US has excess capacity and requests China to buy chips! | U.S. Chip Crisis

[onebyone]

 

[Nan Yang]

Anybody could have predicted this outcome.

U.S. SENATE VOTES 64-32 TO ADVANCE $79 BILLION CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR COMPETITION BILL

 

[Han Patriot]

Anybody could have predicted this outcome.

U.S. SENATE VOTES 64-32 TO ADVANCE $79 BILLION CHINA SEMICONDUCTOR COMPETITION BILL

View attachment 874780

Everytime you subsidized something, you end up overproducing something. US used to be about free markets and competition, now you see them subsidizing because they can't compete.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Just as Pompeo said a few days ago America does not take orders from China, China does not take orders from America.

 

[Beast]

You ask me to buy or beg me to buy?

 

[K_Bin_W]

Don't buy but produce your own it may be a short time pain but long time win. It will be game over sooner than you think.

 

[DoTell]

Just as Pompeo said a few days ago America does not take orders from China, China does not take orders from America.

What do you mean? We take orders worth hundreds of billions pf dollars from them every year. They talk the talk we walk the walk. "We ain't got no problem with that!"

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Buy them up and export them to Russia. Make Americans bawl their eyes out.

 

[PakFactor]

Is US stupid? You start a conflict and now you want China to buy? Should have thought this through before you put China on a path to self-reliance.

 

[gambit]

Everytime you subsidized something, you end up overproducing something. US used to be about free markets and competition, now you see them subsidizing because they can't compete.

You mean China's semicon industry was/is completely free of government subsidy? Be careful in your answer, it may come back and byte you.

 

[Beast]

You mean China's semicon industry was/is completely free of government subsidy? Be careful in your answer, it may come back and byte you.

It US who first accuse other of subsidies and unfair practice. Then after attacking others, they themselves slap their own face and decide to follow.

 

[gambit]

It US who first accuse other of subsidies and unfair practice. Then after attacking others, they themselves slap their own face and decide to follow. LOL..

Again...Was/is China's semicon industry free of government subsidies?

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

You mean China's semicon industry was/is completely free of government subsidy? Be careful in your answer, it may come back and byte you.

The US don't have a socialist infrastructure to support a socialist industry. In China everything is government owned. In the US industry is private or public owned. The sudden subsidy is not what the US infrastructure can handle.

 

[gambit]

The US don't have a socialist infrastructure to support a socialist industry. In China everything is government owned. In the US industry is private or public owned. The sudden subsidy is not what the US infrastructure can handle.

Finally...So China's semicon industry is government subsidized. Was that so hard to admit? Must sucks to first criticize others when you had to admit to the sin.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Finally...So China's semicon industry is government subsidized. Was that so hard to admit? Must sucks to first criticize others when you had to admit to the sin.

China is a socialist country. There is no such thing as subsidies in China. Government owns everything. The US industry is not government owned, so the subsidy passed by Congress mucked everything up. The US industry don't have a socialist infrastructure to handle the subsidy.