What's new

US moves to harness India to anti-China “pivot”

$@rJen

BANNED
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
6,326
Reaction score
-21
Country
India
Location
Israel
US moves to harness India to anti-China “pivot”
Published March 9, 2016
SOURCE: WSWS.ORG

encirclement_0_3_opt.jpg


The head of the US Pacific Command, Admiral Harry Harris, gave a highly provocative speech in New Delhi last week in which he laid out the “next steps” in Washington’s strategic agenda for India. Claiming to be “a bit moonstruck…by the opportunities a strategic partnership with India” provide, Harris said he envisioned the US and Indian navies jointly patrolling the Indian and Pacific Oceans in “the not too distant future.”

He also urged India to form a quadrilateral security “dialogue” with the US and its closest military allies in the Asian-Pacific region, Japan and Australia.

Later the same day, Admiral Harris proposed that the recently established annual trilateral Indo-US-Japanese naval exercise take place off the northeast shore of the Philippines, just outside the South China Sea—a contested region where the US has been encouraging its allies to press their territorial claims against China.

In sum, Harris urged India to become a “frontline state” in the US drive to strategically isolate, encircle and potentially wage war against China.

By virtually any measure, India is a poor country. But US imperialist strategists, including the Pentagon war planners, have been touting it as a “strategic prize” since the beginning of the 21st century. The efforts to harness India to US imperialism’s predatory global agenda, through a combination of threats and poison-chaliced inducements, have greatly intensified since the Obama administration announced its anti-China “pivot” in 2011.

US strategists covet India for multiple reasons. It is the second largest of the world’s “emerging economies.” It has a huge military, armed with nuclear weapons and a rapidly expanding blue-water navy. From a geostrategic standpoint, it dominates South Asia (the Indian subcontinent), providing a potential base of operations for projecting US power across much of Eurasia, including towards neighbouring China and the energy-rich Middle East and Central Asia.

Last but not least, India protrudes far into the Indian Ocean, providing easy access to the entire northern half of that ocean, which, as a recent US Naval War College-sponsored study notes, “has replaced the North Atlantic as the central artery of world commerce.”

The strategists of US imperialism view dominance of the Indian Ocean as essential to US global hegemony. First and foremost, because it is at the heart of US plans to impose an economic blockade on China through strategic maritime “chokepoints” in the event of war or war crisis. But also because the Indian Ocean is a key staging ground for US military operations in the Middle East and East Africa.

In pursuit of its own great-power ambitions, the Indian bourgeoisie has tilted ever more decisively toward Washington, even as the US has emerged as an incendiary power that wages illegal wars and otherwise violates national sovereignty and precepts of international law at will.

The Congress Party-led government that ruled Indian from 2004 to 2014 entered into a “global strategic partnership” with Washington, helped legitimize its efforts to isolate and bully Iran, and rapidly expanded ties between the Indian military and the Pentagon, including weapons purchases.

In the 22 months during which Narendra Modi and his Hindu supremacist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have formed India’s government, New Delhi has integrated itself ever more fully into Washington’s strategic offensive against China.

This has included:

  • Joining Washington in painting China as the aggressor in the South China Sea, although it is the US that, in the name of “freedom of navigation,” is arrogating to itself the right to patrol China’s shores and to have in place the naval might to quickly seize the Straits of Malacca and other strategic chokepoints;
  • Expanding bilateral and trilateral military-security cooperation, including military exercises and strategic planning, with the US, Japan and Australia;
  • Collaborating across South Asia in countering Chinese influence, including in the January 2015 regime-change operation in Sri Lanka that saw Mahinda Rajapaksa replaced by a president ready to degrade Colombo’s ties with Beijing and launch a security “dialogue” with Washington.
Harris’s New Delhi speech was aimed at stoking suspicions and inflaming tensions between India and China, the better to bind New Delhi to America’s strategic agenda. It is part of an unrelenting campaign to force China to forgo any challenge to US global hegemony.

Earlier last week, Harris ordered an aircraft carrier-led US Navy strike force to enter the South China Sea. This week, the US and South Korea launched their largest ever Korean Peninsula war game, and did so on the basis of a new operational plan that provides for pre-emptive strikes on North Korea and the occupation of the North up to the Chinese border.

It took Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar a full two days to respond to Harris’s speech, indicating that the BJP government was taken aback by the admiral’s public airing of Washington’s “asks” of India. Parrikar rebuffed the suggestion that India will mount joint navy patrols with the US, but in a manner that very much left the door open to such a possibility in the future.

The BJP has already reversed the decision taken by the previous government and supported by India’s military-security establishment to reject three agreements the Pentagon considers “foundational” for joint action with foreign militaries. The agreements had been rejected on the grounds that they threatened Indian sovereignty and security.

According to press reports, when US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter travels to India next month he will sign at least one of these—a Logistics Support Agreement (LSA) giving the US military routine access to Indian ports and naval bases, including for refuelling. The LSA’s importance is underlined by the comment of a high-level Indian official who last December said that the only remaining hitch in giving the US military access to Indian bases was, “What happens in the case of war?”

The burgeoning military-strategic alliance between US imperialism and the Indian bourgeoisie constitutes a huge threat to the masses of South Asia and the world.

Washington is drawing on the political and military support given it by New Delhi to recklessly pursue a confrontation with nuclear-armed China, a course which, whether deliberately or through miscalculation, threatens to ignite a world war.

The Indian bourgeoisie, for its part, is using the enhanced diplomatic, military and geopolitical power it derives from its junior partnership with Washington to pursue its longstanding goal of imposing itself as the regional hegemon of South Asia. Under the BJP, India has aggressively asserted its interests with all its neighbours, including building new military installations along the disputed border with Pakistan and instructing army commanders in the disputed Kashmir region to be more militarily assertive. Last year saw the worst border clashes between India and its nuclear-armed rival, Pakistan, in more than a decade.

Pakistan has repeatedly warned that Washington’s strategic embrace of India has overturned the balance of power in South Asia, fuelling an arms race—warnings the US has cavalierly ignored. These warning have become shriller in the past year due to the strengthening of the Indo-US alliance and Modi’s efforts to bully Pakistan. Militarily, Pakistan has responded by announcing the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons, and politically, by seeking closer ties to China.

Aware that the US was intent on harnessing India against it, Beijing long sought to avoid antagonizing India and attempted to enlist it as a partner in its land and sea Eurasian transport initiatives. But with Modi integrating India into Washington’s anti-China “pivot,” Beijing has moved to place Pakistan at the center of its plans to circumvent America’s “chokehold” strategy, announcing that it will invest $46 billion in a Pakistan Economic Corridor linking western China with the Pakistani Arabian Sea post Gwadar.

The US, which has used the Pakistani elite and Pakistani military as satraps in its geopolitical machinations for the past six decades, is not about to cede Pakistan to China. The axis between the Pentagon and Pakistan’s military is a source of continuing mistrust and friction between New Delhi and Washington.

Nevertheless, Washington’s strategic offensive against China and its drive to make India the south-western pillar of its anti-China “pivot” have an incendiary geopolitical logic: the US-China conflict is becoming ever more entwined with the reactionary geopolitical conflict between India and Pakistan, adding to each a highly explosive new dimension.

As the International Committee of the Fourth International explained in its statement “Socialism and the Fight Against War,” published last month, the only progressive basis on which to oppose Washington’s insane attempt to uphold US global hegemony through aggression and war is to counterpoise to the imperialists’ war map the map of the class struggle—that is, the building of a global working-class movement against war on the basis of a socialist and internationalist program.

Posted in India
 
.
India should form close military relations with Japan, South Korea and Australia, but it shouldn't be against any country including China.
 
. .
It will be a bad move. But this can only happen in Congress rule.
46024751.jpg
 
.
Hypocritical. I don't think you believe what you wrote.

There is nothing hypocritical. I believe that defense should be for security of one's country than something to do with hegemony. Military alliance against someone is hegemony.
 
. .
There is nothing hypocritical. I believe that defense should be for security of one's country than something to do with hegemony. Military alliance against someone is hegemony.

Against someone IS what military alliance is for. That is why your founding father had a non-alliance policy to begin with.

Ideologically or historically we have no animosity against China or her people except for a minor border dispute but since China is playing the same game in our backyard these developments are inevitable to secure national interest.


Here we go. It is "all your fault" type of game. At least you are honest.
 
. .
So given the thread headline, sinister Admiral Harris is doing his country's bidding in "harnessing" India...........by giving a speech at India's invitation? Wow, pretty nefarious stuff there! :)

India should form close military relations with Japan, South Korea and Australia, but it shouldn't be against any country including China.
Most importantly with Taiwan as well :)
It would be pretty difficult to have close military relations with all those countries but not the United States as America has long standing defence pacts and deep military ties, with all of them.
 
. .
Hypocritical. I don't think you believe what you wrote.

Most Indian strategic thinkers look at China as a threat only so far as the border dispute is solved. Is there a threat perception? Yes, there is. The fear is tomorrow there could be a two front war, where China gets pulled in when there is a conflict with Pakistan.

It is in the strategic interests of China to have a route to the Middle East. What you tend to forget is, if the border dispute is resolved, where we settle that Aksai Chin is part of China and Arunachal Pradesh is part of India, you demarcate the rest and move on. This is one border you will not have a problem with. The Tibetans will not be allowed to wage war against the Chinese state, that is a given. This is a safe border and you concentrate on dealing with the problems on the eastern and southern borders.

You will, now, have no worry in your complete western flank. You will also have a route right through India to both Kolkata and Gujarat/Mumbai. Chinese are being invited to lay down infrastructure. And none of this will need to be provided free. They will be paid for. You have good relations with the Russians, Iranians and Saudis. So do we. Hell, we have good relations even with the Israelis. Trade between our two countries is not going to slow down.

Also, understand Indians do not trust the Americans. Hell, we never fully trusted the Russians or French and they are the closest to what we call ally. Coming to the topic of the South China Sea, Indian interests is in ensuring our economic interests in that area are protected and our ships are allowed to pass through without problems.

Will we conduct exercises with the USN, JMDF and RAN? Yes, why not? Have we entered into any military alliances till day? Yes. Only 1. With Oman and that is not a threat to you. Understand this. Your western flank is the least of your worries. We prefer doing business with the Chinese, rather than get into a ruckus.

@Nihonjin1051 @TaiShang @Chinese-Dragon
 
.
@Dungeness Why getting serious bro?
India has never fell too deep in such issues. Why will be take trouble now? :D
Indian Power is expanding and we need someone bigger to corporate with us till we get mature like China. Nothing else. :)
India will never interfere in South China Sea for the sake of friendship with US. If it involves, then, that also gonna be for its bid in IOR because China's win in SCS could give them stronger bid in IOR.
 
.
Most Indian strategic thinkers look at China as a threat only so far as the border dispute is solved. Is there a threat perception? Yes, there is. The fear is tomorrow there could be a two front war, where China gets pulled in when there is a conflict with Pakistan.

It is in the strategic interests of China to have a route to the Middle East. What you tend to forget is, if the border dispute is resolved, where we settle that Aksai Chin is part of China and Arunachal Pradesh is part of India, you demarcate the rest and move on. This is one border you will not have a problem with. The Tibetans will not be allowed to wage war against the Chinese state, that is a given. This is a safe border and you concentrate on dealing with the problems on the eastern and southern borders.

You will, now, have no worry in your complete western flank. You will also have a route right through India to both Kolkata and Gujarat/Mumbai. Chinese are being invited to lay down infrastructure. And none of this will need to be provided free. They will be paid for. You have good relations with the Russians, Iranians and Saudis. So do we. Hell, we have good relations even with the Israelis. Trade between our two countries is not going to slow down.

Also, understand Indians do not trust the Americans. Hell, we never fully trusted the Russians or French and they are the closest to what we call ally. Coming to the topic of the South China Sea, Indian interests is in ensuring our economic interests in that area are protected and our ships are allowed to pass through without problems.

Will we conduct exercises with the USN, JMDF and RAN? Yes, why not? Have we entered into any military alliances till day? Yes. Only 1. With Oman and that is not a threat to you. Understand this. Your western flank is the least of your worries. We prefer doing business with the Chinese, rather than get into a ruckus.

@Nihonjin1051 @TaiShang @Chinese-Dragon

For USN, the question is not whether or not India will be an ally for US, but rather will India remain neutral in the power struggle between US and China in the West Pacific.

The problem is, we don't need to ally with anyone else in order to pivot our concern in Asia. We have quite a lot of traditional allies and their support will be more than enough. The question, however, more focus on how India would react shall US increase hostilities with China in the South China Seas?

Traditional wisdom suggest that the US only need India to control their own part of the Indian Ocean, you don't need to let US use any of your facilities, as long as you don't allow China to do so as well. The Objective for US is and always is to have India stay neutral in all this, and if we are going to develop a relationship over it, fine, if not? That's okay too.

Do remember the US pivot to Asia concern the first and second Island chain, which there are traditionally no IN present, so, if this is the case, why would US wanted to Allies with India if there were not much IN present in that area to begin with??
 
.
It would be pretty difficult to have close military relations with all those countries but not the United States as America has long standing defence pacts and deep military ties, with all of them.

India is not interested in having any kind of unified defense pact such as NATO with any of the above country including US. What India will be interested is India becoming a preeminent military power in Indian Ocean Region. If US, Japan or South Korea can help there, it is great and it is also in their interest.
 
.
For USN, the question is not whether or not India will be an ally for US, but rather will India remain neutral in the power struggle between US and China in the West Pacific.

The problem is, we don't need to ally with anyone else in order to pivot our concern in Asia. We have quite a lot of traditional allies and their support will be more than enough. The question, however, more focus on how India would react shall US increase hostilities with China in the South China Seas?

Traditional wisdom suggest that the US only need India to control their own part of the Indian Ocean, you don't need to let US use any of your facilities, as long as you don't allow China to do so as well. The Objective for US is and always is to have India stay neutral in all this, and if we are going to develop a relationship over it, fine, if not? That's okay too.

Do remember the US pivot to Asia concern the first and second Island chain, which there are traditionally no IN present, so, if this is the case, why would US wanted to Allies with India if there were not much IN present in that area to begin with??

You can be assured we do not want any part of the power struggle between either US or China. And till date, we have not allied with anybody. Our current problems are internal. We need infrastructure, jobs and economic prosperity. For this, we will work with everybody who will invest and reap benefits of the same. Be that US, China, Israel, Saudi or Japan.

My post was more to tell the Chinese, that, because we work with the Americans does not make us anti-Chinese or in the US camp. Why do I say this? The LSA is a given. It may be edited and a few chinks removed. But it will happen between the US and India. About the other 2, I am not so sure.

About a flare up in the South China Sea. We are neither present there, nor do we have force projection capability for the same. When have you ever seen India take any active part in a military operation, except if it was in Maldives or Sri Lanka. Our foreign policy is to issue vague statements. Not take sides. No troops unless UN asks us to. Hell, you will not find us getting involved even if you go to war with Pakistan. We will be in the sidelines saying, refugee mess.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom