What's new

US & NATO Leaving Afghanistan Requires Pak Support to Take Back Their Stuff

Air Wolf

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Saudi Arabia
US and NATO will require Pakistan's support if they want to take back their precious cargo. It will not be some trucks only. Tons and tons of precious cargo to take back. Requires road access through Pakistan, require safety en route, requires port access...As it has been happening time and again, universe has dealt an enormously powerful hand to Pakistan.

Zalmay Khalilzad along with Commander Resolute Support Mission Afghanistan General Austin Scott Miller met General Bajwa. Immediately after that the Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) UK Army, General Sir Nicholas Patrick Carter, called on Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa. Things have started to pick up pace.

Let's hope that this time the people who are making this deal from ourside doesn't sell their selves short and get whatever we want from US.


 
. . . .
Pakistan doesn't have as free a hand as you seem to think. There is a reason why Pakistan has continued to provide access to its GLOC and ALOC to the US and ISAF forces, despite having multiple excuses to cut off access.

In the long term, Pakistan may be better off helping the US quickly exit, without making too much of a fuss.
 
.
They could sell us all this stuff, no need to take it back.........


they actually wanted to sell this to India and we said they could not use our borders for that, maybe Iran or Russia would agree
K
 
.
US and NATO will require Pakistan's support if they want to take back their precious cargo. It will not be some trucks only. Tons and tons of precious cargo to take back. Requires road access through Pakistan, require safety en route, requires port access...As it has been happening time and again, universe has dealt an enormously powerful hand to Pakistan.

Zalmay Khalilzad along with Commander Resolute Support Mission Afghanistan General Austin Scott Miller met General Bajwa. Immediately after that the Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) UK Army, General Sir Nicholas Patrick Carter, called on Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa. Things have started to pick up pace.

Let's hope that this time the people who are making this deal from ourside doesn't sell their selves short and get whatever we want from US.


If NLC does this shipping then why not.
 
.
Please do not play double game here. Believe me it will reflect, if we in Afghanistan could, we can prevent them from taking anything, even towards Pakistan, we are not the Afghanistan of 1990s. I request Pakistan to let them take their assets safely back, we’d like to show them that this is our Ghairat, something they don’t have, the very same thing that overpowered them in these 20 long years. This is after all what Rasool’Allah has taught us.
 
.
US and NATO will require Pakistan's support if they want to take back their precious cargo. It will not be some trucks only. Tons and tons of precious cargo to take back. Requires road access through Pakistan, require safety en route, requires port access...As it has been happening time and again, universe has dealt an enormously powerful hand to Pakistan.

Zalmay Khalilzad along with Commander Resolute Support Mission Afghanistan General Austin Scott Miller met General Bajwa. Immediately after that the Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) UK Army, General Sir Nicholas Patrick Carter, called on Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa. Things have started to pick up pace.

Let's hope that this time the people who are making this deal from ourside doesn't sell their selves short and get whatever we want from US.



OR the US could just gift it all to the Afghans and tribals as part of the peace deal and leave.
Edit and add...remember the USA has unlimited money. They can buy and produce anything. If some advanced weapons and cash for both sides of the Afghan conflict make them feel safer and the exit easier then makes sense for the USA.
 
Last edited:
. .
US and NATO will require Pakistan's support if they want to take back their precious cargo. It will not be some trucks only. Tons and tons of precious cargo to take back. Requires road access through Pakistan, require safety en route, requires port access...As it has been happening time and again, universe has dealt an enormously powerful hand to Pakistan.

Zalmay Khalilzad along with Commander Resolute Support Mission Afghanistan General Austin Scott Miller met General Bajwa. Immediately after that the Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) UK Army, General Sir Nicholas Patrick Carter, called on Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa. Things have started to pick up pace.

Let's hope that this time the people who are making this deal from ourside doesn't sell their selves short and get whatever we want from US.



Good ... now let them feel that need a bit more and watch them squirm. Salalah has not been forgotten.
 
.
Somehow Pak manages to "steal" the limelight!!! Despite weeping and crying of the Indians:
  • The KSA/UAE now need Pak more than ever before
  • Turkey badly needs Pak
  • Chinese ambitions pass through Pak
  • The US folks will need Pak till the end
US needing Pakistan is a short to medium term requirement. Pakistan US relationship should be decoupled from Afghanistan & we need to have a trade & security related framework with the US.
 
.
Pakistan doesn't have as free a hand as you seem to think. There is a reason why Pakistan has continued to provide access to its GLOC and ALOC to the US and ISAF forces, despite having multiple excuses to cut off access.

In the long term, Pakistan may be better off helping the US quickly exit, without making too much of a fuss.
Yes we should definitely not ask for a specific cash amount. But if there is a cost for providing support and their access to our facilities, we should ask for that reasonable price though - but not like give us aid and blah blah. We should however focus on building goodwill, avoiding unnecessary negative actions from their side and try to clear any diplomatic holdups - such as release of t129 engines, fatf, imf program etc.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom