What's new

'US may intervene if LeT triggers Indo-Pak war'

xataxsata

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
997
Reaction score
0
'US may intervene if LeT triggers Indo-Pak war'

The Lashkar-e-Tayiba and other Pakistani terror groups having links with the Al Qaeda may pose a danger to the United States with their ability to trigger a major crisis for nuclear-armed Pakistan, including a war with India, which may require US intervention.

With Osama bin Laden dead, and only a small number of Al Qaeda operatives in Pakistan and Afghanistan, some US leaders are talking up the threat of other militant outfits in the region, The Christian Science Monitor reports.

Such talk appears aimed at convincing critics why significant US forces must remain in the region at a time of war fatigue, the report said.

"The key is making sure there are no safe havens for those transnational terrorist groups in Afghanistan," General David Petraeus told a reporter days after bin Laden's death.

By tallying up terror groups like the LeT, the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan and the Haqqani Network, the number of "transnational terrorists" rises from just a few hundred Al Qaeda militants to thousands of violent extremists to keep an eye on.

These three groups, having links with Al Qaeda, have yet to demonstrate much determination and success at striking in the US or Europe, but they could pose a present danger to the US for their ability to trigger a major crisis for nuclear-armed Pakistan, including a war with India, the report said.

"We have concerns about them attacking India because that's the most likely way that we are going to get an India-Pakistan crisis," said C Christine Fair, a regional expert at Georgetown University in Washington.

The LeT, a Pakistani group, historically focused on India- chose targets in the 2008 Mumbai massacre that were designed to kill not just Indians, but also Jews and Westerners, the report said.

Adding to the international dimension, American LeT operative David Headley travelled to Mumbai to plan the attack for the group.

According to Headley, the LeT also paid for him to travel to Denmark to plan an attack on a newspaper there, but Pakistan's premier spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, pressured the group to shelve the attack, the report added.

"That LeT's leadership contemplated an attack against Denmark is significant, but so too is the fact that it remained susceptible to ISI pressure," LeT expert Stephen Tankel wrote for the New America Foundation.

While most experts see the LeT as focused on India, especially the Kashmir region, many worry that another major attack against India would prompt a military conflict requiring US intervention.

'US may intervene if LeT triggers Indo-Pak war' - Rediff.com News
 
.
Even good leaders like MMS cannot prevent a war or atleast conflict in case of another Mumbai Like attack. So america should take care of pakistan nukes and terrorist groups in it.
 
.
I reckon the main problem is LET having links with government agency as ISI mean it could be slightly easier for them to get nukes and it worries USA.
 
.
Even good leaders like MMS cannot prevent a war or atleast conflict in case of another Mumbai Like attack. So america should take care of pakistan nukes and terrorist groups in it.

War can be prevented. Its difficult but no impossible.
Mutual trust should be laid by increasing trade, sports, tourism, etc.
State should enforce strict laws against those speaking ill of Pakistan, spreading anti-Pakistan views. Friendly feelings must be supported.
People should be made aware of consequences of a war (that could turn nuclear) and affects of a failed/destablized neighbourhood. Same should be taught to the masses by the Govt. across the border.

An Indo-Pak war is what these monsters want. And the media, the public pressure is keen on providing what they need.

The current democratic Pak Govt. will take some time to tame the ISI and Army and anti-India elements (though I am dissappointed they did not even bother to initiate the process) coz they too have emense pressure and a lot of other priorities (Yet they find time to look into Kashmir sounds intresting to me).

People should understand that India may win over pakistan in a conventional conflict but their are no winners in a nuclear war. Even if India run over Pak forces in a limited coventional war, the destablized western neighbour and probably an angered China would become a grave concern for India.
 
. .
Yes they may intervene

bt they will follow the USSR fate.

they will end up like USSR into many nation
 
. .
Yes they may intervene

bt they will follow the USSR fate.

they will end up like USSR into many nation


Like USSR broke into Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kirghistan, etc ..US will break into Philadephistan,Texasistan, Chicagistan etc .. right?:what:


Between was that the reason for USSR breaking up.. :lol:
 
. .
War can be prevented. Its difficult but no impossible.
Mutual trust should be laid by increasing trade, sports, tourism, etc.
State should enforce strict laws against those speaking ill of Pakistan, spreading anti-Pakistan views. Friendly feelings must be supported.
People should be made aware of consequences of a war (that could turn nuclear) and affects of a failed/destablized neighbourhood. Same should be taught to the masses by the Govt. across the border.

An Indo-Pak war is what these monsters want. And the media, the public pressure is keen on providing what they need.

The current democratic Pak Govt. will take some time to tame the ISI and Army and anti-India elements (though I am dissappointed they did not even bother to initiate the process) coz they too have emense pressure and a lot of other priorities (Yet they find time to look into Kashmir sounds intresting to me).

People should understand that India may win over pakistan in a conventional conflict but their are no winners in a nuclear war. Even if India run over Pak forces in a limited coventional war, the destablized western neighbour and probably an angered China would become a grave concern for India.
Who would really mind that ?
Even what did you think during mumbai attacks?
Having peace with pakistan or to destroy terrorists and the one who supported them.
There is no possibility of nuke war...
We gave hand to them via sports..WC semi finals...
but they want to regain good name by attacking india when it was humiliated by osamas incident.
There will be limit for every thing though war is not a good solution.
 
.
Who would really mind that ?
Even what did you think during mumbai attacks?
Having peace with pakistan or to destroy terrorists and the one who supported them.
There is no possibility of nuke war...
We gave hand to them via sports..WC semi finals...
but they want to regain good name by attacking india when it was humiliated by osamas incident.
There will be limit for every thing though war is not a good solution.

I, as a fellow India understand your utter dissappointment over 26/11 and the proceedings thereafter. I am not trying to be pro-Pak
but just for the sake of putting the facts right-
You can't say India gave a good hand (the WC) coz that was bound by the rules of ICC. Btw for ur information if u don't know PCB was one of the deciding factor during voting which put 2011 Cricket World Cup in Indian subcontinent.
So in my view the only good we have seen in sports diplomacy is meeting of MMS with Gilani, which was very successful.

They never anything about attacking India at the first India. It was Indian Media which was trying to shape a public opinion and pressurise GoI to take US style action.

Although I believe instead of a war such brief and covert actions are justified if another Mumbai happens. But before that we should try and improve our relations to an extent that a bilateral action is possible.
 
. .
@ rjkindal

Why must we leave the Mumbai attacks behind us? If it were up to me, i would never support improving relations with Pakistan. Right from the start their policy has revolved around making India bleed from a thousand cuts. I say we do nothing. I say we let them rot and do absolutely nothing to help them recover. I am not suggesting war, that would be disastrous. I am suggesting passive observation and active defence. While at the same time maintaining covert aggression.
 
. .
@ rjkindal

Why must we leave the Mumbai attacks behind us? If it were up to me, i would never support improving relations with Pakistan. Right from the start their policy has revolved around making India bleed from a thousand cuts. I say we do nothing. I say we let them rot and do absolutely nothing to help them recover. I am not suggesting war, that would be disastrous. I am suggesting passive observation and active defence. While at the same time maintaining covert aggression.
the feeling is mutual you have donw the same to us too my friend, keep one thing in mind a radicalized Pakistan is going to be an Indian nightmare and before you know it we are going to take the largest democracy by storm........
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom