What's new

US neutralises Pakistan's entire nuclear arsenal - on TV

Dude I don't have enemies, so don't have to burn 24/7 to destroy my enemies. You are cursed :D

I don't need fairness to look good. It's low IQ people like you who think beauty lies in fairness. Btw that's not me but my favorite actor Nawazuddin siddiqi. And yes he too don't need fair and lovely :enjoy:
Budd you are underestimating me :smokin:


Mastan sahab that was not for you educated folks.
Btw that's not even a thing here.
We are so intertwined that, we (Indians Hindu, Muslims, Sikhs, Christian, jain, Paris,....) can't live without each other.
It's part of our daily lives. So still no biggie

Hi,

What I am saying is---that this fever has taken over the world---we are not alone.
 
.
Right now with 13 sites---30 specialists attacking each site---is roughly going to need 450 specialists----and that is manageable.
Sir we love you and will miss you alot:cry::partay:

They are butthurt that why US is showing thame as what they actually think of themselves
LOL, why not complain to daddy USA, why bash India
nowadays,you seem quite upset about your rants,the quality is going into a sh** pit with each passing day,the only thing the world knows about butthurt and sanghis is that, they are synonymous:D
 
.
Sir we love you and will miss you alot:cry::partay:


nowadays,you seem quite upset about your rants,the quality is going into a sh** pit with each passing day,the only thing the world knows about butthurt and sanghis is that, they are synonymous:D


Hi,

If I stop posting---you would know what happened.
 
. .
Sir we love you and will miss you alot:cry::partay:


nowadays,you seem quite upset about your rants,the quality is going into a sh** pit with each passing day,the only thing the world knows about butthurt and sanghis is that, they are synonymous:D
My rants?? Could you please explain??
What do you mean by Shanghai?
 
. . .
Hi,

If I stop posting---you would know what happened.


I think the poster meant to say that "if after strikes we cease to read your comments".

With the increased number of sites ................... the risk of proliferation, disaster, security would increase? In addition to that Punjab and Sindh are these provinces suitable for storage sites? Would it be worth the cost and risk involved? I was only interested in threatening part like if you won't do it I would do that because you don't leave me any choice.
 
. .
You wanna know the best way to shut these people up, and shit on their ideas? Fix your economy, and grow. There is no point in getting angry, just become a strong economy, and the US will come back begging to be your "friend" again.
That's ideal solution but not easy to implement for Pakistan. Being an ideological state, it has to fight constantly to protect its ideology and thus integrity from forces hostile to their ideology
 
.
Hi,

Hollywood sometimes in its insults does us favors----. It knows that there is a plan to strike at the storage facilities---and it knows that there are a certain number of facilities---because the U S know where all our equipment is---.

So---that is why I had suggested that pak needs to build up more equipment---and as they do so---they need to build up more site---if the number of sites increase from 13 to 35---then the chance of failure is very high---for a strike operation.

Right now with 13 sites---30 specialists attacking each site---is roughly going to need 450 specialists----and that is manageable.

But if you have 30-35 sites---then as the number of sites increase---the rate of failure gets higher.

Pakistanis are only living an illusion thinking their nucs are safe---.

Agreed. There was another show which depicted a nuclear strike on Pakistan. Thing is US is paving the way for another war because that is what fuels its economy, War, we on the other hand are sitting idle doing nothing as if nothing will ever happen. I am surprised at people who makes our strategic calculus that they dont consider US a threat even when US and not India threaten to bomb us back to stone age.
Sir do you remember the incident with China in 96( though i am not sure about the year) when Clinton was the President of the US, Taiwan was about to declare independence and China was about to attack and than came the US sending its aircraft carrier. China wasn't as advance military back than as it is now and the only thing that kept from Taiwan declaring its independence and US supporting this effort was China's threat to reply with nuke in case US attacks. US backed down and so did her buddies in Taiwan. The point i am trying to make here is that unless US knows that it can receive a severe backlash, it does not back down. Look at the history of US, the only country to use nukes on a non nuclear nation, only country that attacks small countries like Vietnam, or countries like Iraq and Afghanistan because she knows no matter what the homeland is safe. None of the countries can respond back.
Thing is no matter how little the chance there is but Pakistan needs an ICBM as an assurance policy.
 
.
This is what OBAMA will say to PENTAGON

55311204.jpg
 
.
Agreed, but please don't compare Pakistani society with India.
No matter how primitive we are we can't touch the standards set by your mother country.
Nukes are the only thing Pakistanis take pride in which for us is just a powerful bomb

Not in our worst nightmares we will ever compare ourselves with your lot.....in your obsession you may talk about our Nukes but down to earth we take pride in that we can all drink from the same well. !!!
 
.
let us make a tv serial where we repulse such american attack and neutralize indian warheads :-)
 
.
Not in our worst nightmares we will ever compare ourselves with your lot.....in your obsession you may talk about our Nukes but down to earth we take pride in that we can all drink from the same well. !!!
Thank you, I already know you wears green glasses, so no point arguing with you
 
.
Back
Top Bottom