Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a joke. They have children dying left right and center in Yemen due to the siege and yet they continue to feed the devil.
Lets see what happens after a few aircraft have been flown into, say, the Great Hall of the People, August First Building, and a few other key buildings in Beijing.Because they have common sense.
Have you not seen what the West has been doing in the Middle East over the past few decades? They dropped more bombs on Iraq alone than in the entire European theater of WW2.
A million dead civilians in Iraq alone, over fake WMD. Now compare that to "rumors" that China has banned beards, which is completely false, just check any recent video taken in Xinjiang and count how many beards you see there.
As we speak, America is dropping a bomb on someone's head.
As for the US dropping more bombs on Iraq alone than in the entire European theater of WW2, pls consider the following:.
Lets see what happens after a few aircraft have been flown into, say, the Great Hall of the People, August First Building, and a few other key buildings in Beijing.
The US went into Afghanistan in 2001, right after 9/11, supported by Canada and the UK initially and later joined by the rest of NATO. Importantly, article 5 of the North Atlantic treaty, requiring member states to come to the aid of any member state subject to an armed attack, was invoked for the first and only time after the September 11 attacks, after which troops were deployed to Afghanistan under the NATO-led ISAF. Public aims of the invasion were to dismantle al-Qaeda and to deny it a safe base of operations in Afghanistan by removing the Taliban from power. I find that one perfectly justifiable.But what does that have to do with invading Iraq over fake WMDs, leading to the deaths of over a million Iraqi civilians? Invading Aghanistan, invading Libya, bombing Syria?
Well to be honest, the US has also sustained significant loss of life over the past century. But those, like China's losses are not at all relevant to the discussion.And China has had more than its fair share of suffering, losing 3000 people is terrible but we've had to deal with losing tens of millions in many different conflicts over the past two centuries.
Sir i would like to disagree with you on this front ... we act as front state of usa in war against terror and paid a humonongus price in terms of terrorism .. afghan refuges unstable borders and econmic cost ... at that time had we opted to shake hand with soviet union and tried to remain neutral instead of becoming active part of cold war we probably could have a better industrial base and our economy might have been slight better ...Hi,
Saudis are taking care of the business that should have been taken care by pak military if they had sent 150k troops some 2 years ago to the GCC.
So---just imagine the loss Gen Raheel incured on pakistan---. That alliance in itself could have been worth 100 to 200 billion dollars for a 5 - 8 years period---.
This is a slap on the face of pak military decision makers.
Sir i would like to disagree with you on this front ... we act as front state of usa in war against terror and paid a humonongus price in terms of terrorism .. afghan refuges unstable borders and econmic cost ... at that time had we opted to shake hand with soviet union and tried to remain neutral instead of becoming active part of cold war we probably could have a better industrial base and our economy might have been slight better ...
I am of the view that economic social and political cost of war is much higher than the benefits we will get ...
I am in favour of following the hardway of self reliance rather than being opportunist ... although our establishment and gov are not moving in any direction but right direction is self reliance ...
I dont understand we always seek for help ... we are not small country ... we are a huge country 7th largest population with mostly young folks ... our real investment needs to be in these people ... it will take time to realize the benefits but it is ultimate solution not to look for saudi, china and usa for help ...
Remember we have the brain to convert a desert into uae ... we have brain to create emirates ... we can do the same again but only need to remove corruption from the system ... we need to build ourselves as a nation and then we will not need anyone esle for help ..
Let's look at it from a different perspective.. The US/NATO would have loved to push for a KSA/GCC vs Iran prolonged war that would cost more than a trillion dollars, this would have allowed western weapons factories to go full gear and would have benefited the west mostly, while at the same time weakening KSA and its Sunni Allies and Iran and its Shia' allies, in other words; weakening the whole Muslim world in one go and without any western nation having to fight or lose lives.. to the contrary the West would be making hundreds of billions in arms sales anyway..It looks like a new norm - a 100b down payment before any further talks!!! Good job President Trump!!! Now, what chances other folks have????
KSA.....Israel?
Let's look at it from a different perspective.. The US/NATO would have loved to push for a KSA/GCC vs Iran prolonged war that would cost more than a trillion dollars, this would have allowed western weapons factories to go full gear and would have benefited the west mostly, while at the same time weakening KSA and its Sunni Allies and Iran and its Shia' allies, in other words; weakening the whole Muslim world in one go and without any western nation having to fight or lose lives.. to the contrary the West would be making hundreds of billions in arms sales anyway..
So I think it is a smart move to pay a few hundred Billions of dollars, get the best weapons for it, avoid a devastating war between Muslims, protect oneself as best as one can, benefit the Mafia boss (US) the most, get his added protection and benefit technologically and scientifically from it.. Keep progressing instead of regressing..
Agree thia they could have approached our defence companies for a similar to deal which i believe our leaders would have lobbied our defence companies for a better compromise on TOT than the U SAmericans are well known for their extremely limited tech transfer. Why are Saudis buying American hardware why not British products? The Brits are much more willing to share knowledge. It's election time in the UK and Brexit negotiations are ongoing. May would do anything to announce a 100b USD deal.
Saudi Arabia is not going to change, they're making constantly the same strategic failures over and over again...
New Recruit
11 new Corvettes/frigates Lsc, 14 destroyers (arleight burke), thaad, 24 sea hawk anti submarine helicopters, 6 p-8 poseidon's, mq-8b unknown number,logistic ships, 3 landing ship platform's
Ah sunni Shia war can also destroy Fabric of Islamic Nations and can cause permanent decide between Sunni and Shia muslims.Well, there is already an indirect (sectarian?) war going on between Saudi and Iran, if it turns into a "hot war" that could spell enormous devastation for the region and the global economy. So hopefully they take it easy there.
But, here [KSA/GCC + Turkey + Pak] vs Iran when Ebraha vs Ebabil is concerned!!!!!Having the best tech equipment will not make you win a war in anyway... it will only give you the opportunity to end it fast otherwise you are screwed in the long term...
If those Hundreds of Bill$ come with limited or no ToT then it's like doing nothing... Iran has some sort of Def industry and they proved to be quite knowledgeable in few areas... where KSA is lacking by decades away... meaning if a War broke btw GCC/Iran (only with no allies intervention) then Iran has quite the upper hand... with a Def industry ready to kick... and a Army pool bigger than all GCC combined...
But the most likely scenario if a war broke btw them... you will get mostly an abdiction or lose of Iran... since allies will be involved...