What's new

US nuclear submarine weak spot in bubble trail: Chinese scientists

meanwhile US + UK has tested tridents in over 200 live launches in the last 30 years

validating and revalidating and refining the system

JL-2 and JL-3 has been tested how many times ?

has Chinese ever conducted a deterrent patrol using SSBN in the last 60 years since it built its first nuclear submarine
 
.
If the US navy needs a hand, I could built a bubble producing decoy using only materials bought from my local hardware store to deceive the superior Chinese technology.
 
.
Duderte understand US intentions better.

Before forging an alliance beware their true intentions. - Sun Tzu

US intention is China not Philippines.
What true intentions? Philippines is a lost cause. They were once richer than Japan. Too much delusions kill them off. Chinese will take them everything away until underwear.
 
.
What true intentions? Philippines is a lost cause. They were once richer than Japan. Too much delusions kill them off. Chinese will take them everything away until underwear.
Duderte knew United States needed Philippines more than Philippines need United States.
Even though Duderte kick US out, US kept coming back begging.

Marcus on the other hand sold Philippine down the road. In exchange for the 4 new bases in Philippines, US would allow his extended family to keep the wealth stolen from people of Philippines.

SC affirms dismissal of P1.05-B ill-gotten wealth case vs Marcos Sr., others​

By JOAHNA LEI CASILAO, GMA Integrated News
Published July 19, 2023 7:29pm

The Supreme Court (SC) has affirmed the dismissal of the forfeiture case against the late President Ferdinand Marcos Sr., his wife, Imelda, and several others, involving P1.05 billion in alleged ill-gotten wealth.

In a decision promulgated on March 29, the SC First Division denied a petition seeking to reverse the Sandiganbayan’s decision that dismissed the complaint against Marcos, Imelda, Bienvenido Tantoco Jr., Bienvenido Tantoco Sr., Gliceria Tantoco, Maria Lourdes Tantoco-Pineda, and Dominador Santiago, for insufficiency of evidence.

“While it is truly disappointing that nothing has come of this case despite the lapse of 36 years spent in litigation, the Court agrees with the Sandiganbayan that petitioner’s evidence is insufficient to support the allegations of its expanded complaint by preponderance of evidence,” the Court said through Associate Justice Ricardo Rosario.

More...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom