US pays Pakistan to hunt down terror suspects

[kidwaibhai]

the money goes to the governments bugdet. this does not go into the hands of private individuals.

 

[Keysersoze]

Comparing Full Blown Wars to Capturing individuals.Funny
Comparing Terrorist to Soldiers, Sad to hear from a Soldier Himself.
Did you retire or resign?

Tell you what.....you go serve a term and then tell what it is sad to hear from a soldier. otherwise feel free to shut the hell up. I have noted that the people with the strongest political opinions rarely fight for them.

Wearing a uniform does not equate to
1)not having free will.
2)Not Having a opinion that is contrary to the all knowing Adux

 

[Keysersoze]

For what are Britishers fighting for in Iraq and Afghanistan. Isnt they also to be classified as mercanaries by the same definitioon given by you.

Well no they are being funded by the U.K. taxpayer. And that is contrary to the opinion I gave I suggest you go re-read it.

 

[Awesome]

Pakistan gets Aid for putting soldiers on the ground as well as they get weapons as part of the Aids package, As well as Aid for Economic Support.

Aid is free money dude... Pakistan has given the US more expensive services than what the US has been billed for.

Why are they taking money for caputuring individuals,like bounty or in other words PRIZE money. When Pakistan is a government not a private individuals. So if there is no Prize Money , they wont act on a terrorist.

Which Pakistani official has ever charged for capturing an AQ individual? Dude we've not tied our bills to performance, but the US wants us to. We've tied them on to our own costs now.

The military and economic assistance package is also not really aid since it doesn't come to Pakistan for free. Imagine without Pakistan the US would've had to invade Iran through sea. Since that would've been impossible they would've first had to invade Iraq, then Iran, then Afghanistan.

That would've cost somewhere around a trillion dollars. Pakistan gave its airspace and it's logistical support. 3Bn dollars by comparison aren't that much. Those 3 Billion are the only benefit we've gotten. The rest of the 7 Billion that the article is quoting is just the cost of war on our end. The US made us spend it during the deployment.

 

[Bull]

the money goes to the governments bugdet. this does not go into the hands of private individuals.

Mushraff has confirmed it hasnt come into the govt account, and US has confirmed the payment as being made.

So then where is the money?

 

[Bull]

Well no they are being funded by the U.K. taxpayer. And that is contrary to the opinion I gave I suggest you go re-read it.

Ok so just because US asked others to pay for it, they are mercanories. While you fight using your own money. The aims are the same, the motives are the same.

So Britishers dont have any moral high ground.

 

[Adux]

Tell you what.....you go serve a term and then tell what it is sad to hear from a soldier. otherwise feel free to shut the hell up. I have noted that the people with the strongest political opinions rarely fight for them.

Wearing a uniform does not equate to
1)not having free will.
2)Not Having a opinion that is contrary to the all knowing Adux

Keyser,

I dont agree with your opinions even at the base level. Please I will decide when I will shut up or not. I havent served and I have great respect for people who have. Wether I would pick up a Gun and Fight for the cause for my country; Yes I would. Would I be a Soldier just by doing so.NO

Cheers and I am off this thread

 

[Bull]

Tell you what.....you go serve a term and then tell what it is sad to hear from a soldier. otherwise feel free to shut the hell up. I have noted that the people with the strongest political opinions rarely fight for them.

Wearing a uniform does not equate to
1)not having free will.
2)Not Having a opinion that is contrary to the all knowing Adux

Oh all knowing Moderator, why dont u just leave it for the member to decide when to shut up and when to speak.

 

[EagleEyes]

Oh all knowing Moderator, why dont u just leave it for the member to decide when to shut up and when to speak.

It would rather be feasible not to spill emotional responses. The suggestion from the moderator as an effect to such responses is to shut up. In other words. Stop posting bullsh!t.

 

[Bull]

It would rather be feasible not to spill emotional responses. The suggestion from the moderator as an effect to such responses is to shut up. In other words. Stop posting bullsh!t.

Come on webby, Key is asking to shut up because he doesnt garee to it. Otherwise what bullshit has he spoken.

Or are you saying that one cant debate with a mod.

 

[EagleEyes]

Bull re-read the Adux post, where he quotes earlier post.

The attitude is simply not tollerated with the combination of usual bullshit that has increased. I hope we are not having a post count competition.

Thanks.

 

[Bull]

Bull re-read the Adux post, where he quotes earlier post.

The attitude is simply not tollerated with the combination of usual bullshit that has increased. I hope we are not having a post count competition.

Thanks.

Definitly im for it; a post count competition, u game??

 

[Bull]

Bull re-read the Adux post, where he quotes earlier post..The attitude is simply not tollerated with the combination of usual bullshit that has increased. I

U mean this.....

Comparing Full Blown Wars to Capturing individuals.Funny
Comparing Terrorist to Soldiers, Sad to hear from a Soldier Himself.
Did you retire or resign?

Where was bullshit in this?

 

[KashifAsrar]

funny thing is that you make all kinds of statements against Muslims.and make it sound like you open to Debate.as soon as anti Hindu stuff comes up you and Bulls A.s.s catches on fire and you 2 start swearing.funny isn't it.Oh you noble ones.

NO such thing as Fundamental Hindu (BJP) is there.no one in india has ever blown up any Religious buildings.Barbri Mosque comes to mind.
oH wait During khalistan Movement indian Army personal did that.RIOTS in gujrat were Rest of the worlds imagination never happend in india cause Hindus are peace loving people.they only kill when they feel like it .at other times they are very fun guys that do the disco only.Hindus dont preach hatred in there institutions Oh God no.they only have untoucables and higher cast people.as long as those people no there place there never ever is trouble.Religious tolorent in India is so examplery that no words in this world can describe it.

But i do suggest to keep your comments out of religious topics.as you cant take it but dish it out only.

Nice reply!
keep it up.
Kashif

 

[Bull]

funny thing is that you make all kinds of statements against Muslims.and make it sound like you open to Debate.as soon as anti Hindu stuff comes up you and Bulls A.s.s catches on fire and you 2 start swearing.funny isn't it.Oh you noble ones.

NO such thing as Fundamental Hindu (BJP) is there.no one in india has ever blown up any Religious buildings.Barbri Mosque comes to mind.
oH wait During khalistan Movement indian Army personal did that.RIOTS in gujrat were Rest of the worlds imagination never happend in india cause Hindus are peace loving people.they only kill when they feel like it .at other times they are very fun guys that do the disco only.Hindus dont preach hatred in there institutions Oh God no.they only have untoucables and higher cast people.as long as those people no there place there never ever is trouble.Religious tolorent in India is so examplery that no words in this world can describe it.

But i do suggest to keep your comments out of religious topics.as you cant take it but dish it out only.

Hey just post one place where we have defended the hindu fundementalists or where we have said what you claimed we have. Well bullshitting doesnt get you anywhere. Prove it. Its a challenge.