Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Launching some air strikes are not solution in Iraq the solution should be military + political to make Iraq a peaceful country for all people.
@1000, is Maliki government you support right? What's the progress?
Dude ,Iraq is destroyed completely .Virtually now it is in a disintegrated state.We cant see a pre 2003 Iraq at least for another 30 years.
airstrikes were very helpful.seems america has to bomb something to not look weak to other countries
youre right US should have bombed saudi Arabia right from the beginning. All 9/11 folks were saudis none of them was iraqi or afghan. America has not the balls to go against SA because of their dollar but we will ensure their currency collapses anyways.Amrikans at it again-
First create a mess in a country by bombing it-
Next try to save it from the mess it created by again bombing it-
All hail Amrikan democrazy-
West have allowed civil wars in ME as they may get some benefit in the end but it is destroying those countires (Lybia, Syria & Iraq).
It is up to the peoples in that country.They couldnt coordinately solve all that issue .These peoples dont interested to oppose the grand game of West .They give more priority to their religion and tribal nature than nationhood and so they like to fight each other .Once British empire did in the India subcontinent is now implementing in ME.
Sadly their leaders is also addicted to those things I mentioned and poor peoples are suffereing.
The strategy which was applied to capture India & rule by British always have worked in every part of the world if properly implemented and west knows that.
so what is your opinion ?Don't be mistaken. US wouldn't have done humanitarian help if they didn't have a self-interest. 500 Yazidi starving in the moutains is just bull. They didn't do anything when much larger people were being killed and replaced in Syria.