What's new

US must be involved in Afghanistan after troops leave: Pakistan

5e215b9edd671.jpg


Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi on Thursday said United States must remain engaged in Afghanistan's reconstruction even if it succeeds in withdrawing troops and ending its longest war.

The foreign minister is currently in the United States on the third leg of his mission to defuse tensions in the Middle East, having already visited Tehran and Riyadh as part of Pakistan's diplomatic efforts.

Speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, Qureshi said: "Peace in Afghanistan is ultimately a shared responsibility and Pakistan [...] alone cannot do all that is needed".

The foreign minister warned the US not to neglect Afghanistan, as was seen after 1989 when Soviet troops pulled out under pressure from guerrillas fighters backed by Washington and Islamabad.

"Do not repeat the '80s," he said, adding: "Even if there is a successful agreement, challenges will remain there, so the United States and its friends and coalition partners will have to have a more responsible withdrawal.

"They should remain engaged — not to fight, but to rebuild."

Qureshi said he has seen a willingness from the Taliban to reduce the violence.

"They are pragmatic and not foolish. They are also fatigued," he said.

The foreign minister is set to meet US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo today on the growing momentum toward a deal between the United States and the Taliban.

Meanwhile, discussing the situation in occupied Kashmir, Qureshi said Pakistan wanted a solution of the Kashmir dispute in accordance with the United Nations' resolutions and the aspirations of Kashmiris, Radio Pakistan reported.

According to Radio Pakistan, Qureshi said India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had "misled" the international community about the Pulwama incident and "construed Pakistan's desire for peace as its weakness", adding that Pakistan only wants "peace for development".

Qureshi meets US lawmakers
Qureshi also held meetings with a host of US lawmakers from the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday. The lawmakers included Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee Senator Mitt Romney, Senator Chris Murphy and Senator Jim Risch.


Qureshi said he discussed Pakistan's contribution to the Afghan peace process, recent tensions in the Middle East and India's illegal lockdownn in occupied Kashmir.


The foreign minister also held a meeting with US Under Secretary of Defence John Rood, the Foreign Office said in a statement.

In the meeting, Qureshi told Rood that Pakistan is "deeply concerned about prospects of any instability in its neighbourhood and [remains] ready to play its due role in finding a peaceful solution to the tensions between US and Iran".

Qureshi informed Rood about his recent visits to Tehran and Riyadh and stressed the need for de-escalation and dialogue, a statement released by the Foreign Office said.

"Defence and security cooperation has been one of the defining features of our bilateral cooperation.

"The US decision to revive the International Military Education and Training programme for Pakistan had significant symbolic value and was a welcome first step in further reviving bilateral military cooperation," he said.

During the meeting, the two discussed various aspects of the Pakistan-US defence cooperation as well as the evolving regional situation.

According to the statement, Rood briefed the foreign minister about ongoing defence-related cooperation between the two countries.

Meanwhile, Qureshi brought the US undersecretary for defence up to speed on Pakistan's efforts for peace and stability in South Asia, the statement added.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1528884/u...er-troops-leave-fm-qureshi-says-in-washington
After USAs withdrawal, I am afraid, will come embargoes. USA better not leave Afghanistan.
 
.
Beautiful analysis, Ali!

Simple, elegant and to the core of the matter!


I guess we need to translate what Pakistan is Partner is Peace Only: It means... Peace on Pakistan's Terms..and Only on Pakistan's Terms...


I, sincerely, hope that The Thrid Strategic Relief that we are about to provide to the superpowers has a hefty price tag for them..instead of us..which we have paid dearly in the first Two Strategic Reliefs.

Mangus

P.S. Ali pay my kind regards and deep affection to our mutual friend, please!
Jinnah got an upper hand to negotiate for Pak for he was prudent enough to support the Allied Power during WW2!! A known enemy is better than an unknown friend.....

First, PMIK gives lecture on American taxepayer's money not well spent...and now... of all people SMQ is telling the Yanks to be responsible... right on Fox...

Oh... Pakistan is so isolated!
Forget about the White supremists, the Muslims in India and BD put their heads 10 feet under the ground just for the introductory bow to greet their Hindu masters in this world and the next....

These are the dividends of having a functioning FM. You have to the ask former regime of Nawaz Shareef as to why he didn't have the FM and Pakistan voice and point of view got muzzled at international stage during his tenure.
They were sent to kill Pak from inside!! What else do you expect?!?
 
.
Jinnah got an upper hand to negotiate for Pak for he was prudent enough to support the Allied Power during WW2!! A known enemy is better than an unknown friend.....


Forget about the White supremists, the Muslims in India and BD put their heads 10 feet under the ground just for the introductory bow to greet their Hindu masters in this world and the next....


They were sent to kill Pak from inside!! What else do you expect?!?
Mark my words... for all I know ... When Afghan king presented Afghanistan in merger with Pakistan... He(Jinnah) would have taken it ... he for how ever short his life was after the Brits left ... never let Kashmir go the way subsequent Pakistanis did...
 
.
US involvement in Afghanistan will be limited to counter-terrorism. Nothing more. No more nation-building for US. Too much has been spent on a regime that is both corrupt and incompetent. It's time for regional players to foot the bill (i.e. China).

Nevertheless, Afghanistan will never see peace and neither will Pakistan. Whoever is in charge of Kabul, Taliban or not, will be a constant thorn in Pakistan's side.
 
.
Mark my words... for all I know ... When Afghan king presented Afghanistan in merger with Pakistan... He(Jinnah) would have taken it ... he for how ever short his life was after the Brits left ... never let Kashmir go the way subsequent Pakistanis did...
When the British Establishment folks were visiting India in 1910s to talk about the Dominion status of India they got amazed at the statesman like acumen of Jinnah which none of the other members in the Indian delegation had!!! Yes, he was a leader you won’t mess with....
 
.
US involvement in Afghanistan will be limited to counter-terrorism. Nothing more. No more nation-building for US. Too much has been spent on a regime that is both corrupt and incompetent. It's time for regional players to foot the bill (i.e. China).

Nevertheless, Afghanistan will never see peace and neither will Pakistan. Whoever is in charge of Kabul, Taliban or not, will be a constant thorn in Pakistan's side.




Sure sure. Just like you indians also claimed that you will become a superpower before 2020, that the iaf killed exactly 350 terrorists in Balakot and shot down an F-16..........:lol:
 
.
Beautiful analysis, Ali!

Simple, elegant and to the core of the matter!


I guess we need to translate what Pakistan is Partner is Peace Only: It means... Peace on Pakistan's Terms..and Only on Pakistan's Terms...


I, sincerely, hope that The Thrid Strategic Relief that we are about to provide to the superpowers has a hefty price tag for them..instead of us..which we have paid dearly in the first Two Strategic Reliefs.

Mangus

P.S. Ali pay my kind regards and deep affection to our mutual friend, please!
he is out of touch since two weeks but he misses everyone and he has been away
 
.
US is in Afghanistan to take care of Pakistan... they aren't going any where!
 
.
we r in no hurry all roads to kabul goes through us
they r depending on us for everything wht they spend in afghanistan economy will end up in pakistani markets
why should we pray americans leave when we have all the cards in our hands
now all we want is a share of power in kabul for taliban and they still get to keep the areas under there control which is well above 50%
we will see to it that no hanky panky is done this time around
so for an extra measure we fenced the border just in case someone wana try another time
but they have lost the war
now its all about spoils
who own it
and we want americans to keep spending
keep muddying the waters so we keep on our game
huge surprise will come from north this time
You're right.

I initially thought qureishi was chatting nonsense as I often think he does.

But it's probable that - as per your insinuation - Pakistan would prefer USA to remain in this indeterminate state, never quite winning in Afghanistan but never being able to pack up and draw a line under it.

Luckily, the ANA remain so incompetent that the USA will remain unable to fully withdraw for many years to come.
 
.
After USAs withdrawal, I am afraid, will come embargoes. USA better not leave Afghanistan.
Why US embargo pak???

US is in Afghanistan to take care of Pakistan... they aren't going any where!
Hameed Gul back in action.

I feel door is opening up for Pak both military and economic from west and US and it will be long term. Pak should paly cards wisely and get max benefits from this opportunity. US Pak relationships is as important as Pak China relationship so US and CPEC will go hand in hand

US involvement in Afghanistan will be limited to counter-terrorism. Nothing more. No more nation-building for US. Too much has been spent on a regime that is both corrupt and incompetent. It's time for regional players to foot the bill (i.e. China).

Nevertheless, Afghanistan will never see peace and neither will Pakistan. Whoever is in charge of Kabul, Taliban or not, will be a constant thorn in Pakistan's side.
US will do reconstruction in Afghanistan for them its an opportunity to salvage money they spent in Afghanistan.
 
.
Why US embargo pak???
Just to keep Pakistan, and of course others, under tight control.
Basically, that's the strategy, against which China proved to be their father.
Chinese were and are right when it comes to West.
 
.
Just to keep Pakistan, and of course others, under tight control.
Basically, that's the strategy, against which China proved to be their father.
Chinese were and are right when it comes to West.
Wrong assumption nothing more.
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom