybe not, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum is also Trumps business partner, Urdu/Hindi proverb, iss hamam mein sab nange hain (all are in the same boat).

Trump is not the one getting $100 million donations from Terrorist supporting countries.

@RabzonKhan

We all knew that coming in, he still has a good chunk of support among them, and has time to reverse these trends.

Trump is leading Hillary in the latest polls. Nobody but the mentally unstable wants a murderer/liar for President.

 

[Falcon29]

@RabzonKhan @Desert Fox

I'm not sure, his wall policy will remain, so he won't lose support from whites. White's aren't the only ones that care about illegal immigration. I don't expect him to exceed 40-45% support among latino's, but that would be enough for him to win if he does.

 

[T-72M1]

https://twitter.com/x/status/734468142303305728

https://twitter.com/x/status/734468447829004288

https://twitter.com/x/status/734517899960934400

 

[T-72M1]

too bad crazy bernie has no chance

she'll lose big league.

 

[Assadynasty]

Trump won Washington