What's new

US Nukes to Cost $348Billion Over Next Decade

Lord ZeN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
2,483
Reaction score
15
Country
India
Location
Japan
635576176078233120-SSBN738-141016-N-LP168-095.jpg


WASHINGTON — The US government will spend an estimated $348 billion over the next decade to maintain, upgrade and operate its nuclear arsenal, according to a new estimate by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

That figure is slightly down from a Dec. 2013 estimate of $355 billion, but still represents an average price tag of $35 billion a year — major costs in an era when the Pentagon is focused on finding savings.

The Pentagon's share of the $348 billion total is estimated at $227 billion, or about $6 billion more than the 10-year estimate published in 2013. The Department of Energy's total has shrunk by $13 billion in the newer estimate, down to $121 billion.

The drop in overall cost is due in part to "budget-driven delays in several programs, including a three-year delay for the new cruise missile and its nuclear warhead and longer delays in some programs for extending the useful lives of nuclear warheads," the CBO wrote in its report, released Thursday.

The overall breakdown looks like this:



  • $160 billion for strategic nuclear delivery systems and weapons;
  • $8 billion for tactical nuclear delivery systems and weapons;
  • $79 billion for nuclear weapons laboratories and their supporting activities;
  • $52 billion for nuclear-related command, control, communications, and early-warning systems;
  • $49 billion representing CBO's estimate of additional costs that would be incurred over the coming decade if the growth rates for the nuclear program's costs are similar to the average.

Costs were estimated by looking at nuclear budget lines, examining long-range plans for each relevant program, and projecting each one out.

"Over the next two decades, the Congress will need to make decisions about the extent to which essentially all of the U.S. nuclear delivery systems and weapons will be modernized or replaced with new systems," the authors of the study wrote. Indeed, there are major upgrades planned to the bomber, nuclear submarine and ICBM fleets, something the CBO calculated into their long-term projections.

The CBO projects $40 billion to be spent on the bomber fleet during this time period, which includes an expected ramp up in the Air Force's new Long Range Strike-Bomber. The nuclear submarine forces are estimated at $83 billion over 10 years, while ICBMs will cost $26 billion over the next decade.

The command and control subcategory of systems dropped $1 billion, the result of planned reductions in costs at Strategic Command and Global Strike Command.

US Nukes Cost $348B Over Next Decade
 
Last edited:
.
maintaining our nukes and building better delivery systems is vital for our national security.
the price will never be to high for that.
 
.
I can't believe the world has not worked towards universal disarmament of nukes yet. It serves nobodies interest to have nukes proliferated around the world, even if its in the hands of only a few nations.

The US should start talking with all other Nuclear powers to start the disarmament process.
Maybe start with small increments of decommissioning nukes each year.

As China and India start to develop I think disarmament might be possible. We know the West will not nuke each other, but as China and India economically integrate with the West and each other they will have a vested interest in nuke disarmament too. Until then there's too much distrust between east and west.
 
.
I can't believe the world has not worked towards universal disarmament of nukes yet. It serves nobodies interest to have nukes proliferated around the world, even if its in the hands of only a few nations.

The US should start talking with all other Nuclear powers to start the disarmament process.
Maybe start with small increments of decommissioning nukes each year.


As China and India start to develop I think disarmament might be possible. We know the West will not nuke each other, but as China and India economically integrate with the West and each other they will have a vested interest in nuke disarmament too. Until then there's too much distrust between east and west.
Say what...???

You are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay behind the news.

Transparency in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Stockpile
Stockpile. As of September 2013, the U.S. stockpile of nuclear warheads consisted of 4,804 warheads. This number represents an 85 percent reduction in the stockpile from its maximum (31,255) at the end of fiscal year 1967, and a 78 percent reduction from its level (22,217) when the Berlin Wall fell in late 1989. The below figure shows the U.S. nuclear stockpile from 1945 through September 30, 2013.

Warhead Dismantlement. From fiscal years 1994 through 2013, the United States dismantled 9,952 nuclear warheads. Since September 30, 2009, the United States has dismantled 1,204 nuclear warheads. Several thousand additional nuclear weapons are currently retired and awaiting dismantlement.

Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons. The number of U.S. non-strategic nuclear weapons has declined by approximately 90 percent since September 30, 1991.
I know everybody like to blame US for every bit of ill on this world, but do try to verify some facts before you speak.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom