What's new

US plans to sabotage Pakistan nuke facilities: Ahmadinejad

Who is telling the truth here "TruthSeeker" or the Iranian President?

Will a act of exploding Pakistan's nuclear weapons result in Pakistani public anger and take over of US Embassey, US Consulate, US Personnel as hostages? Too bad of a scenario. Though the US Embassey and British Consulates were taken over and burnt in the mid-80s.

The USA plan calls for increasing tensions between India and Pakistan first. Then we will remove most of our personnel from Pakistan because these tensions are worrying us. (The American personnel who remain are, regrettably, expendable.) Next we will initiate a false flag "attack" from India, causing the PA move and arm its nukes. At that point our computer virus will cause many of the Pakistani nukes to explode, in Pakistan, causing huge destruction of Pakistan and radiation fallout that makes much of Pakistan uninhabitable. Also, it will make your remaining, unexploded nukes impossible to handle. Pakistani nuke problem - solved!! So, Ahmadinejad is correct about the US plan to "sabotage" your nukes, he just doesn't know the full extent of our evil plan ......
 
.
The USA plan calls for increasing tensions between India and Pakistan first. Then we will remove most of our personnel from Pakistan because these tensions are worrying us. (The American personnel who remain are, regrettably, expendable.) Next we will initiate a false flag "attack" from India, causing the PA move and arm its nukes. At that point our computer virus will cause many of the Pakistani nukes to explode, in Pakistan, causing huge destruction of Pakistan and radiation fallout that makes much of Pakistan uninhabitable. Also, it will make your remaining, unexploded nukes impossible to handle. Pakistani nuke problem - solved!! So, Ahmadinejad is correct about the US plan to "sabotage" your nukes, he just doesn't know the full extent of our evil plan ......

Thanks for sharing the TOOOP Secret. India is going to fight a War with Pakistan because US wants it to and set itself 50 years back economically, OK. While US removing all personnel, will that also be from Afghsnistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf and other places that are in the reach of Pakistani conventional missiles or is the Stunkest going to disable all of the conventional missiles too, please share the whole secret now.

US can sabotage Pakistan's nuclear program and kill Pakistanis in Pakistan but at what cost will be determined not by the US.
 
.
Iran and Israel are one of the biggest hypocrites of the modern times.

The Iranian government and the Israeli government are two sides of the same coin.

In public Iran utters highly hostile statements against Israel and behind the scenes they work with each other.

If Israel and Iran were "real enemies" Israel (in partnership with USA) would have attacked Iran a long time ago keeping in view the very hostile sentences (no other Islamic Government uses such hostile statements against Israel) used by Iranian governments for Israel.

Israel-Iran behind the door dealings

Khalaf Al Habtoor writes: Show of enmity is a strategy designed to con Arabs while both countries, and Washington, expand regional influence

By Khalaf Al Habtoor
Published: June 8, 2011

A scandal that has recently erupted in Israel concerning a private Israeli shipping and transport group — Ofer Brothers — that sold a tanker to Iran via a well-known Iranian front company and has been transporting petroleum products to and from Iran for a decade, heightens my suspicions that nothing is what it seems in the dirty world of geopolitics.

On the one hand, the Netanyahu government has been calling upon Washington to tighten anti-Iranian sanctions while on the other a company owned by Israel's richest man — the late Sami Ofer (he died on June 2, aged 89) — has been trading with Iran for years while his ships have been regularly docking at Iranian ports.

Israeli officials have denied they knew what was going on. However, conspiracy theorists are having a field day after a discussion held by members of the Knesset Economic Affairs Committee on the issue was cut short by the Defence Ministry's Security Chief who once served on the board of Ofer Brothers.

Initially, the Ofer family asserted they had dealt with Iran on Israel's behalf but have since u-turned on that defence provoking speculation a deal has been done. Anyone who imagines that the Mossad and the Shin Bet have been in the dark for 10 years must be naïve in the extreme and for all anyone knows, the Ofer revelations could well be just the tip of the iceberg.

This echoes the Nahum Manbar controversy. The former Israeli Army paratrooper was accused of selling components used to make mustard gas and nerve gas to Iran. He was imprisoned for 16 years in 1997 subsequent to a trial held behind closed doors. Author and former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky revealed Manbar's connections with Israel's security services while other insiders suggested Israel used him as a fall guy when the transaction became known.

Manbar has always insisted his dealings with the Iranians were blessed by the Israeli intelligence community and is none too pleased that the Ofers seem to be getting off lightly. "The establishment took revenge on me while they, the Ofer Brothers, have connections in government and nobody's touching them," he said.

Last week, Ynetnews reported that "Israel-Iran trade ties are thriving' with ‘dozens of Israeli companies secretly engaging in relations with the Islamic Republic through third parties". The article quotes the chairman of the Israeli-Arab Friendship Association Yehoshua Meiri saying, "Despite what is seen on the ground, the secret relations with Iran total tens of millions of dollars a year … Even when harsh statements are made on both sides, business thrives. Relations with the Iranian colleagues are excellent and political statements are ignored".

Just days before, Tehran's Trade Ministry had to answer to Iranian exporters/importers who claimed Israeli apples and oranges were on sale in the country's markets. It's an open secret that Israel buys marble, cashews and pistachios from Iran while Iran imports organic fertiliser, artificial hormones to boost milk production, irrigation pipes and seeds from Israel.

How can that be, you are probably asking yourself, when President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been relentlessly bashing Israel since he took office? According to a recent article on Yedioth Ahronoth's English-language website, "Ahmadinejad's top adviser Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei stated three years ago that Iran should have ‘friendly ties' with the Jewish state, a statement that was supported by his boss.

In one of my recent columns, I suggested that the mutual enmity currently displayed between the US/Israel and Iran could be part cinema, allowing Tehran to curry favour with the Arab world, Israel to pinpoint Iran as a threat to its existence in order to propagate its victim status — and America a pretext to maintain military bases in the region.

I highlighted that although Washington and Tehran have been ‘sworn enemies' since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the Iranians facilitated Israel's bombing of an Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981 and the Reagan administration shipped weapons to Iran during the mid-1980s via Israel. Following the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Iran offered to train Afghan troops under US supervision and urged Shiite Iraqis not to resist the US-led occupiers.

Moreover, despite Iran's failure to allay the international community's suspicions that Iran may be developing nuclear weapons, anti-Iranian sanctions have been toothless compared to those that crippled Saddam Hussain's Iraq for 10 years.

On this, President Barack Obama has been sending mixed messages. Last month, he vowed to keep up the pressure on Iran but the question is ‘what pressure'? It certainly isn't the same sort of pressure the White House heaped on Hosni Mubarak and Zine Al Abidine Bin Ali to step down. The bottom line is that all three military powers consider the Middle East and the Gulf as their sphere of influence and wouldn't shed a tear if the Arabs were to lose their grip on this strategically-positioned, oil and gas-rich region.

I would urge the Gulf Cooperation Council leadership to focus on the menacing dangers and pursue political and military independence; in particular, Egypt should resist Tehran's self-serving overtures to normalise diplomatic relations. With the Israel-Palestine peace process in its death throes, storms brewing over the Arab Spring and Iran working to expand its influence, sitting on the fence and hoping for the best is no longer an option.

gulfnews : Israel-Iran behind the door dealings
 
.
Who is telling the truth here "TruthSeeker" or the Iranian President?

Will a act of exploding Pakistan's nuclear weapons result in Pakistani public anger and take over of US Embassey, US Consulate, US Personnel as hostages? Too bad of a scenario. Though the US Embassey and British Consulates were taken over and burnt in the mid-80s.

but think about rest of Pakistanis world wide! what will happen to them??? not a wise move i think.
 
.
a great nation like Iran surely deserves a better president. this guy beats all the conspiracy theorists single handedly. his statements are causing more trouble to Iran forget about benefits.
 
.
a great nation like Iran surely deserves a better president. this guy beats all the conspiracy theorists single handedly. his statements are causing more trouble to Iran forget about benefits.

Well, don't forget to take apart in the next general election in Iran, after all, the americans and the indians make up more than 75% of the Iranian vote bank!
Elecetions in the Muslim countries are not 'free and fair' until the great americans and their allies take part in them.
 
.
Thanks for sharing the TOOOP Secret. India is going to fight a War with Pakistan because US wants it to and set itself 50 years back economically, OK. While US removing all personnel, will that also be from Afghsnistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf and other places that are in the reach of Pakistani conventional missiles or is the Stunkest going to disable all of the conventional missiles too, please share the whole secret now.

US can sabotage Pakistan's nuclear program and kill Pakistanis in Pakistan but at what cost will be determined not by the US.

Yes! at least at the cost of ISRAEL.......i guess.....its pretty big cost.....:azn:
 
. . . . .
Pakistan to seek details from Iran on US plot

Ansar Abbasi, Thursday, June 09, 2011

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan will soon contact Iran to get details about the US plan to sabotage its nuclear facilities as suspicion about the US conspiracy to denuclearise the only nuclear Islamic state grew after the Iranian president’s latest statement, it was learnt.

Pakistani security institutions were alarmed by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Tuesday statement that Washington was planning to sabotage Pakistan’s nuclear facilities. According to a senior security official source, Pakistan also has indications about what the Iranian president has referred to. The source said that Pakistan would be keen to get the details of Iran’s intelligence information.

Speaking at a media conference in the Iranian capital, Ahmadinejad said, “We have precise information that America wants to sabotage Pakistan’s nuclear facilities in order to control Pakistan and to weaken the government and the people of Pakistan.” The president added, “The United States would then use the UN Security Council and some other international bodies as levers to prepare the ground for a massive presence (in Pakistan) and weaken the national sovereignty of Pakistan.”

The Iranian president did not give details nor revealed the source of his information but Pakistani authorities, which got alarmed by this extremely- serious warning from Iran, would soon contact the Iranian authorities to get the precise details of the US plot against Pakistan’s nukes.

Washington has though given repeated assurances to Islamabad that it has nothing against Pakistan’s nuclear devices, Pakistani authorities do not trust the Americans. “We know that the ultimate objective of the United States here is not to get a piece of land but to target our nuclear facilities,” the source said.

It is said that Pakistan had been voicing its concerns even to the US authorities but in a diplomatic manner. However, the Iranian president has said the same thing in a candid and frank manner. It is said that even Army chief General Ashfaq Pervez Kayani has conveyed to US President Obama his growing apprehensions that the US was deliberately creating chaos within Pakistan in order to denuclearise Pakistan.

“It is an issue of Pakistan’s national security, which cannot be compromised,” the source said, adding Pakistan’s nuclear facilities are well-guarded whereas our nuclear command and control system is one of the best.

Senator John Kerry, Chairman Foreign Relations Committee of the US Senate, had assured the Pakistani authorities during his last visit to Islamabad that Washington was not after Pakistan’s nukes. He said that he could even write with his blood that the US was not after Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

However, there is no dearth of statements and media reports coming out of Washington, which have been casting serious aspersions on Pakistan’s nuclear programme. The European and American media has even been propagating what is considered here as nonsensical but conspiratorial campaign against Pakistan’s nuclear programme that al-Qaeda and Taliban could capture Pakistan’s nuclear devices.

Pakistan to seek details from Iran on US plot
 
.
Are we being cornered?
By:Nazir Naj

The disclosure by Iranian President Ahmedinejad that America was out to sabotage Pakistan’s nuclear assets cannot be ignored. He claimed, “We have precise information that America wants to sabotage the Pakistani nuclear facilities in order to control Pakistan and to weaken the government and people of Pakistan.” He added, “The United States would then use the UN Security Council and some other international bodies as levers to prepare the ground for a massive presence (in Pakistan).”

There are concrete and effective sources to find out what some states are upto against other states and what operations they want to carry out against them. Since Iran and the US have been engaged in a virtual cold war for three decades, this must mean that they are definitely expending special intelligence efforts to find out about each other’s plans. Iran wouldn’t have needed any special effort to get this information about Pakistan. The sources they would have been using to discover America’s designs about their own nuclear assets must have led them to intel regarding Pakistan which was subsequently revealed by Ahmedinejad.

This news reaching Iranian sources may mean that whatever the US has in store for Iran, it can also be assumed that it has similar designs regarding Pakistan and that it is also bracketing Pakistan in the same slot as Iran. Both these countries are located in the same region and the posting of American forces in the Gulf, Afghanistan, Qatar, Iraq and the Arabian Sea is such that a joint operation in Iran and Pakistan could be conducted. It may be that the Iranian president did not reveal their entire findings out of expedient concerns but the room for the suspicion still remains that American policy with regards to nuclear assets has been devised or is being devised by lumping the two nations together.

The Iranian president also revealed that the US is going to use the UNSC for its proceedings against Pakistan’s nuclear assets. This is something for which open proofs are already available. Much has been made of sanctuaries of international terrorist organisations in Pakistan. The people making this noise don’t need more evidence to prove that the centres located in Pakistan are now being used to plan for terrorist activities outside Pakistan’s borders, to train and export terrorists to other countries and then supervise their goings-on. The UN has already called upon Pakistan government to take action against the illegal terrorist organisations present here. The UN itself has declared these organisations illegal and it has handed a list of organisations to the Pakistan government to move against.


No further proof is needed of OBL’s presence in Pakistan either. The only question that now remains is who were his aides and guardians? No one is ready to believe that a man unfamiliar with Pakistan’s languages and culture could be stationed right beneath the army’s nose for five years and conduct the affairs of his terrorist organisation with relative convenience. We shouldn’t treat OBL’s presence in the country like any other matter. This series of events will be taken to its logical end and many dangerous accusations can be levelled against Pakistan due to this.

Furthermore, the attack on the Mehran base has created many difficulties for us. This was an extremely sensitive installment. The security arrangements for this base weren’t less than the most stringent arrangement to be found in Pakistan. Still, highly trained and armed terrorist were able to infiltrate the base and then hit a live target from as close as a mile. It is true that four of the terrorists were killed but there is also the fact that two of them were able to escape.

As if this wasn’t enough, the most explosive news to come forward was that the navy itself had some Al-Qaeda cells in it. Ten members of a cell had been actually apprehended and the investigation was ongoing. Navy personnel had also negotiated with the terrorists but it was their demand that these people should not be punished and that they should be reinstated into their posts. What can be inferred from this? Obviously that Al-Qaeda has spread to an extent in Pakistan that not only is it capable enough to parley with our defence forces but also to demand that its sympathisers not be booted out of their jobs.

What will international defence analysts be speculating about this? Who can stop them from thinking that if there are Al-Qaeda cells in the navy, then the existence of similar cells in the air force and army is a definite possibility? Why can’t these sympathisers be from those deigned to protect these sensitive installments? The troublesome and unsettling speculation taking place in the international media after the Mehran base incident should make us very worried indeed. They should give us sleepless nights. These conjectures are positing that nuclear devices were present on the base and the fact that the terrorists did not reach them is either because of the fact that they do not want destruction on such a large scale or they were unaware of the presence of these devices.

We don’t know of all the facts but the US and the agencies of our enemy countries have cultivated a lot of resources in Pakistan to collect such information.
If Al-Qaeda can create its cells in an institution like the navy, why can’t foreign agencies do the same? If moles of the US or any adversarial foreign agency provide this kind of intelligence (i.e. that which confirms that nuclear devices were present in the Mehran base), the US can then use it to go to the Security Council. The revelations of the Iranian President corroborate such reservations.

I don’t think America will be foolhardy enough to destroy our nuclear assets. That would be tantamount to unleashing mini-hell on earth. But what it can do is use the UNSC to place some very harsh sanctions on Pakistan and these sanctions can then be tightened to an extent that Pakistan is left helpless with no other choice but to give up its nuclear assets. After all, it’s no big deal now to accuse that the presence of extremist elements within our forces creates the possibility that they might hand over some nuclear device or part of it to terrorists. Such an accusation will set alarm bells ringing in the entire world.

In normal circumstances, China would be a reliable helper in this case. But if China can be convinced through proofs that the nuclear capability that the terrorists get through Pakistan may be employed against it, then this will create a situation where it will be very easy to convince Pakistan to give up its nuclear assets. (Lol, no country to give up nuclear assets in history)

Many dangers seem to be looming large and heading straight for us. But the national unity and concord required to deal with such perils is nowhere in sight.
 
.
Good references for Americans. US Nuclears is very concern and must investigate through IAEA in falling wrong hands.

Pakistan show concern with US nuclear proliferation and bad record

A Nuclear Needle in a Haystack
The Cold War's Missing Atom Bombs

By Benjamin Maack

In a 1968 plane crash, the US military lost an atom bomb in Greenland's Arctic ice. But this was no isolated case. Up to 50 nuclear warheads are believed to have gone missing during the Cold War, and not all of them are in unpopulated areas.
Info

It was a little early to be swimming in the Mediterranean that year. But in early March 1966, Manuel Fraga Iribarne, the Spanish information minister at the time, and Biddle Duke, the American ambassador in Madrid, together with their respective families, plunged into the chilly waters off the Costa Cálida. Journalists from around the world had gathered on the beach of the small village of Palomares to report on the two families' spring bathing outing. Their interest would have been surprising, if it hadn't been for the hydrogen bomb lying on the ocean floor only a few kilometers away, a bomb with more than 1,000 times the explosive force of the one that flattened Hiroshima.

Only a few weeks earlier, on Jan. 17, 1966, the worst nuclear weapons incident of the entire Cold War had taken place off Spain's southeastern coast. During an aerial tanking maneuver, an American B-52 bomber and a KC-135 tanking aircraft collided in mid-air at 9,000 meters (29,000 feet), and both planes exploded in a giant fireball over Palomares. There were four hydrogen bombs in the hold of the B-52. One landed, unharmed, in tomato fields near the village. The non-nuclear fuse detonated in two others causing bomb fragments and plutonium dust to rain down on the impact site. The fourth bomb fell into the water somewhere off the coast, burying itself in several meters of silt. But where exactly did it fall?

Reprints

Find out how you can reprint this SPIEGEL ONLINE article.
In the weeks after the accident, Palomares looked like the set for a film about the apocalypse. On land, men wearing white protective suits and blue facemasks used Geiger counters to scan the ground for radiation. The fields were sealed off, and an entire harvest of tomatoes and beans rotted on the vine. The US government had the fields dug up and 1,400 tons of earth removed. The contaminated soil was then shipped to the United States for disposal. Dozens of American warships patrolled the coastline to seal off the area where a fisherman had seen the bomb landing in the water. It took 81 days to recover the nuclear weapon from a depth of 800 meters (2,600 feet). Expressing its shock over the events in Spain, the German daily Hamburger Abendblatt wrote: "More than any sandbox scenario, the bomb incident makes it clear what it means today to be 'living with the bomb'."

Greenland's Stray Atomic Bomb


The prospect of a stray, possibly damaged atom bomb lying somewhere on the ocean floor is truly horrific. Britain's BBC is currently causing an uproar with a report on the loss of an American atom bomb in 1968. When an American B-52 bomber crashed into the ice off Greenland, the conventional explosives in the bombs exploded, causing a large area to become radioactively contaminated by the plutonium that was released in the process. But what the US government kept secret for decades was that a reconstruction of the bomb components found at the site had revealed that a nuclear warhead was missing. It had apparently drilled its way through the ice in North Star Bay. It was never found.

The loss of an atom bomb is not as rare an occurrence as one would hope. "The American Defense Department has confirmed the loss of 11 atomic bombs," says Otfried Nassauer, an expert on nuclear armament and the director of the Berlin Information Center for Transatlantic Security. "It is believed that up to 50 nuclear weapons worldwide were lost during the Cold War."

Most of these highly dangerous weapons are still lying on the ocean floor. In April 1989, a fire on board the Komsomolez resulted in the sinking of the Russian nuclear submarine to a depth of 1,700 meters (5,500 feet) in the North Atlantic Ocean, together with two torpedoes and their nuclear warheads. On May 22, 1968, another nuclear submarine, the USS Scorpion, sank to a depth of 3,300 meters (10,800 feet) about 320 nautical miles south of the Azores. There were two nuclear warheads on board. Because of the considerable depths involved, neither the weaponry nor the nuclear reactors on both submarines have been recovered to date.

Absurd 'Broken Arrow'

A much larger number of atom bombs disappeared in plane crashes over the open ocean. "In the early days of the Cold War, the aircraft lacked sufficient range to cross the Atlantic on one tank of fuel," explains nuclear expert Nassauer. "Some bombers collided with their tanker planes, while others simply missed the tankers and, after running out of fuel, plunged into the sea."

Between the late 1950s and mid-1960s, the most explosive part of the Cold War, US bombers carrying atom bombs were in the air around the clock, 365 days a year. Their four main routes passed over Greenland, Spain and the Mediterranean, Japan and Alaska. Only when the bombers became capable of flying across the Atlantic or Pacific on one tank did the frequency of accidents diminish.

Probably the most absurd "broken arrow" (the Americans' code word for accidents involving nuclear weapons) happened on Dec. 5, 1965 on board the USS Ticonderoga. The aircraft carrier was en route from Vietnam to Yokosuka in Japan when a fighter-bomber emerging from one of the giant elevators that carry the aircraft from the ship's hold onto the deck plunged into the ocean. The pilot, the aircraft and the nuclear bomb on board sank to a depth of five kilometers (16,400 feet) and were never found.

That incident was also kept secret for many years, partly because, when it was finally made public in 1981, it proved that the Americans had stationed nuclear weapons in Vietnam, after all. It also revealed that the United States had defied a treaty with Japan, under which the Americans had agreed not to bring any nuclear weapons onto Japanese territory.

Blown Fuses


The US military's rather nonchalant handling of its most dangerous toys was not limited to foreign countries. In fact, seven of the 11 nuclear warheads that are officially missing were lost at home in the USA. On Feb. 5, 1958, bomber pilot Howard Richardson had to jettison the hydrogen bomb he was carrying after colliding with a fighter jet. The bomb then disappeared in the shallow waters of Wassaw Sound, about 20 kilometers (12 miles) from Savannah, Georgia, a city of 100,000 people. Richardson, an experienced pilot, barely managed to land his aircraft at nearby Hunter Army Airfield.

The crew of a B-52 that exploded on Jan. 24, 1961 as a result of a defective fuel line was less fortunate. Before the aircraft broke apart, the men managed to eject their dangerous cargo. One of the two hydrogen bombs was parachuted safely into a tree, while the other one went down in a swamp near the small city of Goldsboro, North Carolina, where it plunged an estimated 50 meters (165 feet) into the marshy ground -- and where it still lies today. The crash site remains a restricted military zone.

But what made this incident famous was the bomb that landed in a tree. Five of its six fuses designed to prevent a detonation failed, with only the last one averting a nuclear explosion. After this near-disaster, the security systems in US nuclear weapons were revised, and Washington asked the Soviet Union to do the same.

Could Terrorists Find a Bomb?

To this day, these two incidents are a hotly disputed topic among experts, military officials, conspiracy theorists and the concerned citizens of Savannah and Goldsboro. Do the two bombs still pose a danger to the residents of these cities? "Weapons that are on the ocean floor are hardly unlikely to explode," says Nassauer. Nevertheless, he cautions, "perhaps this risk is somewhat greater with the bombs that were lost on land. But virtually nothing is known about whether such bombs can explode spontaneously."

A completely different fear has taken hold since the terrorist attacks of Sep. 11, 2001. What happens if terrorists acquire one of the lost bombs? An unfounded fear, says Nassauer, noting that even the military, after using all means at its disposal, has failed to find or salvage the bombs. "Quite a few weapons are located in places that are still completely inaccessible with the means available to us today," says Nassauer. The real dangers lie in the area surrounding a crash site, and they include the possibility of explosion at the time of the accident and the effects of corrosion, which could allow radioactivity to escape over decades.

In Palomares, for example, the nightmare continues after more than four decades. The sleepy village his since become part of a thriving tourist region. But in 2004, two pits containing radioactive soil were discovered at the site of future golf courses and luxury hotels. Extensive soil studies revealed that other areas were still contaminated. The Spanish government has confiscated the affected land, and in 2009 US troops will be deployed to decontaminate the area once again. More than 40 years after the first bomb fell on Palomares, several thousand tons of contaminated earth will be shipped to America once again.[/QUOTE]


A Nuclear Needle in a Haystack: The Cold War's Missing Atom Bombs - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
 
.
Im sorry but after may 2, i don't agree with this that US cann't get our nukes. i think surely they can nuetralize our nukes if they want to. Our millitary and Security agencies sorry to say have failed time and again. So there is no guarantee that they would not fail again.

Bro, read my analysis of Abbotabad attack, there is no way Pakistan was unaware, they were not only aware but took active part. I am going to up date the thread with new info and analysis. In the last up date I highlighted the report from American defence site, that the Americans had one interpretor on board the helicopters.

Please look at the eye witness videos from any Pakistani channel, all the witnesses in the area said, there were people on the ground knocking doors and telling the residents in Pushtoo to stay in doors and do not get out of their houses. So who were they? Think.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom