In Kashmir, you are denying the people the right to decide their future. The claim on Kashmir is on an "instrument of accession" which is never been made public. Even if there is such an instrument signed, question is who was the signatory?
A Maharaja, whose grand father purchased whole Kashmir from an other occupation force, the British. Have you ever heard an example in the history of mankind, where an entire State alongwith its people is sold to other party just like a property dealing?
And the same rule was when applicable to Hyderabad Deccan, your government had different standards?
Long debate, to cut it short. There is a freedom struggle in Kashmir a genuine one. India obviously terms it as terror movement. Let the time decide, how Kashmiri populace will go about it.