What's new

US has no stance on ‘private citizen’ Imran: State Dept

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
WASHINGTON: The State Department has said former Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan “is a private citizen, and the US government does not have a stance” on private citizens.

At a regular news briefing on Thursday afternoon, journalists pointed out that the Pakistani government was advising news outlets “not even to mention Mr Khan’s name” in their news bulletins and talk shows.

“So, would you like to say something about (how this impacts press freedom) and the public’s right to access information?” one of the journalists asked.

“I would say that we generally urge all governments to respect the role of journalists and media. We believe the press performs a critical function in democratic societies,” Matthew Miller, the State Department’s spokesperson, said.

“We expect that journalists covering the events in Pakistan should all be allowed to do their work.”

A free and independent press, he said, was a vital, core institution that “undergirds healthy democracies by ensuring that electorates can make informed decisions and holding government officials accountable”.

When asked what is the current US stance towards Imran Khan, Mr Miller said: “He’s a private citizen. We don’t generally have stances towards private (citizens).”

When a journalist reminded him that Mr Khan was a former prime minister who “claims that defying US policies led to his downfall”, the State Department official said: “I would say that we’ve spoken to this in the past. Those allegations are absolutely false. Pakistani politics are a matter for the Pakistani people to decide, pursuant to their own constitution and laws. They are not a matter for the US government.”

At another news briefing this week, Mr Miller was asked if he was aware of Islamabad’s decision to hold military trials of civilian protesters.

“We are aware of the reports concerning civilians who will face military trials for their suspected involvement in the May 9 protest,” the US official said.

“We continue, as we have in the past, to urge Pakistani authorities to respect democratic principles and the rule of law for all people as enshrined in the country’s constitution.”

 
. . .
When a journalist reminded him that Mr Khan was a former prime minister who “claims that defying US policies led to his downfall”, the State Department official said: “I would say that we’ve spoken to this in the past. Those allegations are absolutely false. Pakistani politics are a matter for the Pakistani people to decide, pursuant to their own constitution and laws. They are not a matter for the US government.”

Well--how much has America helped the current govt. since April 2022? You know, a 'regime change' in a country of 220+ million people, with 100+ nukes in a very strategic location would surely require supporting the new government. As we see, even $1 billion IMF loan is hard to get. So much so for the 'Imported Government' and the 'Absolutely Not' BS that Imran propagated.
Sigh!!
 
. . .
WASHINGTON: The State Department has said former Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan “is a private citizen, and the US government does not have a stance” on private citizens.

At a regular news briefing on Thursday afternoon, journalists pointed out that the Pakistani government was advising news outlets “not even to mention Mr Khan’s name” in their news bulletins and talk shows.

“So, would you like to say something about (how this impacts press freedom) and the public’s right to access information?” one of the journalists asked.

“I would say that we generally urge all governments to respect the role of journalists and media. We believe the press performs a critical function in democratic societies,” Matthew Miller, the State Department’s spokesperson, said.

“We expect that journalists covering the events in Pakistan should all be allowed to do their work.”

A free and independent press, he said, was a vital, core institution that “undergirds healthy democracies by ensuring that electorates can make informed decisions and holding government officials accountable”.

When asked what is the current US stance towards Imran Khan, Mr Miller said: “He’s a private citizen. We don’t generally have stances towards private (citizens).”

When a journalist reminded him that Mr Khan was a former prime minister who “claims that defying US policies led to his downfall”, the State Department official said: “I would say that we’ve spoken to this in the past. Those allegations are absolutely false. Pakistani politics are a matter for the Pakistani people to decide, pursuant to their own constitution and laws. They are not a matter for the US government.”

At another news briefing this week, Mr Miller was asked if he was aware of Islamabad’s decision to hold military trials of civilian protesters.

“We are aware of the reports concerning civilians who will face military trials for their suspected involvement in the May 9 protest,” the US official said.

“We continue, as we have in the past, to urge Pakistani authorities to respect democratic principles and the rule of law for all people as enshrined in the country’s constitution.”


Time for Imran Khan to dust off the U.S cypher, hehe!

Blame the ol' Joe "Jungli" Biden.
 
.
I think he was a US citizen.

His killing just happened to align with America's international political stance.

His untimely demise - I'm assuming - was just far too damn juicy to pass up!

Whereas Imran Khan, like it or not, is nothing - as far as Uncle Sam is concerned. They've pulled out of War on Terror, pulled out of Afghanistan, left an entire f**king country to a bunch of so called "beareded terrorists," and all the shit they left is ours to clean-up.

No one gives two f**ks about Imran Khan - or Pakistan, Naya or not.

If he wants America's attention then - I suppose - he will have to cast doubts on our nuclear arsenal and make-up sensational, fantastical stories out of his arse. That's definitely going to raise more than a few eyebrows, I bet!
 
.
Wasn't Jamal Khashoggi a private citizen...

The US seemed to have taken that pretty personal, don't you think?
1. Permanent resident, normally staying in U.S. at the time of his death.
2. You can't compare murder by a State vs. harassment by a State.
3. The constant refrain of IK was U.S. intervention (when it was none or minimal). Won't it look absurd for U.S. to publicly make noise now?
4. Biden hasn't forgotten the OBL ride in Abbottabad. Biden is not just another politician. His late son served in the Army.
 
. . .
How about the good old concern about the dismantling of democracy in Pakistan?
U.S. Government believes democracy is alive and well in Pakistan. Not just USG, no government in the world believes democracy is threatened or absent in Pakistan.
 
.
US foriegn minister to Iraq : Sadam is ok to invade Kuwait, he has our blessing.
US after the Iraq invasion... sucker fool! Haha gotcha.
The generals of pak don't know what's coming for them. Wait and see...
 
.
Now I understand “Absolutely not “ really hurts them white bitches …
 
.
No one gives two f**ks about Imran Khan - or Pakistan, Naya or not.
Then why put a gag on media to not mention his name or go at lengths to defang his party or abduct his supporters?

Or nothing of that sort happened?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom