What's new

US plans "significant" Pakistan missile sale

A.Rahman

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
4,728
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration said Wednesday it was planning to let Pakistan buy advanced Boeing Co. Harpoon anti-ship missiles and related equipment valued at up to $370 million in "a significant upgrade" of the Asian nation's existing weapons systems.

Of the total "Block II" Harpoon missiles sought by Pakistan, 50 would be for launch from submarines, 50 from surface ships and 30 by air, the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a notice to Congress required by law.
The equipment would provide "a significant upgrade to Pakistan's existing systems and allow for improved target acquisition," said the agency, which handles U.S. government-to-government weapons sales.
The notice does not mean that a sale has been concluded. In addition, Congress can interfere.
"This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that continues to be a key ally in the global war on terrorism," the agency added.
Chicago-based Boeing describes the advanced Harpoon as capable of knocking out coastal defenses, surface-to-air missile sites and exposed aircraft as well as ships in port. It uses a satellite-aided inertial navigation system.
The upgraded targeting capability "significantly reduces the risk of hitting noncombatant targets, thus improving Pakistan's naval operational flexibility," the agency told Congress.
Pakistan, which has fought three wars with neighboring India since partition of British India in 1947, plans to use the Harpoon on its Lockheed Martin Corp. P-3 maritime surveillance aircraft, surface ships and submarines, the agency said.
The Bush administration last June signed a 10-year defense pact with India outlining expanded two-way defense trade, missile-defense cooperation plans and increased opportunities for technology transfers and weapons co-production.
Last year, Pentagon officials gave India a classified briefing on Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC-3) short-range missile defense systems built by Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed and Raytheon Co. of Waltham, Massachusetts.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060531/ts_nm/arms_pakistan_usa_dc
 
.
This is a signifacant boost to the PN

PN will sure be a force to be reckon with in the future
 
.
It looks as if USA is giving its biggest non-NATO friend a penny, and to its enemy a full dollar
 
.
umairperacha said:
It looks as if USA is giving its biggest non-NATO friend a penny, and to its enemy a full dollar
I'm least bothered by who's getting a penny or a dollar.
We have better access to world market today than ever before and it would make us less vulnerable if we diversify our supplies.
 
.
Neo said:
I'm least bothered by who's getting a penny or a dollar.
We have better access to world market today than ever before and it would make us less vulnerable if we diversify our supplies.
The point is, are we taking full (or even half) of its advantage.
 
.
US consider's PAKISTAN as an ally only in war against terror.............................and dont knw wat type of war is this.
 
.
airbus said:
US consider's PAKISTAN as an ally only in war against terror.............................and dont knw wat type of war is this.


It is the same US type of war ;) not war on terror but war on capturing OIL (The main contributor to US development) where ever it may be found.
 
.
umairperacha said:
The point is, are we taking full (or even half) of its advantage.
I'm pleased with the things they are at the moment. China is our main supplier and gaining importance constantly, US and France come second.
Once we start spending big $$$ in near future, other markets will open their doors.
The AEWACS deal with Sweden is a moral victory, anti lobby by India didn't work here and if the Marlin deals gets inked it will be another major one. :)
 
.
yeah. Now that Pakistan has developed Babur and Raad, they want to give us a 'significant' missile pack. why tie up $370m on an outdated missile system for which India already has ABMs rather than develop our own ASH missiles. How about a Mach 4 beast to match the bramhoss.
 
.
yeah. Now that Pakistan has developed Babur and Raad, they want to give us a 'significant' missile pack. why tie up $370m on an outdated missile system for which India already has ABMs rather than develop our own ASH missiles. How about a Mach 4 beast to match the bramhoss.

'Us' means Pakistan?! Your flag says India.
 
.
yeah. Now that Pakistan has developed Babur and Raad, they want to give us a 'significant' missile pack. why tie up $370m on an outdated missile system for which India already has ABMs rather than develop our own ASH missiles. How about a Mach 4 beast to match the bramhoss.

Welcome aboard Wulff, kindly request you to introduce yourself so we can give you a warm welcome. :cheers:
 
.
Bull,

That is an interesting observation!

A Pakistani in Indian garb?

I wish one could check his IP.

It is like the Liberian tankers. Owned by someone from a different country and flying the flag of convenience!

Sir,

I believe Wulff meant "Now that Pakistan has developed Babur and Raad, US want to give them/you a 'significant' missile pack." :coffee:

The IP and email is registered in India, I have no reason to doubt that our new member is not an Indian.
Let him clarify himself.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom