What's new

US, India and Japan launch joint naval exercises to keep China in check

Penetration aids as in a dildo? LOL, just kidding. For a missile with no MIRV technology, this is a rather straight forward kill for Chinese BMD.
Well. its a dildo to screw Chinese, just like Nanjing and bayonets.
As I said, it will be interesting to see how Chinese decision makers like to gamble with probablities. From their stance till now, they don't want to gamble.
 
.
India doesn't want war, but India is more than capable of defending itself alone if any war is imposed upon it. However, India will continue to work towards ensuring the security and stability of Asia and continue to stand firm against the evil hegemonic, imperialistic forces and terrorist sympathizers and patrons of Asia. :)

Capable of defending in your dreams? with your country's snail speed of BUYING weapons, India will be a thing of the past very soon.
 
.
China and India are both not saints, it's just business bro. Btw, you do realize you are being used by US right? US tend to abandon their 'bit*es' after using them.

There is no "Used by USA"...it's mutual interest. Is China being used by Pakistan or North Korea...and/or using them?

Capable of defending in your dreams? with your country's snail speed of BUYING weapons, India will be a thing of the past very soon.

We saw that...Chinese leadership has calmed down after firing a salvo of........well, only warnings & threats.
 
.
China and India are both not saints, it's just business bro. Btw, you do realize you are being used by US right? US tend to abandon their 'bit*es' after using them.
Lets say, we know how to play this game. In '71 we were able to leverage Russian threats and achieve our strategic goal of preventing a two front hostile situation by 'freeing' BD. We know how to play one power against another.
 
.
Well. its a dildo to screw Chinese, just like Nanjing and bayonets.
As I said, it will be interesting to see how Chinese decision makers like gamble with probablities. From their stance till now, they don't want to gamble.

LOL China has been working on ABM system since March 1986 to be like USA, check out project 863 if u want. So stop chest-thumping with your Agni-IV and Agni-V, they're like kid's toys in front of China's defense.
 
.
LOL China has been working on ABM system since March 1986 to be like USA, check out project 863 if u want. So stop chest-thumping with your Agni-IV and Agni-V, they're like kid's toys in front of China's defense.
US has been working on ABM for even longer and they are still not confident about it, what makes you to think that yours will be better than theirs. ABM is a pipe dream and can only work against simple threats like scud missiles.
 
.
There is no "Used by USA"...it's mutual interest. Is China being used by Pakistan or North Korea...and/or using them?



We saw that...Chinese leadership has calmed down after firing a salvo of........well, only warnings & threats.

Yeah we have no intent to deal with you right now, because we are in the progress of MASS BUILD UP. AND INDIA IS NOT. and we will deal with you when the balance is completely in our favor.
 
.
There is no "Used by USA"...it's mutual interest. Is China being used by Pakistan or North Korea...and/or using them?

We saw that...Chinese leadership has calmed down after firing a salvo of........well, only warnings & threats.
Well, you can tell Modi is the 'b*tch' when he was shaking Trump's hands. =). Pakistan and NK don't exhibit such subservient behaviour when talking to China, we are almost equals.


Well. its a dildo to screw Chinese, just like Nanjing and bayonets.
As I said, it will be interesting to see how Chinese decision makers like to gamble with probablities. From their stance till now, they don't want to gamble.
Bye bye! =)
 
. .
Lets say, we know how to play this game. In '71 we were able to leverage Russian threats and achieve our strategic goal of preventing a two front hostile situation by 'freeing' BD. We know how to play one power against another.
BD was geographically and politically gonna be separated anyway. It is just natural. You think today's BD is your friend? Look at how many BD Muslims are in India now? The number will grow, more lower caste people will convert. This wil change the demographics in WB, sooner of later another state will break off.
 
.
BD was geographically and politically gonna be separated anyway. It is just natural. You think today's BD is your friend? Look at how many BD Muslims are in India now? The number will grow, more lower caste people will convert. This wil change the demographics in WB, sooner of later another state will break off.

The point was that we know how to play one power against another for achieving our strategic objectives.

As far as BD goes, It was simple, rather than to deal with Pakistan at two front, we would prefer to deal with two independent countries. Imagine, dealing with missile threats from East and West Pakistan together. Or dealing with shelling on both the borders.

And about those Bangladeshi Muslims, this is how we deal with them.


Our police shoots to kill these days and those Bangladeshi make some really good target.

BTW, can you clarify 'another state'? Which state has broken off with India?
 
.
Yeah we have no intent to deal with you right now, because we are in the progress of MASS BUILD UP. AND INDIA IS NOT. and we will deal with you when the balance is completely in our favor.

Come up with something real instead of this hollow chest-thumping. We have stopped your road construction in Doklam and still sitting there....you could do zilch, all your warnings combined were valued less than a tissue paper by us. 'MASS BUILD UP' my foot.

Well, you can tell Modi is the 'b*tch' when he was shaking Trump's hands. =). Pakistan and NK don't exhibit such subservient behaviour when talking to China, we are almost equals.

Your Xingping had many handshakes with Modi.....well, it's not that I am denying your Xingping is a b*tch.
 
.
BD was geographically and politically gonna be separated anyway. It is just natural. You think today's BD is your friend? Look at how many BD Muslims are in India now? The number will grow, more lower caste people will convert. This wil change the demographics in WB, sooner of later another state will break off.

blah blah blah
comment on stuff you know something about
 
.
Actually most of the Chinese on this forum are tool.

What they don't understand is a simple political game between India and China.

China wants India to withdraw which will symbolise both Indian defeat there and the fact that Bhutan can no longer depend upon India for their defence and foreign policy. Meaning it will push Bhutan into Chinese sphere. So actually India has got no choice there. Their tactical and strategic goal here is to make India withdraw. Rest will follow from that.

As far as confrontation goes, China has their game laid out there. They do not want to escalate to military confrontation, for obvious reasons. They do not want to get bogged down in a conflict right now. A conflict in which --however small-- there is chance of losing face. If India initiates the violence, they can always claim self defence but not the other way round. Hence their statement will go shriller and shriller and more provocative. Escalation of diplomatic statements will put more pressure on India government and if few shots are fired by Indian military on the border, all the better. It will allow UNSC and world powers to pressure India into de-escalation. A de-escalation in which Indian forces return India and India is seen as an aggressor. This will fulfill their goal.

For India, the path is pretty straight foreward. They want the status quo to continue till quite sometime. Each day India force remains firm in Bhutan while facing Chinese force, India cements her role as a protector and ally to Bhutan and will increase influence on Bhutan. Also it will send a strong signal to China that India will defend her interests in and outside their territory. For India, an escalation is out of question but a defensive position is vital. This is why Indian government is so quick in re-enforcing Indian army there with helicopters and more troops. They simply want their forces to remain entrenched and India response to Chinese diplomatic provocation is very calibrated and rare.

So in a nutshell, India wants status quo to continue. China wants to provoke India into committing a stupid mistake and use de-escalation under international pressure for making India withdraw their troops. Hence the present situation. In future too it will continue like this. Shriller statements from China and Indian government will only give calibrated response to Chinese shrills with no military action while continuing the standoff with China.
 
Last edited:
.
Lol! No, you did a surprise attack, with overwhelming numbers. That was your great strategy, Indian army was outnumbered and was concentrated at the western side. In short, Nehru never expected China to attack.
Now this strategy will not work.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1984/CJB.htm
CALVIN, James Barnard, Lieutenant Commander, U. S. Navy

"By 1961, India had acquired aircraft, helicopters, engi-
neering and other military equipment from the United States
and Russia. Thus equipped, the Indian army invaded Portugese
Goa in December, 1961.
Goa was rapidly constitutionally in-
corporated into the Indian republic. Although no real pro-
tests or opposition occurred as a result of this action, the
annexation of Goa reinforced China's view of India as being
expansionistic.
This foreign military support also encouraged India to
pursue her forward policy in Aksai Chin. In 1961, India had
purchased eight Antov transports--complete with 40 Soviet
pilots, navigators and mechanics--for use in Aksai Chin.
Russian also supplied India with 24 Ilyushin-14 transports and
Mil'-4 helicopters, capable of lifting men and supplies to
altitudes of 17,000 feet. By mid-1962, India had also agreed
to buy two squadrons of Soviet MIG jet fighters. Thus forti-
fied, India pursued a more aggressive foreign policy against
China.

By the end of 1961, Nehru had sent enough Indian Army
troops into Aksai Chin to establish about 43 posts on the
Ladakh frontier claimed by China. Many of the Indian outposts
were parallel to, but about 100 miles from, the first Chinese
military road. However, three of the outposts were near Konga
Pass, in the vicinity of the second Chinese highway.
In August, 1961, China began sending a series of angry
protests to India. China had one basic arguement: that Indan
troops had intruded into Chinese territory. Nehru's response
to Chou's complaints was that his (Nehru's) purpose was to
"vacate the aggression (by the Chinese) by whatever means are
feasible to us. . . . I do not see any kind of peace in the
frontier so long as all recognised aggression is not vacated."

Are you being ignorant, plain lying through your teeth or being brainwashed?
All that preparation for war and STRONK after military victory in Goa and you dare say India was taken by surprise.
India is surprised because India thought that with the support of Russia and USA, and China in the throes of famine will DEFINITELY not dare to respond to India's aggression.
India is surprised because India thought fighting the Chinese is like fighting the Portuguese.
India is surprised because how dare the Chinese oppose India, the leader of the non-aligned.
We will have to wait and see what the Chinese will do.

They waited 6 months and tried all means to settle with India peacefully in 1962.
The Indians mistook that as China's weakness and a fear of war with India.
The Chinese are again patiently waiting for the Indians to come to their senses and resolve this issue peacefully.
I am afraid given the war mongering and hegemonic mindset of the Indians, China would have to wait in vain.
The Chinese showed the Indians mercy and magnanimity in 1962 and this is the response they get from the ungrateful Indians.
Hope I don't have to wait too long before China will hit the Indians hard and show no mercy this time round.
.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom